Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2001-132
Original file (2001-132.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 
Application for Correction of 
the Coast Guard Record of: 
                                                                                                            FINAL DECISION 
                                                                                                            BCMR Docket No. 2001-132 
XXXXX, XXXXXXX X. 
XXX XX XXXX, XXX 

 

 

SUMMARY OF THE RECORD 

 
GARMON, Attorney-Advisor: 
 
 
The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for six years on 
June  28,  1999,  his  tenth  anniversary  on  active  duty,  for  the  purpose  of  receiving  a  Zone  B  selective 
reenlistment bonus (SRB).  The applicant stated that on his tenth anniversary, he was never counseled 
about his eligibility to receive an SRB under ALDIST 184/99.  He alleged that if he had been properly 
counseled, he would have reenlisted for a period of six years.  On June 28, 1999, ALDIST 184/99 was in 
effect and authorized a Zone B SRB with a multiple of one for members in the BM rating.  There is no 
page 7 in the applicant’s record evidencing tenth anniversary counseling. 
 
 
the applicant’s request because the record supports the applicant’s allegations of error. 

On January 31, 2002, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant 

 

 
 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 

 
 
Under  COMDTINST  7220.33,  the  applicant  was  entitled  to  proper  counseling  concerning  his 
eligibility for an SRB.  The Board finds that the applicant has proved that he was not properly counseled 
and that, if he had been, he would have reenlisted for a period of six years on June 28, 1999 for a Zone B 
SRB under ALDIST 184/99.  Accordingly, relief should be granted. 
 

ORDER 

 
 
The application of XXX XXXXX X. XXXXXXX, XXX XX XXXX, USCG, shall be corrected to show 
that on June 28, 1999, he reenlisted for six years, through June 27, 2005 for an SRB under ALDIST 184/99.  
Any other reenlistment or extension contract he has signed since June 1999 shall be null and void.  The 
Coast Guard shall pay him the amount due as a result of this correction. 
 
 
 
 
 
Date 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
Astrid Lopez-Goldberg 

 
John A. Kern  

July 18, 2002 
 

 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
Coleman R. Sachs 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2000-039

    Original file (2000-039.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He alleged that if he had known about the requirement that he be in pay grade E-5 to receive a Zone B SRB, he would not have reenlisted for six years but would have 1 SRBs vary according to the length of each member’s active duty service, the length of the period of reenlistment or extension of enlistment, and the need of the Coast Guard for personnel with the member’s particular skills, which is reflected in the multiple used to calculate the bonus. Coast Guard members in pay grade E-5 and...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-111

    Original file (2002-111.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He alleged that he was never counseled about his eligibility to reenlist on his six-year anniversary and that, if he had been, he would have reenlisted for 6 years. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Under COMDTINST 7220.33, members are entitled to proper counseling concerning their eligibility to reenlist to receive a Zone A SRB under ALDIST 184/99 and such counseling must be documented in their records. Since there is no such documentation, the applicant has proven to the satisfaction of the Board...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-048

    Original file (2002-048.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Chief Counsel contended that the Board should find that the Coast Guard had no duty to counsel the applicant regarding the potential effect of his April 30, 1997 reenlistment on future SRB eligibility. of the Personnel Manual provides that members who receive PCS orders must be counseled about obligated service requirements and sign a page 7 documenting that counseling. The Board finds that if the applicant had received proper counseling, as urged by the Chief Counsel, the required...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-065

    Original file (2003-065.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He alleged that he was improperly counseled about his eligibility to extend his reenlistment within the 3 months prior to his 10th active duty anniversary (March 20, 2000) for a Zone B SRB. On March 14, 2000, the applicant was advised that he could receive a Zone B SRB by extending the 4-year reenlistment contact he signed on May 28, 1999, through May 27, 2003. He recommended that the Board grant relief by correcting the applicant’s record to show that he reenlisted on March 14, 2000, for...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2000-057

    Original file (2000-057.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT’S ALLEGATIONS The applicant stated that on his tenth active duty anniversary, he was eligible for an SRB and that, pursuant to Coast Guard regulations, he should have been counseled about his eligibility. Coast Guard members who have served between 6 and 10 years on active duty are in “Zone B.” Members may only receive one SRB per zone. VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On August 2, 2000, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant relief in this case.

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-080

    Original file (2003-080.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2003-080 SUMMARY OF THE RECORD The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for six years on February 23, 2003, his tenth active duty anniversary, to obtain a Zone B selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). The Board finds that had the applicant been properly counseled, he would have reenlisted on his tenth anniversary for six years to receive a Zone B SRB. ORDER The military record of XXX XXXXX XXXXX, xxx xx xxxx, USCG, shall be corrected to show that he...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-038

    Original file (2003-038.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He recommended that the Board grant the applicant’s requested relief by reenlisting the applicant for 4 years on February 23, 1999, his 6-year anniversary, for a Zone A SRB and reenlisting him for 6 years on February 23, 2003, his 10-year anniversary, for a Zone B SRB. The Board finds that, if he had been properly counseled, he would have reenlisted for 4 years on February 23, 1999 for a Zone A SRB and reenlisted again for 6 years on February 23, 2003 for a Zone B SRB. ORDER The military...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2000-024

    Original file (2000-024.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On June 26, 2000, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant the applicant’s request. (3) of Enclosure (1) to Commandant Instruction 7220.33 (Reenlistment Bonus Programs Administration) states that to be eligible for a Zone B SRB, a member must “[h]ave completed at least 6 but not more than 10 years active service on the date of reenlistment or the operative date of the extension.” Section 3.d. The Chief Counsel recommended that the Board...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-055

    Original file (2003-055.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his allegations, the applicant submitted a statement from his unit yeoman who acknowledged that the applicant’s paperwork was untimely processed and that the applicant received no SRB counseling. He recommended that the Board grant relief by correcting the applicant’s record to show that he reenlisted on January 4, 2003, for purposes of receiving a Zone B SRB pursuant to ALCOAST 329/02. The Chief Counsel admitted and the Board finds that the Coast Guard committed an error in...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2000-051

    Original file (2000-051.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Coast Guard members who have served 6 or less years on active duty are in “Zone A.” Members may only receive one SRB per zone. On January 21, 2000, the applicant extended his enlistment for one year, through VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On July 28, 2000, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant relief in this case. ORDER The application of XXXXXXXXXX, USCG, for correction of his military record is hereby granted as follows: His record shall be corrected to show...