Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2001-122
Original file (2001-122.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 
Application for the Correction of 
the Coast Guard Record of: 

 
 

 

ANDREWS, Deputy Chair: 

FINAL DECISION 
BCMR Docket No. 2001-122 

SUMMARY OF THE RECORD 

The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for 6 years 
on his 10th anniversary on active duty, March 5, 2001, instead of reenlisting on May 7, 2001.  He 
alleged that he was never counseled about his eligibility to reenlist on that day to receive the 
selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) in effect for his rating under ALCOAST 488/00.  He alleged 
that if he had been timely counseled, he would have reenlisted for 6 years to receive the SRB.  
He submitted a letter from his commanding officer confirming his allegation that he had not 
been counseled.  There is no documentation of 10th anniversary SRB counseling in his record. 
 

On  December  27,  2001,  the  Chief  Counsel  of  the  Coast  Guard  recommended  that  the 
Board grant the applicant’s request.  He argued that the record supports the applicant’s allega-
tion that he was not timely counseled about his eligibility to reenlist for the SRB. 
 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS  

Under COMDTINST 7220.33, the applicant was entitled to proper and timely counseling 
concerning ALCOAST 488/00 and his eligibility to reenlist for an SRB on his 10th anniversary.  
The record indicates that he was not counseled and that, if he had been, he would have reenlist-
ed for 6 years on March 5, 2001.  Accordingly, relief should be granted by correcting his record 
to show that he reenlisted for 6 years on March 5, 2001, and by voiding his subsequent contract.   

ORDER 

The military record of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, USCG, shall be corrected to show that he 
reenlisted  for  6  years  on  his  10th  active  duty  anniversary,  March  5,  2001,  to  receive  an  SRB 
under ALCOAST 488/00.  The reenlistment contract he signed on May 7, 2001, shall be null and 
void.  The Coast Guard shall pay him the amount due as a result of this correction. 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
James K. Augustine 

 

 

 
Murray A. Bloom 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
June 20, 2002 
Date 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
Betsy L. Wolf 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2006-043

    Original file (2006-043.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated September 28, 2006, is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, a boatswain’s mate first class (BM1), asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted on February 14, 2001, for a 6th anniversary1 selective reenlistment bonus (SRB).2 In addition, the applicant asked the Board to correct his 1 On a member’s 6th and 10th active duty anniversary, the member is eligible to reenlist for either a Zone A or a Zone B SRB if...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2001-106

    Original file (2001-106.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2001-106 Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX SUMMARY OF THE RECORD The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for six years prior to May 1, 2001, so that he would be eligible to receive an SRB (selective reenlistment bonus) with a multiple of 5 pursuant to ALCOAST 488/00. On November 16, 2001, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant the applicant’s request. If the applicant...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-016

    Original file (2002-016.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant asserted that if he had not accepted the PCS orders he could have received a short-term extension under ALCOAST 198/01 from August 27th to September 30, 2001, and reenlisted on October 1, 2001, for an SRB multiple of 2. The Chief Counsel stated that the applicant had to have a minimum of one year of obligated service remaining in the Coast Guard upon reporting to his new unit. The Coast Guard could not have counseled the applicant on ALCOAST 198/01 because it was not issued...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-154

    Original file (2002-154.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2002-154 SUMMARY OF THE RECORD The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted on his 10th anniversary on active duty, which he alleged was May 20, 2001, to receive a Zone B selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) in accordance with ALCOASTs 127/01 and 198/01. On his 10th active duty anniversary, February 26, 2001, ALCOAST 488/00 was in effect with no multiple for MKs in Zone B. (10) of Enclosure (1) to COMDTINST 7220.33 provides that “[t]ours of active duty in...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2001-093

    Original file (2001-093.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant argued that if ALCOAST 198/01 had been issued before he reenlisted on April 9, 2001, he would have elected to sign a short- term extension and reenlist in October 2001, at the E-7 pay grade to get a bigger SRB. VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On October 29, 2001, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board deny the applicant’s request. The Chief Counsel argued that the record indicates that the applicant purpose- fully chose to reenlist on April 9, 2001, three...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-143

    Original file (2002-143.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx FINAL DECISION BCMR Docket No. The Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant the appli- cant’s request because the record supports his allegation that he was not timely counseled. The Board finds that he was not timely counseled and that, if he had been, he would have reenlisted to...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-095

    Original file (2002-095.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In fact, throughout the four years during which the appli- cant was in Zone B, from March 5, 1997, through March 5, 2001, no Zone B SRB multiple was ever authorized for the MK rating.2 On July 16, 2001, after his command received notice that he was fit for full duty, the applicant was allowed to reenlist indefinitely in the Coast Guard. The applicant asked the Board to make certain corrections to his record so that, under ALCOAST 488/00, he would receive an SRB for a six-year...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-008

    Original file (2002-008.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated September 12, 2002 is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he was discharged, and immediately reenlisted for a period of six years on his tenth anniversary of military service1 for the purpose of receiving a Zone B selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). (1) of Enclosure (1) to the Commandant Instruction 7220.33 (Reenlistment Bonus Programs Administration) states that members with...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2001-008

    Original file (2001-008.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2001-008 Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: SUMMARY OF THE RECORD ANDREWS, Attorney-Advisor: The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for 6 years on May 1, 2000, his 10th anniversary on active duty. On March 7, 2001, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board correct the applicant’s record to show that he reenlisted for 6 years on his 10th anniversary. ORDER The military record of, shall be corrected to...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-102

    Original file (2002-102.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: XXXXXX, XXXXXX X. XXX XX XXXX, XXX FINAL DECISION BCMR Docket No. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Under COMDTINST 7220.33, the applicant was entitled to proper counseling concerning his eligibility to reenlist on his 10th active duty anniversary to receive an SRB under ALCOAST 127/01. Accordingly, relief should be granted by correcting his record to show that he...