DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
Application for the Correction of
the Coast Guard Record of:
BCMR Docket No. 2006-043
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
xxxxxxxxxx, BM1 (E-6)
FINAL DECISION
Author: Hale, D.
This is a proceeding under the provisions of section 1552 of title 10 and section
425 of title 14 of the United States Code. The Chair docketed the case on January 20,
2006, upon receipt of the applicant’s completed application.
appointed members who were designated to serve as the Board in this case.
This final decision, dated September 28, 2006, is signed by the three duly
APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS
The applicant, a boatswain’s mate first class (BM1), asked the Board to correct his
record to show that he reenlisted on February 14, 2001, for a 6th anniversary1 selective
reenlistment bonus (SRB).2 In addition, the applicant asked the Board to correct his
1 On a member’s 6th and 10th active duty anniversary, the member is eligible to reenlist for either a Zone A
or a Zone B SRB if one is authorized for his rating and the member has not already received one. The
member must be counseled about this opportunity, and the counseling must be documented on a Page 7.
COMDTINST 7220.33, Enclosure (1), Para. 3.d.
2 SRBs allow the Coast Guard to offer a reenlistment incentive to members who possess highly desired
skills at certain points during their career. SRBs vary according to the length of each member’s active
duty service, the number of months of service newly obligated by the reenlistment or extension of
enlistment contract, and the need of the Coast Guard for personnel with the member’s particular skills,
which is reflected in the “multiple” of the SRB authorized for the member’s skill/rating, which is
published in an ALCOAST. Coast Guard members who have at least 21 months but no more than 6 years
of active duty service are in “Zone A”, while those who have more than 6 but less than 10 years of active
duty service are in “Zone B”. Members may not receive more than one SRB per zone. Personnel Manual,
Article 3.C. and 3.C.4.a.
record to show that he reenlisted on February 14, 2005, for a 10th anniversary SRB. The
applicant alleged that he was never counseled regarding his eligibility to reenlist on his
6th or 10th anniversary for an SRB. The applicant further alleged that because he was
never counseled about his eligibility for a Zone A SRB, he received a Zone B SRB for his
April 25, 2001, reenlistment. He stated that because he received a Zone B SRB for his
April 2001 reenlistment, he was ineligible to receive another Zone B SRB on his 10th
active duty anniversary.
SUMMARY OF THE RECORD
On February 14, 1995, the applicant enlisted in the Coast Guard for a term of four
years, through February 13, 1999. On March 19, 1997, the applicant extended his
enlistment for 29 months to obligate service for transfer, with a new end of enlistment
(EOE) date of July 13, 2001. The applicant’s 6th active duty anniversary was February
14, 2001, and there is no Page 73 entry in the record to indicate that he received SRB
counseling prior to his 6th anniversary. The Page 7 would have informed him that he
was eligible to reenlist or extend his enlistment for up to six years to receive a Zone A
SRB pursuant to ALCOAST 488/00. On March 19, 2001, approximately one month after
his 6th anniversary, a Page 7 was placed in the applicant’s record to document that he
was eligible to reenlist for an SRB. On April 25, 2001, he reenlisted for four years,
through April 24, 2005, and received a Zone B SRB pursuant to ALCOAST 488/00.
On March 15, 2004, the applicant signed a 15-month extension contract extending
his enlistment to July 24, 2006. The applicant’s 10th anniversary was February 14, 2005,
and there is no Page 7 entry in the record to indicate that he received SRB counseling
prior to his 10th anniversary. ALCOAST 306/04 authorized a Zone B SRB for BMs on
that date. However, because the applicant had already received a Zone B SRB for his
April 25, 2001, reenlistment, he was not eligible for another. On April 18, 2006, the
applicant signed a 12-month extension contract, with an adjusted EOE date of July 24,
2007.
VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD
On June 6, 2006, the Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard submitted
an advisory opinion in which he recommended denying relief. He stated that the
applicant was properly counseled regarding his eligibility for a Zone B SRB for his April
25, 2001, reenlistment. The JAG noted that the applicant received a Zone B SRB because
on the date of his reenlistment he had more than six years of active service and was
ineligible for a Zone A SRB.
3 A CG-3307 (Administrative Remarks, or Page 7) entry documents any counseling that is provided to a
service member as well as any other noteworthy events that occur during that member’s military career.
RESPONSE TO THE VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD
On June 24, 2006, the Chair sent the applicant a copy of the JAG’s advisory
opinion and invited him to respond. The Chair did not receive a response.
APPLICABLE LAW
Article 3.C.3. of the Coast Guard Personnel Manual requires that all personnel
with 10 years or less of active service who reenlist or extend for any period shall be
counseled on the SRB program and shall sign a Page 7 outlining the effect that
particular action has on their SRB entitlement.
Article 3.C.11.2. of the Personnel Manual requires that a Page 7 entry regarding
counseling about SRB eligibility be made in a member’s record within three months
prior to his 6th and 10th anniversaries.
ALCOAST 488/00 was issued on December 21, 2000, and was in effect from
February 1, 2001, through April 30, 2001. Under ALCOAST 488/00, BM2s were eligible
for an SRB calculated with a multiple of one.
ALCOAST 306/04 was issued on June 21, 2004, and was in effect from August 1,
2004, through July 31, 2005. Under ALCOAST 306/04, BM1s were eligible for an SRB
calculated with a multiple of two.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The Board makes the following findings and conclusions on the basis of the
applicant's military record and submissions, the Coast Guard's submission, and appli-
cable law:
1.
The Board has jurisdiction concerning this matter pursuant to 10 U.S.C.
§ 1552. The applicant remains on active duty and thus his application was timely.4
2.
The applicant alleged that he was never counseled regarding his eligibility
to reenlist on his 6th active duty anniversary for an SRB. There is no Page 7 in the record
documenting counseling on his 6th anniversary as required under Article 3.C.11.2. of the
Personnel Manual. The lack of documentation of SRB counseling is persuasive evidence
that the applicant was never counseled about his opportunity to reenlist on his 6th
anniversary for a Zone A SRB. The Board notes that when the applicant was counseled
about SRBs one month after his 6th anniversary, the command documented the
counseling with a Page 7.
4 Detweiler v. Pena, 38 F.3d 591, 598 (D.C. Cir. 1994) (holding that section 205 of the Soldiers’ and Sailors’
Civil Relief Act of 1940 “tolls the BCMR’s limitations period during a servicemember’s period of active
duty”).
As a result of his command’s error, the applicant never received a Zone A
SRB, and received a Zone B SRB for his April 25, 2001, reenlistment. He did not receive
a Zone A SRB for the April 25, 2001, enlistment because he had more than six years of
active service, and pursuant to Article 3.C.4.a., to receive a Zone A SRB, the member
cannot have completed more than six years of active service. If the applicant had been
properly counseled prior to his 6th anniversary, he would have been told that, under
Chapter 3.C.11.2. of the Personnel Manual, he was eligible to reenlist on his 6th
anniversary for a Zone A SRB pursuant to ALCOAST 488/00. The applicant alleged
that if he had been told about his eligibility for an SRB on his 6th anniversary, then he
would have reenlisted for four years to receive a Zone A SRB, instead of reenlisting in
April 2001 for a Zone B SRB. The record indicates that the applicant reenlisted for four
years on April 25, 2001. Thus, it is reasonable to believe that he would have reenlisted
for four years on his 6th anniversary, February 14, 2001, for a Zone A SRB had he been
timely counseled. Therefore, his record should be corrected to show that he reenlisted
for 4 years on February 14, 2001, for a Zone A SRB, instead of on April 25, 2001, for a
Zone B SRB.
4.
If the applicant had reenlisted for four years on February 14, 2001, instead
of April 25, 2001, he would have been eligible to reenlist for a Zone B SRB on his 10th
anniversary, pursuant to ALCOAST 306/04.
5.
Accordingly, relief should be granted by voiding his April 25, 2001,
reenlistment contract, and by reenlisting him for four years on his 6th active duty anni-
versary, February 14, 2001, for a Zone A SRB pursuant to ALCOAST 488/00. In
accordance with paragraph four of Enclosure (1) to COMDTINST 7220.33, the Coast
Guard will be entitled to recoup the Zone B SRB that the applicant received for
reenlisting on April 25, 2001. In addition, relief should be granted by reenlisting him on
his 10th anniversary, February 14, 2005, for a term of three, four, five, or six years, at his
discretion, for a Zone B SRB pursuant to ALCOAST 306/04.
3.
[ORDER AND SIGNATURES APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE]
ORDER
The application of BM1 XXXXXXXXXXXX, xxxxxxxxxx, USCG, for correction of
his military record is granted. The Coast Guard shall correct his record by removing his
April 25, 2001, reenlistment contract as null and void, and by placing in his record a
four-year reenlistment contract dated February 14, 2001, for a Zone A SRB pursuant to
ALCOAST 488/00. In addition, the Coast Guard shall correct his record to show that he
reenlisted on his 10th anniversary, February 14, 2005, for a term of three, four, five, or six
years, at his discretion, for a Zone B SRB pursuant to ALCOAST 306/04. In accordance
with paragraph four of Enclosure (1) to COMDTINST 7220.33, the Coast Guard will be
entitled to recoup the Zone B SRB that he received for reenlisting on April 25, 2001.
The Coast Guard shall pay him any amount due pursuant to ALCOAST 488/00
and ALCOAST 306/04 as a result of these corrections.
Julia Andrews
H. Lee Einsel, Jr.
Kathryn Sinniger
On May 1, 2001, he reenlisted for another 3 years, with an EOE of April 30, 2004, and received a Zone B SRB with a multiple of 2. The JAG stated that although there is no evidence that the Coast Guard conducted the 10th anniversary counseling required by Article 3.C.11.2., the applicant is nonetheless ineligible for a Zone B SRB on his10th anniversary, because he already received a Zone B SRB for his May 1, 2001, reenlistment and he cannot receive a second Zone B SRB. In accordance with...
This final decision, dated February 10, 2005, is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record by voiding his 4-year reenlistment contract dated May 11, 2000, and replacing it with a 4-year reenlistment contract dated February 8, 2000, to receive a 6th active duty anniversary1 Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB).2 The applicant alleged that he was never counseled that he could reenlist on his 6th anniversary of active...
SRBs vary according to the length of each member’s active duty service, the number of months of service newly obligated by the reenlistment or extension of enlistment contract, and the need of the Coast Guard for personnel with the member’s particular skills, which is reflected in the “multiple” of the SRB authorized for the member’s skill/rating, which is published in an ALCOAST. On April 5, 2005, the JAG issued a supplemental advisory opinion in this case, in which he withdrew...
of the Coast Guard Training and Education Manual, before reporting to “A” school on January 22, 2000, she needed to obligate sufficient service — 19 more months — to complete the 14 weeks of school and have 26 months remaining on her enlistment upon completion of the school.3 Therefore, the applicant is entitled to have the term of her January 20, 2000, extension contract corrected to 19 months. The Board finds that if the applicant had been properly counseled regarding her SRB eligibility,...
SRBs vary according to the length of each member’s active duty service, the number of months of service newly obligated by the reenlistment or extension of enlistment contract, and the need of the Coast Guard for personnel with the member’s particular skills, which is reflected in the “multiple” of the SRB authorized for the member’s skill/rating, which is published in an ALCOAST. His record does not On July 1, 2007, the applicant reported for duty to Station Miami Beach, and on July 7th...
The Coast Guard erred when it counseled the applicant that he was eligible to receive a Zone B SRB for signing a six-year reenlistment contract on January 31, 2002. of the Personnel Manual, which show that a member’s SRB equals his monthly basic pay, multiplied by the SRB multiple authorized under the ALCOAST in effect, multiplied the number of months of service newly obligated under the contract, and divided by 12, if the appli- cant had reenlisted for four years on this 6th anniversary...
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. This final decision, dated April 21, 2005, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record by replacing his October 1, 2002, six-year extension contract with a reenlistment contract to receive a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)1 in accordance with ALCOAST...
Under Article 3.C.4.b.1., the first criterion for a Zone B SRB is that the member must “[r]eenlist not later than 3 months after discharge or release from active duty in a rating authorized an SRB multiple.” The JAG stated, however, that the applicant was eligible for a Zone B SRB on his tenth anniversary under ALCOAST 283/06 and that the lack of a Page 7 documenting SRB counseling for the anniversary supports the applicant’s allegation that he was not timely counseled. of the Personnel...
The applicant asserted that if he had not accepted the PCS orders he could have received a short-term extension under ALCOAST 198/01 from August 27th to September 30, 2001, and reenlisted on October 1, 2001, for an SRB multiple of 2. The Chief Counsel stated that the applicant had to have a minimum of one year of obligated service remaining in the Coast Guard upon reporting to his new unit. The Coast Guard could not have counseled the applicant on ALCOAST 198/01 because it was not issued...
This final decision, dated September 12, 2002 is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he was discharged, and immediately reenlisted for a period of six years on his tenth anniversary of military service1 for the purpose of receiving a Zone B selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). (1) of Enclosure (1) to the Commandant Instruction 7220.33 (Reenlistment Bonus Programs Administration) states that members with...