Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03577-99
Original file (03577-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
D E P A R T M E N T  O F  T H E  N A V Y  
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 

2 N A W  ANNU( 

WASHINGTON DC  20370-5100 

JLP: tj 
Docket No:  3577-99 
24 August  1999 

This is in  reference to your application for correction of  your naval  record pursuant to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code, section  1552. 

A three-member panel of  the Board  for Correction  of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive 
session, considered  your application on  24  August  1999.  Your allegations of  error and  injustice 
were reviewed in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together with  all material submitted in  support thereof, your  naval  record and 
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.  In  addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion furnished by  BUPERS Memorandum 5420 Nl3OD 11 147-99 of  1 1 August  1999, a copy 
of  which  is attached. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of  the entire record,  the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your application has beer1  denid.  The names and  vutcs of 
the members of the panel  will  be  furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of  your case are such that  favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider  its decision  upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard, it is important 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval  record,  the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

D E P A R T M E N T   OF  THE  N A V Y  

O F F I C E   O F   T H E   C H I E F   O F   N A V A L   O P E R A T I O N S  

W A S H I N G T O N .   D C   2 0 3 5 0 . 2 0 0 0  

I N   R E P L Y   R E F E R   T O  

5420 
Nl3 0~1/147-99 
11 AUG 99 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Encl:  (1) BCNR File #03577-99 with microfiche service record 

1.  The following provides comments and recommendations on Petty 
office- 

petition. 

2 .   ~ 1 3  0 recommends d

e

n

0

 

. 

' 

p

S

3 .   . 
A
in a Navy Classification Coded  (NEC) 8426 billet, onboard USS 
JOHN C. STENNIS (CVN  74).  However, only personnel serving in an 
NEC 8426 billet who are working independent of a physician, nurse 

quests payment of Special Duty 
9

May 1997 to 01 May 1998 for serving 

 

s

an's assistant are authorized SDAP. 
uty assignment does not meet that 

therefore, he is not entitled to SDAP. 

4.  BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned 
herewith as enclosure  (1) . 

Assistant, Enlisted Bonus 

Program Branch 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03715-99

    Original file (03715-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01669-99

    Original file (01669-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D C 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 N130Dl/ 141-99 03 AUG 99 NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07664-98

    Original file (07664-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. D C 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 ~ 1 3 0D1/ 148-99 11 AUG 99 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF - NAVAL RECORDS Encl: (1) BCNR File # 07664-98 with Microfiche Service Record 1. N130 recommends deny receive an Enlistment Bonus (EB) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02898-99

    Original file (02898-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D C 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 ~130~1/132-99 19 JUL 99 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subi: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN USNR, Encl : BCNR File # 02898-99 with Microfiche Service Record 1. N130 recommends deny Seaman...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08115-98

    Original file (08115-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. -is not entitled to both NCF and EB, and therefore is no longer eligible for EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06586-98

    Original file (06586-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WAVY P E R I O W W U C O Y Y A N D 5720 IWTE9RWY DRIVE MILLIWOTON I N 38055-0000 1830 Pers823 Ser 45 1 1 Jun 1999 Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO - Ref: (a) Pers-OOXCB ltr of 3 1 March 1999 NAVAL RECORDS Encl: (1) BCNR File with Microfiche Service Record MEMORANDUM...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08786-98

    Original file (08786-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05982-01

    Original file (05982-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20370-5000 I N R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 02U0023 23 Jan 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05982-01 with microfiche service record petition. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07309-98

    Original file (07309-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Since you have been treated no differently than others who have been similarly detached, the Board finds no basis for removing the NJP...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03355-99

    Original file (03355-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. However, petitioner d i ; l not initia1l.y reenlist under the STAR program, because at the ti!r!,: of r=.enlistrnent, the STS rate was not. T h i s i s a n a d v i s o r y memorandum t o r e f e r e n c e ( a ) f o r t h e u s e by t h e Board f o r C o r r e c t i o n of Naval Records ( P N R ) o n p .