Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05982-01
Original file (05982-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE  NAVY 

B O A R D   F O R   C O R R E C T I O N   O F   N A V A L   R E C O R D S  

2  N A V Y A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

JLP:ddj 
Docket  No:  5982-01 
26  March  2002 

This is in  reference to your  application  for correction of  your  naval  record  pursuant to  the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the  United  States Code,  section  1552. 

A threemember panel  of  the  Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records, sitting in  executive 
session, considered your application  on  26  March  2002.  Your  allegations of  error and  injustice 
were reviewed  in  accordance with  adniinistrative regulations and  procedures applicable to  the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary  material  considered  by  the  Board  consisted of  your 
application,  together with  all  material  submitted in  support thereof,  your  naval  record  and 
applicable statutes,  regulations and  policies.  I n  addition, the  Board  considered  the advisory 
opinion furnished  by  NPC  men~oranduni 5420 N130D1/02U0023 of  23 January  2002, a copy of 
which  is attached. 

After careful and  conscientious consideration  of the entire record,  the  Board  found  that  the 
evidence submitted was  insufficient to  establish  the existence of  probable material  error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your application  has  been  denied.  The names and  votes of 
the  members of  the panel  will  be  furnished  upon  request. 

It is regretted  that  the circumstances of  your case are such  that  favorable action cannot be  taken. 
You  are entitled to  have the  Board  reconsider its decision  upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other  matter  not  previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard,  it  is important 
to keep  in  mind  that a presumption  of  regularity attaches to all official  records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval  record,  the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material  error or  injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN  PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE  dAVY 
BUREAU  O F   NAVAL  P E R S O N N E L  
W A S H I N G T O N .   D.C.  20370-5000 

I N   R E P L Y   R E F E R   TO 

5420 
N13 OD1 / 02U0023 
23 Jan 2002 

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Subj:  COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER 

Encl:  (1) BCNR case file #05982-01 with microfiche service record 

petition. 

1.  The following provides comment and recommendation on Petty 

3 .   Petty Officer - enlisted in the Navy through the 

Delayed Entry Program  (DEP) on 5 August 1999 and volunteered for 
the Nuclear Field Program School Guarantee.  In his petition, 
Petty office-refers 
to an erroneous Enlistment Bonus 
contract and requests favorable action that would allow payment 
of a $12,000 EB. 

2.  N130 recommends denial of Petty Office- 
for an Enlistment Bonus  (EB) . 

petition 

4.  EB payments are made upon completion of the required training, 
qualification in the skill for which the EB was granted, and 
continuation in that skill.  Since his petition, Petty Officer 

-has 

dropped out of the Nuclear Field Program and 

therefore is not entitled to the EB. 

5.  BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned 
herewith as enclosure  (1). 

Programs Branch 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00036-03

    Original file (00036-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Officer College Kicker EB contract in his service record and therefore is not entitled to a College Kicker EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06013-01

    Original file (06013-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all ~naterial submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 02110047 31 Jan 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj:...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05512-03

    Original file (05512-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material 'error or injustice. In accordance with BUPERS message 2011002 JUL 01 (message in effect at the time entering the Nuclear Field program and shipping to active duty between December 2001 and May...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00529-03

    Original file (00529-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. In his petition, Petty Officer was told at the Charlotte MEPS that he was not el He requests favorable action that will allow payment of an EB. Every recruit is not offc~ed n"l- r ~ c e i i r e ~ an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06423-01

    Original file (06423-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 02110026 23 Jan 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl : (1) BCNR case file #06423-01 with microfiche service record 1. N130 recommends denial of Seaman Enlistment Bonus (EB) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05042-01

    Original file (05042-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 2 October 2001 5042-01 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice were...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01420-03

    Original file (01420-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 Nl3 OD1 / 03110236 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS E CASE OF I Encl:...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06687-01

    Original file (06687-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. In his petition, Seaman-claims that an EB was erroneously left out of his contract and requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB. Seaman s processing electronic archived record reveals no offered EB quota.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00593-01

    Original file (00593-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N of which is attached. N130 recommends denial of Petty Officer 2. petition for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) . In his Id requests favorable action as disenrolled from he Electronics EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the Members who fail to complete basic including failure to graduate from and who do not continue in the skill for which The Navy offers an 4. discretion of recruiters and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00320-03

    Original file (00320-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 0 3 ~ 0 2 4 5 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN APPRENTICE . In his petition, Seaman Apprentice a requests favorable action that would allow payment of a $2,000 EB College Kicker.