Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03950-99
Original file (03950-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
D E P A R T M E N T  O F  T H E  N A V Y  
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 

2 NAVY ANNEX 

WASHINGTON DC  20370-5100 

JLP: tj 
Docket No:  3950-99 
24  August  1999 

This is in  reference to  your application for correction of  your naval  record  pursuant to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code,  section  1552. 

A three-member panel  of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive 
session, considered  your application on  24  August  1999.  Your allegations of  error and  injustice 
were reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together with  all  material submitted in  support thereof, your naval  record  and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion furnished by  BUPERS Memorandum  1133 Ser 3423106405 of  9 August  1999, a copy of 
which  is attached. 

After careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record, the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your application has been  denied.  The names and  votes of 
the  members of  the panel  will be  furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted  that the circumstances of  your case are such  that favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider its decision upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard, it is important 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval record, the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT O F  THE  N A W  

NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND 

5 7 2 0  INTEGRITY DR. 

MILLINGTON.  T E N N E S S E E  3 8 0 5 4 - 5 0 5 7  

IN REPLY REFER TO: 

From:  Commander, Navy Recruiting Command 
To : 

Executive Director, Board for Correction of Naval Records 

- 

Subj :  BCNR REQUEST ICO 

Ref: 

(a) COMNAVCRUITCOM ltr 1130 Ser ~ 1 3 2 ~ 4 / 9 ~ 9 7 7 6 0  

of 

18 OCT 99 

(b) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 1130.8E9(CRUITMAN-ENL) 

Encl:  (1) BCNR Docket Nr. 03950-99 

1.  Recommend disapproval of enclosure  (1).  Per reference  (a), 
OSVETS will be enlisted in pay grade E-1 unless they meet 
reference (b) criteria for enlistment in advanced pay grade E-2 
or higher. -record 
necessary criteria to warrant the advanced pay grade E-3. 

indicates he does not meet the 

2.  This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 
Correction of Naval Rec 

(1) is returned. 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01740-99

    Original file (01740-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00056-99

    Original file (00056-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04161-99

    Original file (04161-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01103-99

    Original file (01103-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered ,your application on 10 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00795-99

    Original file (00795-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06586-98

    Original file (06586-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WAVY P E R I O W W U C O Y Y A N D 5720 IWTE9RWY DRIVE MILLIWOTON I N 38055-0000 1830 Pers823 Ser 45 1 1 Jun 1999 Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO - Ref: (a) Pers-OOXCB ltr of 3 1 March 1999 NAVAL RECORDS Encl: (1) BCNR File with Microfiche Service Record MEMORANDUM...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02707-99

    Original file (02707-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07937-98

    Original file (07937-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a) , OSVETS will be enlisted in paygrade E-1 unless they meet reference (b) criteria for enlistment in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02907-99

    Original file (02907-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A threemember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Original record indicates HT3-signed was aware that his request to enlist in paygrade E5 was disapproved due to being overmanned at the E5 paygrade and he acknowledge that his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08115-98

    Original file (08115-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. -is not entitled to both NCF and EB, and therefore is no longer eligible for EB.