Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02801-00
Original file (02801-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

CRS
Docket No:   2801-00
15 October 2001

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code,

Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session,
application on 3 October 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof,
and policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
together with all material submitted in support

your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations

considered your

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that on 27 October 1947 you enlisted in the
Marine Corps Reserve.
recalled to active duty on 31 August 1950.
were accidently and seriously wounded when a  
discharged.
on 23 January   1952.
1952 by reason of physical disability retirement.

.45 caliber pistol
A physical evaluation board found you unfit for duty
You were honorably discharged on 29 February

You reenlisted on 7 January 1950 and were

On 3 October 1951 you

On 26 July 1990 you were informed by Headquarters Marine Corps
that you were not eligible for the award of the Purple Heart
based on the accidental discharge of a weapon.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found no evidence that would support your claim
for an award of the Purple Heart.
In this regard, in order for
an individual to be eligible for the Purple Heart,  
one.must be
wounded by hostile action.
been denied.
will be furnished upon request.

Accordingly, your application has
The names and votes of the members of the panel

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03055-03

    Original file (03055-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01876-00

    Original file (01876-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your brother's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07949-99

    Original file (07949-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by the Military Awards Branch, Headquarters, Marine Corps, dated 27 April 2000, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support Your allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05541-01

    Original file (05541-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You served without further incident and received a general discharge upon the expiration of your enlistment on 15 September 1953. of 4.0 in conduct was required for a fully honorable characteri- zation of service at the time of your discharge.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05914-06

    Original file (05914-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In addition, you did not submit a claim to the Veterans Administration for residuals of wounds,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00177-01

    Original file (00177-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director 2 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS ROA D 3280 RUSSELL QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-51 0 Y 3 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1650 MMMA-3 30ctOl MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR) Subj: ADVISORY OPINION(S) IN THE CASE OF FORMER MARINE During the period he served in the Marine Corps, the Purple 1. a review of his service and medical records, Since there is no indication in the records of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05157-99

    Original file (05157-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2000. Documentary ‘material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were wounded in action on 26 December 1968, and awarded the Purple Heart on 5 January 1969.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03231-01

    Original file (03231-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 13 August 2001, a copy of which is attached. a review of his service and medical records, which would qualify him for the Purple Since there is no indication in the records that he was regulations require that he obtain eyewitness The eyewitness statements can be from the medical 3. injured under conditions, Heart award, statements. is accepted as one of the two required...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07172-01

    Original file (07172-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 December 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. That diagnosis was confirmed by a board of medical survey The Board found that you were inducted into the Marine Corps on 19 September 1950.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03530-01

    Original file (03530-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. approved and you were transferred to the PDRL with a 50 percent disability rating on 16 September 1969. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.