Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01876-00
Original file (01876-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

CRS
Docket No: 1876-00
21 August 2001

Dear

This is in reference to your  
brother for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552.

applicatipn  on behalf of your late

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 21 August 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your brother's naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

On 13 May 1948 your brother reenlisted in the Naval Reserve after
more than three years of prior active duty.
active duty on 25 October 1950.
diagnosed as having tuberculosis.
1 March 1952 by reason of physical disability retirement.

On 10 October 1951 he was

He reported to

He was honorably discharged on

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found no evidence that would support your claim
for an award of the Purple Heart to your brother.
regard, in order for an individual to be eligible for the Purple
Heart, one must be wounded by hostile action.
.application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

Accordingly, your
The names and votes of the members

In this

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a

presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for   a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07949-99

    Original file (07949-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by the Military Awards Branch, Headquarters, Marine Corps, dated 27 April 2000, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support Your allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02801-00

    Original file (02801-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 3 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations considered your Your allegations of error and After careful and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06676-01

    Original file (06676-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Headquarters Marine Corps In this connection, the Board substantially Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. VIRGINIA 221 34-51...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03551-00

    Original file (03551-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TRG Docket No: 3551-00 25 September 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction-of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. considered your application on 25 Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, September...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02998-01

    Original file (02998-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. considered your application on After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00549-01

    Original file (00549-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 29 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02997-01

    Original file (02997-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO dated 27 December 200 which is attached. Documentary material considered by the Board 1, a copy of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice warranting approval of your request to award you the Purple Heart Medal. D.C. 20350-200 N 0 IN REPLY REFER T...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01944-03

    Original file (01944-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03530-01

    Original file (03530-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. approved and you were transferred to the PDRL with a 50 percent disability rating on 16 September 1969. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05203-00

    Original file (05203-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 CRS Docket No: 5203-00 21 August 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 29 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...