Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04237-01
Original file (04237-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 4237-01
27 December 200 1

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser
a copy of which is attached.

N32/06532 of 6 December 2001,

 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAW 

f?ECFUTlNG  COMMAND
S722  INTEGRITY DR.
 

MILUNGTON,TENNESSEE

38054-5057

.fijiy  REFER 

TQ

1 
Ser 
6 

Dee 01

N32/06532

Commander,
Executive Director,

Navy Recruiting Command

Board for Correction of Naval Records

(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 
(b) BUPERS  
(c) OPNAVINST  

ltr  1130 Ser  

1160.6A

1130.8F
N132C4/9U97760  of 

18'May  99

(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 04237-01
(2) CNRC 

ltr  1133 Ser  

N32/3237  of 29 Mar 01

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Per references  

paygrade  E-6 and above will be approved on a

Requests to enlist OSVETS who were separated from a

Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).
(b),

1.
and 
previous service at  
case-by-case basis by the Enlisted Community Manager.
enclosure (2) and the DD Form 1966 contained in enclosure
the applicant was authorized to enlist in  
paygrade  
attend 
members must enlist in  
eligibility for an enlistment bonus via guaranteed Class
school.
paygrade  E-5.

According to enclosure  

"A"  school via TPU.

Per reference (c), Prior service
paygrade  E-3 or below if establishing

"A"
the applicant enlisted in

 

cl),
E5/MA2  and

(11,

Per

 

(a)

This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for

2.
Correction of Naval Records only.

Enclosure (1) is returned.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03731-01

    Original file (03731-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. 1966/3 contained in enclosure Per reference (a), (b), Army OSVETs who do not paygrade This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05170-01

    Original file (05170-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05089-01

    Original file (05089-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or In this regard, it is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05478-01

    Original file (05478-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 05478-01 except for paygrade for accessions via the PRISE III program is Recommend disapproval of enclosure 1. the maximum E-3, Field(NF).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07437-01

    Original file (07437-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached N32/06521 of 6 December 2001, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06207-01

    Original file (06207-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 6207-01 27 November 2001 This is in provisions of title reference to your application for- correction of your naval record pursuant to the IO of the Ilnited States Code, section 1552. wert‘ reviewed in accordance wit panel of the three-mrmher A session, considered your iii_justice to the proceedings your application, applicable opinion furnished by copy of which is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06037-01

    Original file (06037-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    13oartl for panel of the (lorrection of Naval Records, sitting in executive A three-member session, considered your application on 27 November 200 injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of to the proceedings of this tted in support thereof, your naval record and your application, atldi tion, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations opinion...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06637-01

    Original file (06637-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06813-01

    Original file (06813-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05694-01

    Original file (05694-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LP:dd_j J Dc?cket No: IS November 200 1 5694-01 This is in reference to provisions of‘ title IO your of the apl)lication llnitrtl St;ltcas Code, section 1552. fOr correction ot’ your naval rt’cord pursuant to the three-rnembcr panel ot‘ your application in ;iccorhncc with A consitlerctl reviewed proceedings of this application, applicable statutes, opinion furnished by a copy of which...