Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02707-99
Original file (02707-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
D E P A R T M E N T  O F  T H E  N A V Y  
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 

2 NAVY ANNEX 

WASHINGTON DC  20370-5100 

LCC: tj 
Docket No:  2707-99 
17 August  1999 

This is in reference to  your  application for correction of  your naval  record  pursuant to  the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code,  section  1552. 

A  three-member panel of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive 
session, considered  your application on  17 August  1999.  Your allegations of  error and  injustice 
were reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary  material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together with  all material submitted in  support thereof, your naval  record  and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion furnished by  BUPERS  Memorandum  1430 Ser 8521249 of  28 July  1999, a copy of 
which  is attached. 

After careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record,  the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was  insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred  with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Aczdingly, your application has bm:  denied.  The names and  votes of 
the  members of  the panel  will  be  furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of  your  case are such  that  favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider  its decision upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter not  previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard,  it is important 
to  keep in  mind  that a presumption  of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval  record, the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN  PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE N A V Y  

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 

5 7 2 0  INTEQRITY DRIVE 

MILLINGTON TN 3 8 0 5  5 - 0 0 0 0  

1430 
Ser 852/249 
28 Jul 99 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL 

RECORDS  (BCNR) 

Via:  Assistant for BCNR Matters  (PERS-OOXCB) 

Subi:  COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF 

Ref: 

Encl : 

BUPERSINST 1430.16D 

BCNR file #02707-99 

1.  Based on policy and guidelines established in reference  (a) 
enclosure  (1) is returned recommending disapproval. 

2.  Review of ; 
completed the 
no evidence that -was 
Without supporting documentation to support his advancement to 
Seaman 1st Class, 
disapproval. 

advanced to Seaman 1st Class. 

record indicates he 

1st Class, however there is 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03820-99

    Original file (03820-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08627-98

    Original file (08627-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ;ill material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. If a member is denied an opportunity to participate in a Navywide examination and if selected for advancement through participation in a subsequent examination, a member may request a backdated advancement. Therefore, no relief is recommended in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02898-99

    Original file (02898-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D C 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 ~130~1/132-99 19 JUL 99 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subi: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN USNR, Encl : BCNR File # 02898-99 with Microfiche Service Record 1. N130 recommends deny Seaman...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00463-99

    Original file (00463-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8521144 of 14 April 1999, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02168-99

    Original file (02168-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01669-99

    Original file (01669-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D C 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 N130Dl/ 141-99 03 AUG 99 NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10603-02

    Original file (10603-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03950-99

    Original file (03950-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01740-99

    Original file (01740-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04365-03

    Original file (04365-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...