D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 2037451 00
MEH: tj
Docket No: 3275-99
10 August 1999
This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse's naval record
pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse's naval record
and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum of 15 July 1999, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has heen denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05676-03
Based on information contained in his application, it is clear that-is not aware of the criteria or procedures required to withdraw from the SBP. Reference (b) also states, in part, that a retired member was permitted to discontinue participation in the SBP during the period 17 May 1998 to 16 May 1999. retired pay, his Program Manager Survivor Benefit Plan, Retired Activities and GI Bill Programs Branch (PERS-664) DEPARTMENT O F THE NAVY NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 5720 INTEGRITY...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06133-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per .reference (a) , recommend BCNR not correct -record Benefit Plan (SBP).
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01255-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In view of the above it is recommended that the request for removal of page 11 counseling entry be denir?d. We are asked to provide an opinion reg~rding Petitioner's request to remove a Page 11 counseling entry from his records.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08438-01
When you were divorced in November 1999 the court ordered you to furnish your former spouse with SBP coverage. In response to reference (a), recommend the BCNR not correct Petty Officer -record changed his election under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) from spouse to former spouse coverage category within one year of his divorce. Additionally, a member who refuses coverage for an eligible spouse in favor of children only category is prohibited from electing spouse coverage at a later date...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03838-99
application, together with all material applicable statutes, regulations and opinion furnished by CMC attached. ecords, sitting in executive allegations of error and injustice procedures applicable to the the Board consisted of your your naval record and considered the advisory 1999, a copy of which is After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire rekord, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03950-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03577-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03820-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03510-99
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC Memorandum 100111 MMEA-6, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Unfortunately, Stalff sergean- executed his reenlistment authority on 24 March 1999, as a Sergeant in PMOS 2531.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02907-99
A threemember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Original record indicates HT3-signed was aware that his request to enlist in paygrade E5 was disapproved due to being overmanned at the E5 paygrade and he acknowledge that his...