Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01591-01
Original file (01591-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BJG
Docket No: 1591-01
27 June 2001

 

Dear Petty Officetjiiiaiialanaiai

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You requested Naval Reserve
retirement credit for 18 April 1997 to 28 April 1999.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 27 June 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 16 May 2001, a copy of which is
attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the

evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained

in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official

a
54-0 |

records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

¢

Enclosure

Copy to:
The Honorable Jo Ann Emerson
159)-0)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

 

5420
PERS-913
16 May 01

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via: Assistant for BCNR Matters, PERS-00ZCB

Subj]: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF

6 meen <1, galt

Ref: (a) Title 10, U.S.C. 1552
(b) BUPERSINST 1001.39 (series)

Encl: (1) BCNR File 4679-00

1. Enclosure (1) is forwarded with the following comments and
recommendations:

a. We do not suppore=@——iiiiMiliiieie cfetition. A review of

his record indicates that Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery
found him not physically qualified for retention in the Naval
Reserve on 2 July 1997. The Chief of Naval Personnel concurred
with those findings on 10 July 1997. On 6 May 1998 Naval Reserve
Center, Cape Girardeau requested a review of his status by the
President, Physical Evaluation Board. The President, Physical
Evaluation Board found gggeeeiliee@est Physically Qualified for
retention in the Naval Reserve on 21 April 1999. He was returned
to drill pay status on 28 April 1999. There does not appear to

be any intentional or undue delay in Process ing gga Tiatatilin

determination of physical qualification.

b. Per reference (b) aekaNIRpN RE was authorized to actively

participate via correspondence courses to earn retirement points
while in a not physically qualified status.

2. Additional questions may be directed ——— AAR at

  

Director, Naval Reserve Personnel
Administration Division

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03301-01

    Original file (03301-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S HD: hd Docket No: 03301-01 15 February 2002 Dear Command This is in reference to your application dated 20 April 2001 for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United States Code, section 1552, seeking removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 97 and 98 Lieutenant Commander Staff Selection Boards, and reinstatement to active duty as a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06215-01

    Original file (06215-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Our letter, s not physically qualified and directed Naval not physically disk on 27 Jan 00, "inform member in writing of reference (d), stated Reference Subj: REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF b. In response to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02243-01

    Original file (02243-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ~ l l members of the Ready Reserve (including the Individual Ready Reserve) are required by law to be considered by promotion boards, whether or not they are actively participating. Per Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter 1407, a lieutenant commander who has at least twice failed of selection and has completed 20 years of commissioned service must transfer to the Retired Reserve, if eligible, or be discharged. 0 was notified, per reference (c) , that he had become subject to the attrition...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05015-01

    Original file (05015-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 HD: hd Docket No: 0501501 15 October 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD USN Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. e. That any material or entries inconsistent with the Board ’s recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner ’s record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02984-01

    Original file (02984-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The fitness report for the period 1 November 1997 to 3 1 October 1998 is a Periodic/Regular report. The report for the period 1 November 1998 to 10 July 1999 is a The member alleges the reports are erroneous and c. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04348-01

    Original file (04348-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2001. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. HYT action until 31 December 1999. serbice, SK2 years of separation pay even i If eligible for RTB, SK2 retired pay at age 60.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02507-01

    Original file (02507-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested, in effect, removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 99 and 00 Naval Reserve Line Lieutenant Commander Selection Boards; that you be granted a special selection board for FY 99; that your discharge of 31 March 2000 from the Naval Reserve be set aside; that you be reinstated to the Inactive Status List lieutenant, with a date of rank adjustment to reflect seniority as if you had been placed on the ISL on 1 June 1998; and that your 16 June 1995 completion of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00511-01

    Original file (00511-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 5 April, 23 July and 16 August 2001, copies of which are attached. The member requests the removal of the following fitness reports. performance and making recommendations concerning promotion and assignment are the responsibilities of the reporting senior.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06189-00

    Original file (06189-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command, dated 22 November 2000, 15 February and 11 June 2001, and the Medical Corps Officer Community Manager dated 26 April 2001, copies of which are attached.The Board also considered your counsel’s letters dated 17 April and 18 September 2001. evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. However, this evidence, by itself, did not establish...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Jan 31 11_19_45 CST 2001

    i DSN Copy to: 21, 40) By direction o 703 614 9857.~2/ 2 .,~ 1920 PERS-911 ~7 JUN )999 SENT BY : IJSAED-CELMS-ED 7- 7-93 ;10:45AM COftS OF ENGINEERS— DEPARTMENT OF TH1 NAVY NAVY PISIONNIL COMMAND 17*0 ENTIOIITY DRIVI MILUNCTON TN 31055-0000 Comrnanc Personnel C From: To: Via: Subj: YOUR STATUS IN THE NAVAL RESERVE Ref: (a) SECNAVINST 1920.6A (b) COMNAVRESFORINST 1740.1 Per reference (a), an officer in the permanent grade of 1. lieutenant who has twice failed of selection for promotion to the...