Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04765-00
Original file (04765-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAW ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 4765-00
03 October 2000

Dear 

SEAMA

::

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 03 October 2000.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420  
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

Your allegations of error and injustice

N130Dl/OU0405 of 10 August 2000, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION

2000 NAVY PENTAGO
 

WASHINGTON. D.C.

N

20350-2000

Y

S

IN  REPLY  REFER  T O

5420
N130D1/ 
10 Aug 2000

OuO405

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

RE
N ,

N THE CASE OF SEAMEN

:

Encl:

(1)

BCNR File # 04765-00 with Microfiche Service Record

The following provides comment and recommendation on Seamen

1 .
Hembree's petition.

N130  recommends deny  

2 .
Enlistment Bonus (EB).

Seame

s petition for an

, an Other Service Veteran (OSVET), enlisted in

3. Seamen
the Navy through the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on
2000 under the OSVET PRISE III Aviation Structural Mechanic
School Guarantee Program.
Safety Equipment
petition, Seamen.
assignment to the  
will allow payment in the amount of

$5,000.

 

 

claims he is entitled to an EB for

AME  rating and requests favorable action that

25 April

In his

but a recruiting tool used at the

The EB program is budgeted on

EB is not an entitlement,

4.
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals
to enlist in critical skills.
quotas provided to the Commander,
the Enlisted Community Manager,
accession seats.
EB.
is not an EB eligible program as
GENADMIN EB message.
programs are not required to be counseled regarding the EB
option.

Seamen

Recruits enlisting in non-EB eligible

Navy Recruiting Command and
not by the number of A-school

Every recruit is not offered nor receives an

enlisted under the PRISE III Program, which

listed in the applicable BUPERS

BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned

5.
herewith as enclosure (1).

Assistant,

Enlisted Bonus

Programs Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04530-00

    Original file (04530-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (AECF/AEF) On 26 January 2000 Seamen In his petition, Seamen - Carlson requests payment of EB Program and He shipped to active EB is paid upon successful completion EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the 4. discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to enlist in critical skills. member has started training in the skill for which they are to receive an EB, and receive an EB. EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08060-00

    Original file (08060-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 S IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/0lU1102 22 Jun 01 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF Encl: (1) BCNR case file #08060-00 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04692-01

    Original file (04692-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by of which is attached. EB contracts are guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4. and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06895-02

    Original file (06895-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 29 Ott 2002 02UO591 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN w Encl: (1) BCNR case file #06895-02 with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00529-03

    Original file (00529-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. In his petition, Petty Officer was told at the Charlotte MEPS that he was not el He requests favorable action that will allow payment of an EB. Every recruit is not offc~ed n"l- r ~ c e i i r e ~ an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05083-01

    Original file (05083-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N of which is attached. 20350~2000 N OF THE NAV Y S REPLY REFER TO IN 5420 N130Dl/OlU1252 12 Sep 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS CASE FIREMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05083-01 with microfiche service record The...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01705-01

    Original file (01705-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Delayed'Entry Program (DEP) on 21 August 1998 under a Navy Veteran (NAVET), enlisted in the ""states that he has an EB entry in his DD Form 1966 and requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB. Petty Officer paygrade E-3 or below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01056-00

    Original file (01056-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 03 October 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-200 NAV Y N 0 S IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 23 Mar 200 0 0~0212 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04314-01

    Original file (04314-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    his classifier could not establish whether Seaman Apprentice had ever received and EB and instructed him to petition the .an Other Service Veteran (OSVET), e Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 26 In his petition, he states that ection of Naval Records (BCNR) for an EB. Seaman Apprentice EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the The EB program is budgeted on quotas Navy Recruiting 4 . does not have an EB Contract in his At no other time may a member petition for an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05843-00

    Original file (05843-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 03 April 2001. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/OlU0077 6 MAR 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05843-00 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation Petty 1 . petition for Petty...