Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04747-01
Original file (04747-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 4747-01
25 September 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section

1552.

 

25 September 2001. Your allegations of error and

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on  
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 Ser Pers
which is attached.

852 of 23 August 2001, a copy of

 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a  
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

presunlption  of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,

In this regard, it is important

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

PERSONNEL 

COMMAND

NAVY 

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

Y

1430
Ser Pers852
23 Aug 01

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matter (PERS-OOXCB)

Subj:

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF

W?Q 
,.,

+,.,.

Ref:

(a) BUPERSINST 1430.163

Encl:

(1) BCNR File 

#04747-01

Based on policy and guidelines established in reference

1.
(a), enclosure  (1) is returned recommending disapproval.

PNSN Royal separated from Naval Service in May 1999.

2.
advancement date to PN3 was 16 December 1999.
of separation was prior to the effective date of advancement,
this office can not authorize the advancement be effected
upon her return to active duty of May 2001.

Her
Since her date



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08388-00

    Original file (08388-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive Your allegations of error and session, considered your application on 2 1 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03719-01

    Original file (03719-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. A requirement for advancement under the Accelerated As of when she was issued an advancement certificate, 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01153-01

    Original file (01153-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01398-01

    Original file (01398-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07809-01

    Original file (07809-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory 1, a copy of which is attached. Advancement to Chief Pett 2. by a selection board action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04327-01

    Original file (04327-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Office relief is recommended in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08710-00

    Original file (08710-00.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The fitness report in question is a Periodic/Regular report. The fitness report itself represents the opinions of the reporting senior. Chief as petitioned for advancement to Senior Chief Petty Officer due to a Fitness Report he believes to be unjust.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04627-01

    Original file (04627-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 200 1. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02186-01

    Original file (02186-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory 85/461 of 12 June 2001, a copy of opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07210-01

    Original file (07210-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...