D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
LCC: tj
Docket No: 6586-98
22 June 1999
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS Memorandum 1830 PERS 823 Ser 45 1 of 1 June 1999, a copy of
which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
WAVY P E R I O W W U C O Y Y A N D
5720 IWTE9RWY DRIVE
MILLIWOTON I N 38055-0000
1830
Pers823
Ser 45 1
1 Jun 1999
Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO - Ref:
(a) Pers-OOXCB ltr of 3 1 March 1999
NAVAL RECORDS
Encl: (1) BCNR File with Microfiche Service Record
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
1. Reference (a) requested comments and recommendations in subject member's case.
Specifically, Petitioner requests advancement to his highest paygrade held while on active duty,
which was E-6.
2. Public Law 100-1 80, enacted 4 December 1987 (now codified in 10, U. S. C. 6334),
provides for advancement on the retired list to the highest grade in which a member served on
active duty satisfactorily as determined by the Secretary of the Navy. Legal representatives of
the Judge Advocate General of the Navy have determined that only members who transfer to the
Fleet Reserve after 4 December 1987 are eligible for consideration to be advanced on the retired
list.
3. A review of the service record for Petty ~ f f i c e h i n d i c a t e s that he was transferred to
the Fleet Reserve effective 3 1 March 1980, and is not eligible for advancement to paygrade E6
on the retired list.
4. It is recommended that Petty ~ f f i c e e ~ e t i t i o n
denied as stated in pargraphs 3 and 4 above.
for correction to his records be
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
WAVY PERSONNEL COMMAWD
5 7 2 0 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MlLLlWQTON TW 3 8 0 5 5 - 0 0 0 0
5420
P~~s-OOZCB/NPC-OOZCB
31 MAR 99
MEMORANDUM FOR HEAD, ENLISTED RETIREMENT BRANCH (NPC-823)
Sub j :
Ref:
(a) 10 U.S.C. Section 1552
Encl: (1) BCNR File 06586-98 w/Service Record
1. Subject member petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct
errors and or remove injustices in the service record.
2. The Board requests your comments and recommendations in order
to reach a fair and equitable decision in this case. You are
therefore requested to review enclosure (1); weighing the issues
presented therein with applicable navy policies, regulations, and
guidelines, formulate an advisory opinion, and return all
correspondence to this office.
3. If during your review of enclosure (1) you determine an
administrative resolution, within the'scope and authority of the
Chief of Naval Personnel (CNP) is both available and appropriate,
alleviating the necessity for further BCNR intervention, you
should prepare a brief but formal commentary advising this office
of your action(s) .
4. If a formal review by BCNR is required, your comments and
recommendations should be prepared in a formal format, addressed
Executive Director, Board for C o r r e c t i o n of Naval Records
to
via Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOZCB, and returned to me in
the Jamie Whitten Building (791), room A104.
5. Your response is requested NLT 30 APR 99. Extensions may be
requested on 874-3043.
- -
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06695-98
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (I), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by granting him two more days of service, so that he will have a total of 24 years, rather than 23 years, 11 months and 28 days. Each month, all active duty service members receive a leave and earnings statement (LES) which shows their pay entry base date (PEBD). That Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00359-99
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 4 May 1999 with enclosure, a copy of which is attached. requested continuation in an active status in 2. captai- order to be considered by the FY-00 Naval Reserve 0-7 Line Promotion Board which convened on 8 February 1999. NPC-911 is responsible for Naval Reserve Continuation Boards.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03865-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 7220 PERS-823 of 2 July 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01374-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC1:yr.j Docket No: 1374-02 0 July 2002 is After careful evidence injustice. Extraordinary Heroism was sent to the Secretary of the Navy (board of Decorations and Medals) on 08 May 02. request was returned with the board recommendation that a request for determination of NOT BE accorded the. the Navy Pcrsonrzal the Navy approves the recommendation of the e-F.---__._ -.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08560-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting i n executive session, considered your application on 13 June 2002. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, theburden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The projection for her next in zone eligibility for captain puts her at the 23 year mark, which is also one year above the notional flow point and in accordance with SECNAVINST...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08438-01
When you were divorced in November 1999 the court ordered you to furnish your former spouse with SBP coverage. In response to reference (a), recommend the BCNR not correct Petty Officer -record changed his election under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) from spouse to former spouse coverage category within one year of his divorce. Additionally, a member who refuses coverage for an eligible spouse in favor of children only category is prohibited from electing spouse coverage at a later date...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08507-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 June 2002. The Board does not grant the naval flight officer (NFO) designator to an officer who has never held it, as they consider this a matter for cognizant naval authorities. He was promoted to the rank of Commander in November 2000 and has completed more than 18 years of qualifying service towards retirement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01184-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 7220 Pers 823 of 22 April 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9806586
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subject member petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and or remove injustices in the service record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01648-99
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 W JLP: tj Docket No: 1648-99 10 August 1999 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (I) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show...