Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05203-00
Original file (05203-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

CRS
Docket No: 5203-00
21 August 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 21 August 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 29 May
2001, a copy of which is attached.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
The names and
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

In this connection, the Board substantially

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot   be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

2

i

i

i

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

2000 NAVY PENTAGON

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-2000

IN REPLY REFER TO

09813/1U517043

Ser 
29 May 2001

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Chief of Naval Operations  
Chairman,

Board for Correction of Naval Records

(N09B13)

(a) BCNR 
(b) 10 U.S.C. 1552

It-r AEG:jdh Docket No:

5203-00 of 8 Jan 01

(1) BCNR File
(2) Service Record
(3) Medical Record

As requested by reference (a) and in accordance with

1.
reference (b),
subject man's case and agrees with the findings of Bureau of
Naval Personnel (PERS 313E) to not approve the Purple Heart.
Enclosures (1) through (3) are returned as requested.

the Chief of Naval Operations has reviewed



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08310-00

    Original file (08310-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 13 March 2001 831040 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03551-00

    Original file (03551-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TRG Docket No: 3551-00 25 September 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction-of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. considered your application on 25 Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, September...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00833-01

    Original file (00833-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05081-00

    Original file (05081-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Active Duty Commander Line Promotion Selection Board acted that material error of fact or material contrary to law, administrative error occurred or that material information was not considered by the promotion selection board. Line Promotion Selection Board specifically directs the board to select officers that are...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06982-01

    Original file (06982-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370.5100 LCC:lc Docket No: 6982-01 6 November 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07828-00

    Original file (07828-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 03 April 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enlistment Bonus (EB).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07826-00

    Original file (07826-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted ‘in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enlistment Bonus (EB). In his petition, -claims his recruiter promised him an EB and Seaman requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05843-00

    Original file (05843-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 03 April 2001. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/OlU0077 6 MAR 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05843-00 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation Petty 1 . petition for Petty...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06261-00

    Original file (06261-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE: NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 2037C-5100 HD: hd Docket No: 06261-00 4 June 2001 C USNR Dear Lieuten This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, your lieutenant date of rank be changed from 20 May 1 March 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05377-08

    Original file (05377-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandums 7220 N130C3/08U0636 and7220 N130C3/08U0638 of 4 September 2008, a copy each is attached. N130C recommends disapproval of the petitioner’s request to draw BAH at the with-dependent rate for the time period of 1 Mar 96 to 23 Apr 02. jrye Sud D. Silva Assistant, Pay...