Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02907-99
Original file (02907-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
D E P A R T M E N T  O F  T H E  N A V Y  
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 

2 NAW A N N U  

WASHINGTON DC  20370-51 00 

JLP: tj 
Docket No:  2907-99 
10 August  1999 

Dear  PETTY  OFFICER- 

This is in  reference to  your application for correction of  your naval record pursuant to the 
provisions of  title 10 of  the United  States Code, section  1552. 

A  threemember panel of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive 
session, considered  your application on  10 August  1999.  Your allegations of  error and  injustice 
were reviewed in  accordance with  administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary  material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together with all material submitted in  support thereof, your naval record  and 
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.  In  addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion furnished by  BUPERS Memorandum  1133 Ser 334106289 of  8 July  1999, a copy of 
which  is attached. 

After careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record,  the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was  insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accurclingly, your application has  been denied.  The m m c s  and  vutcb of 
the members of  the panel  will  be  furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted  that  the circumstances of  your case are such  that  favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider its decision upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard,  it is important 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval  record,  the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN  PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND 

5 7 2 0  INTEGRITY  DR. 

MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 38054-5057 

IN REPLY R E F E R  TO: 
1133 
Ser 334/06289 
8 Jul 99 

From:  Commander, Navy Recruiting Command 
To : 

Executive Director, Board for Correction of Naval 
Records 

Subj :  BCNR REQUEST ICO HT3 -, 

~. 

USN, 

Ref: 

(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 1130.8E 
(b) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST.1130.Ser 21c/000980 of 30 Oct 97 

Encl:  (1) BCNR Docket Nr. 02907-99 

1.  Recommend disapproval of enclosure  (1).  The maximum 
accession paygrade for NAVETS reenlisting for AECF, CTI(N) or the 
Nuclear Field is E4.  Waivers to enlist in a higher paygrade is 
not authorized.  Original record indicates HT3-signed 
was aware that his request to enlist in paygrade E5 was 
disapproved due to being overmanned at the E5 paygrade and he 
acknowledge that his reduction to E4 was permanent, and that he 
could not petition for reinstatement at any future date. 

and 

3.  This is an advisory memorandum fo,r use by the Board for 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01740-99

    Original file (01740-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00795-99

    Original file (00795-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01103-99

    Original file (01103-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered ,your application on 10 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04161-99

    Original file (04161-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07937-98

    Original file (07937-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a) , OSVETS will be enlisted in paygrade E-1 unless they meet reference (b) criteria for enlistment in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07207-98

    Original file (07207-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER 1999, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03950-99

    Original file (03950-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00056-99

    Original file (00056-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00137-99

    Original file (00137-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY FOR C0RRECTK)U OF NAVAL REcoRoS 2HAwAWmX WAGHINQTO(3 DC 201tOQlOo JLP: tj Docket No: 137-99 10 August 1999 USN Dear SEAMAN APPRENTICE -: naval -rd pursuant to the This is in reference to your application for correction of provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 155 1 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ecords, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Documentary material considered...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00094-02

    Original file (00094-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 .I LP: yrj Docket No: 94-02 18 June 2002 This is i n reference to your application t'or correction of your naval record p~rsuant to tlie provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, scctiori 1552. A three-memhel- panel of the 13oarcl for ('orrection of Naval Keco~ds, sitting in executive session, considered your application o...