D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAW ANNEX
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20370-5100
JLP:ddj
Docket No: 8214-98
23 February 1999
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 23 February 1999. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1070/1 RE-21 of 3 February 1999, a copy of which is
attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive .Director
Enclosure
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MARINE CORPS RECRUITING C O M M A N D
3 2 8 0 R U S S E L L R O A D
QUANTICO VA 2 2 134-5 1 0 3
IN REPLY REFER TO
1070/1
RE-21
3 Feb 99
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj :
LANCE CORPORAL
Ref: (a) BCNR Docket #08214-98
(b) ALMAR 141/95
1. In response to reference (a), a review of SNM's petition for
s conducted.
correction- o
date of rank
A determinat
is correct.
the authority
of the Prior
(b) . His date of rank to lance corporal would be the day he came
back on active duty with promotion to corporal after 6 months
inclusive.
2 . Unlike prior service Marines who have a designated critical
PMOS on the prior service FTAP target list, PSEP Marines reenter
the first term force, not the career force. His request for the
reinstating or a back dated promotion to sergeant is denied.
'< ,
By direction
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07865-98
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. b. Petitioner complains that his platoon commander was the "judge" of his competency review board. MARINE CORPS serve on Petitioner's competency review board, no matter how much or how little he knew about Petitioner's case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00035-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 23 December 1998, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04214-99
Documentary material considera application, together with all material submitted in support tl applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC Memorandum 140013 MMPR-2 f 28 July 1999, a copy of which is attached. Per paragraph 2400.5 of the reference, I n eritorious promotions to PFC and LCpl effected under the provisions of Section 2 of Chapter 4 are not entitled to remedial adjustment of their effective dates...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03636-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 140013 MMPR-2 of 19 July 1999, a copy of which is attached. Per paragraph 1204.3 of reference (b), it states that the assignment to weight control is a promotion restriction, therefore he was not eligible for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00662-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00200-02
A three-member panel of tlie Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2002. In atltlirion, the Boartl consicleretl the advisory After careful and conscientious consi(leration of the entire record, tlie Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable ~naterial error or injustice. When he reenlisted back on ac:tive duty he was authorized the rank of Lance Corporal.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09980-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03074-03
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Doc ,et No: 3074-03 7 M a v 2003 This is in reference to your application for corr'ectlon of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title States Code, section 1552. of the United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07639-98
The new statements at enclosures (2) through (4) of your current application, among these a statement from the reviewing officer who acted on your fitness report at issue, did not persuade them that this report should be removed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, Major Performance Evaluation Review Board for removal from the record of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07204-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 January 1999. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 140013 MMPR-2 of 8 December 1998, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.