DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
MEH:ddj
Docket No:
8 January 2002
517501
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 8 January 2002.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser
copy of which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
Your allegations of error and injustice
N32/6496 of 23 October 2001, a
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVV RECRUITING COMMAND
5722 INTEGRITY DR.
MILLlNGTON,TENNESSEE
38054-5057
Ser
23
N32/6496
Ott 01
From:
To:
Sub-j:
Ref:
Commander,
Executive Director,
Navy Recruiting Command
Board for Correction-of Naval Records
BCNR REQUEST ICO
(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST
(b) NAVPERS 15909G (Enlisted Transfer Manual)
1130.8F
Encl:
(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 05175-01
Recommend disapproval of enclosure
(b) E-4 guarantee upon successful completion of
1.
and
not authorized under the GTEP program.
the previous version of reference
(1).
(b) was in error.
Per references (a)
"A" school is
E-4 guarantee stated in
This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board of
2.
Correction of Naval Record only.
Enclosure (1) is returned.
By direction
i
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05990-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 5990-01 8 January 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. E-4 guarantee stated in Per reference (a) "A" school is This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04970-01
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a) "A" school is E-4 guarantee stated in This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05818-01
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a), This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07437-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached N32/06521 of 6 December 2001, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04237-01
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. enclosure (2) and the DD Form 1966 contained in enclosure the applicant was authorized to enlist in paygrade attend members must enlist in eligibility for an enlistment bonus via guaranteed Class school.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07012-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03731-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. 1966/3 contained in enclosure Per reference (a), (b), Army OSVETs who do not paygrade This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06813-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06415-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05170-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.