DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 3529-00
22 February 2001
-
Dear
This is in reference to your
naval record pursuant to the
States Code, Section 1552.
application for correction of your
provisions of Title 10, United
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 14 February 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The record reflects that you received
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 18
January 1958 at age 19.
three nonjudicial punishments and were convicted by a summary
court-martial and two special courts-martial.
The offenses
included an unauthorized absence of a day, sleeping on watch,
dereliction of duty, insubordination, drunk and disorderly
conduct, and disorderly conduct.
medical survey found that you were unfit for further service by
reason of enuresis.
by reason of physical disability without severance pay.
Thereafter, you received a general discharge
On 2 February 1961 a board of
Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct and
proficiency averages, both of which are computed from marks
assigned during periodic evaluations.
proficiency averages were 3.7 and 3.9, respectively.
average conduct mark of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable
characterization of service at the time of separation.
Your conduct and
A minimum
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
immaturity.
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
given your six disciplinary actions as well as the fact that your
conduct average was insufficiently high to warrant a fully
honorable discharge.
denied.
furnished upon request.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
Accordingly, your application has been
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05722-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct and your failure to achieve the required average mark in conduct. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00426-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 13 May 1958 you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve at age 22 after a prior period of honorable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07016-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 26 March 1964 at age 17. During this period, you were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01445-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 November 2001. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your disciplinary action, and since your conduct and proficiency averages were insufficiently high to warrant a fully honorable In this regard, there is no evidence of any medical discharge. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04730-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09219-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 4 June 1957, you received a third NJP for disorderly conduct, and were awarded reduction to paygrade E-1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06258-00
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. your contentions were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of three a deck court and a summary court-martial, and failure to received the require average in conduct. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02807-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00189-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive séssion, considered your ; application on 12 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the © existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02287-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct which...