Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03530-01
Original file (03530-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

ELP
Docket No. 3530-01
21 September 2001

Dear.

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records,
sitting in executive session,
19 September 2001.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and injustice were

considered your application on

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 27 September 1968 for two years at
age 19.
and assigned to the USS ENTERPRISE on 26 December 1968.

The.record reflects that you were advanced to SA (E-2)

The medical record reflects that on 14 January 1969 a rocket
exploded on board USS ENTERPRISE and you suffered multiple
fragment wounds, the loss of four toes on the right foot, and
fractures of the left tibia and the third and fourth  
of the left hand.
medically transferred to an Army hospital for treatment.

As a result of your injuries, you were

metacarpals

On 17 June 1969 a medical board found you physically unfit for
duty due primarily to the loss of four toes.
to a physical evaluation board (PEB).

You were referred

On 24 June 1969 a PEB found you unfit to perform the duties of
your pay grade because of  
four toes, and fractures of left tibia and the third and fourth

physicial disability due to the loss of

The Physical Review Council concurred with the PEB

metacarpals  to your left hand.
percent.
recommendations and findings and recommended that you be placed
The PEB was
on the Permanent Disability Retired List (PDRL).
approved and you were transferred to the PDRL with a 50 percent
disability rating on 16 September 1969.

Your disability was rated at 50

The Navy and Marine Corps Awards Manual established the eligi-
bility criteria for the Purple Heart Medal.
This regulatory
guidance provides that in order to be eligible for the medal, an
individual must have been wounded or received injuries as a
direct, or indirect result of action against an enemy of the
United States.

The Board considered your statement that your ship was about
three days out of Hawaii headed for Vietnam when a rocket blew up
and you suffered multiple injuries and your contention that you
believe you are entitled to the Purple Heart because of your
injuries, your honorable service to your country, and the fact
that you almost lost your life.
However, the Board concluded
that the injuries you suffered on 14 January 1969 do not meet the
criteria for the Purple Heart Medal.
sympathetic to your request,
ENTERPRISE was not the result of combat action, but was purely an
unfortunate accident.
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

Accordingly, your application has been

the explosion on board the USS

While the Board was

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard,
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

it is important to keep in mind that a

You are entitled to have

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104598C070208

    Original file (2004104598C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical reports that the applicant submits with his request show that he was being treated for problems with his left knee. On one report, his physician indicated that the applicant had stated that he had a history of shrapnel wounds in the left hand, and had previous shrapnel wounds to his tibia. The applicant's statement that he was immediately evacuated to Japan, thus orders were never issued for award of the Purple Heart, is not consistent with the evidence of record.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00256

    Original file (PD2012-00256.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Another VA C&P examination performed on 22 March 2006, 8 months after separation showed continued signs of muscle weakness and sensory loss with some loss of muscle bulk with abnormal gait. Subsequently, the VA rated the left leg condition separately from the combined rating in the 3 November 2006 VA rating decision and rated it 20%, coded 8523-5262, (incomplete) paralysis of the deep peroneal nerve and impairment of the tibia and fibula. The VA C&P orthopedic examiner for the 22 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018984

    Original file (20080018984.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a result of a decision of this Board on 25 June 1969, the applicant's record was corrected to show that on 30 October 1967, instead of being REFRAD for the convenience of the government, the applicant was retired by reason of physical disability and placed on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL) with a 60-percent disability rating. The record further shows that after the PEB determined the applicant was fit, the U.S. Army Physical Review Council modified the findings and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00016

    Original file (PD2009-00016.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), determined unfit for continued military service and separated at 20% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Naval and Department of Defense regulations. Unfitting ConditionsCodeRatingDateConditionCodeRatingExamEffective Left Humerus Supracondylar Fracture5299-520220%20030326Left (Non-Dominant) Grade 2 Open Distal Humerus Fracture, Status Post Open Reduction and Internal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002925

    Original file (0002925.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s records reflect that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, Vietnam Service Medal (with two Bronze Service Stars (BSS)), Air Force Good Conduct Medal, the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon and the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (with one oak leaf cluster). The Purple Heart medal is awarded to personnel for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action and must have received medical treatment by medical personnel. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00843

    Original file (PD-2013-00843.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was subsequently medically evacuatedfrom theater for further evaluationforheat–related illness.At an internal medicine evaluation on 29 May 2003, the CI reported that a previous episode of heat stroke occurred in October 2002 while walking/running.At a neurological examination on 4 June 2003, the CIreported that the first heat-related episode while deployed was in early May after she was on guard duty. On the MEB DD Form 2807, dated 24 November 2003, the CI indicated she had anxiety,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01746

    Original file (PD2012 01746.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This evidence supports a determination of moderate disability.After due deliberation in consideration of all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (Reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that left tibial FX with residual weakness of the left ankle requiring an AFO and a cane for ambulation condition was separately unfitting and recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5262 IAW VASRD §4.71a. Physical Disability Board of Review Providing a correction to the individual’s separation...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00642

    Original file (PD2009-00642.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The medical basis for the separation was Radial and Ulnar Nerve Palsy of the Right Upper Extremity (right forearm nerve damage-RUE), Right Shoulder Posterior Subluxation (shoulder dislocation), and Left Open Thumb Metacarpal Fracture. The informal Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the Radial and Ulnar Nerve Palsy of the RUE as unfitting rated 20%, Right Shoulder Posterior Subluxation as unfitting rated 0%, and Left open Thumb Metacarpal Fracture as unfitting rated 0%; with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00361

    Original file (PD2009-00361.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force PEB rated the CI’s right hand pain analogous to 5215 Limitation of Motion of the Wrist and assigned a 10% rating for painful motion in accordance with VASRD paragraph 4.59. However, the CI did have painful motion of the right wrist as a result of her metacarpal fractures and a 10% rating under 5299-5215 is warranted. The 20% rating for Chronic Low Back Pain is based on the presence of a documented abnormal spinal contour on the NARSUM examination in addition to limited ROM...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01989

    Original file (PD-2014-01989.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The “chronic right leg pain due to stress fractures” and “right common peroneal nerve palsy” conditions were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditionwas submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated the right leg neuropathy and right leg healed stress fractures as unfitting, rated 10% and 0% respectively, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). ...