DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
JRE
Docket No: 373040
3 July 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 2 1 June 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you served on active duty in the Navy from 20 January to 8 February
There is no indication in the available
1993, when you received an entry level separation.
records that you were unfit for duty because of a psychiatric condition which was incurred in
Accordingly, your application has been
or aggravated by your brief period of service.
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to
all official
Consequently,
s on the applicant to
.
wh~~~~8~~8P~~EWJY~~i~AVBf
M-al naval record, the
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
demon~~~a~~N~~~~~~~~~~~o~~$dobable material error or
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08117-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05647-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00894-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. RE-3G, as provided for in As you have not demonstrated that you were unfit for duty, or that you were improperly assigned the RE-3G reenlistment code, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01037-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were discharged in accordance with your request on 15 November 2001.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04187-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2001. On 24 October 1986, the Physical Evaluation Board that you remained unfit for duty, and that your condition was ratable at 10%. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03213-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAV Y ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JRE Docket No: 32 8 October 2002 13-02 This is in reference to your provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00472-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03240-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 December 2001. 6100/4, in The Board found that on 9 January 1998, you completed a NAVMED Form which you acknowledged that you had been counseled concerning the effects of your refusal to undergo surgery to correct your torn medial meniscus, to include the possibility of discharge from the naval service without entitlement to disability benefits administered by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01827-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. d, The fact that the fitness report for the previous reporting period from the same reporting senior is a better report has no...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01464-01
You requested that your A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...