Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03551-00
Original file (03551-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0 TRG

Docket No: 3551-00
25 September 2001

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction-of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States
Code, section 1552.

considered your application on 25

Your allegations of error and injustice were

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session,
September 2001.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support  
thereof,.your  naval record and
applicable statutes,
In addition, the
Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval
Operations, a copy of which is enclosed and your rebuttal thereto
dated 14 September 2001.

regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this connection the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion.

Accordingly, your application has been denied.
of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The names and votes

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

You are entitled to have the Board

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION

2000 NAVY PENTAGO
DC.  

WASHINGTON. 

20350-2000

N

S

IN REPLY REFER  
09B13/1U518186

Ser 
7 August 2001

TO

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Chief of Naval Operations  
Chairman, Board for Corrections of Naval Records

(N09B13)

RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF.

(a) BCNR ltr AEG:jdh Docket No: 3551-00 of 15 May 2001
(b) 10 U.S.C. 1552

(1) BCNR File
(2) Service Record
(3) Medical Record

As requested by reference (a) and in accordance with reference

(b), the Chief of
1.
Naval Operations has reviewed subject man's case for eligibility determination for the
Purple Heart for minor injuries he sustained on November 24, 1944 and January 21, 1945
when he was assigned to the USS HANCOCK  

(CV 19).

 

In accordance with Executive Order 11016,

2.
there must be adequate documentation that a service member was wounded as a direct
result of enemy action.
is considered essential to maintaining the integrity of this important decoration.
Being injured during war/combat operations and requiring medical treatment in itself
does not justify the awarding of the Purple Heart.
records do not confirm this fact,
from two eyewitnesses who have

personal knowledge of the injury and circumstances,

While the requirement for enemy action may seem stringent, it

we will reconsider upon receipt of sworn affidavits

before the Purple Heart can be approved,

When the service and medical

November 24, 1944 and on January 21 1945 he was
assigned to the USS HANCOCK  
flight deck, injuring and killing crewmembers.
Heart cannot be authorized.

returned 

 

sliqhtlv iniured  

when-hplan~

from/attacks and accidently dropped a bomb on the

This was an accident and a Purple

3.

We will reconsider

request for the Purple Heart in

much as possible the extent of the 

injuriesm.sustained.

In view of the above, enclosures (1) through (3) are returned pending the receipt

4.
of the notorized eyewitness statements.

However, based upon the documentation contained

5.
the Chief of Naval Operations was able to make an eligibility determination under
Pubric  Law 106-65 for the retroactive Combat Action Ribbon for his World War II
service.

The ribbon will be forwarde

- service record,

- -_

in



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01431-02

    Original file (01431-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Navy Department Board of Decorations and Medals reviewed Mr. -petition for a Purple Heart.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06007-00

    Original file (06007-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your application on 27 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 9 April 2001, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07440-00

    Original file (07440-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 2 NAVY ANNE WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 X 0 S CRS Docket No: 7440-00 5 December 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 30 July 2001, a copy of which is attached. Naval Operations has reviewed subject man's case for eligibility determination for the Purple...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04968-00

    Original file (04968-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 9 July 2001, a copy of which is attached. of the officers and enlisted Marines who were assigned to his former unit by requesting copies of the unit rosters for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07733-00

    Original file (07733-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. A review of his service and medical records, and the records at this Headquarters fails to reveal any documentation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002397

    Original file (0002397.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the submission is at Exhibit A. The member must provide documentation to support the injury was as a direct result of enemy action and that he received medical treatment by medical personnel for said wound. A complete copy of the advisory is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and in rebuttal submitted a statement from a former soldier...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00549-01

    Original file (00549-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 29 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0003104

    Original file (0003104.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: As a tail gunner in a B-24 Bomber during World War II, his plane was gunned down by the Germans. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Recognition Programs Branch, AFPC/DPPPR, indicates that the Purple Heart is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action. THOMAS C. MARKIEWICZ Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-03104 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF...

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2008-204

    Original file (2008-204.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated October 22, 2009, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant1 asked the Board to correct his military record to show that he was awarded a Purple Heart for an injury he received when his ship, the USS CAVALIER, was torpedoed by a Japanese submarine on January 30, 1945. 2007-032, in which the Board ordered the Coast Guard to review the applicant’s record to determine whether he was entitled to a Purple Heart Medal...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02998-01

    Original file (02998-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. considered your application on After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...