PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)
1. Character of Discharge: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 010126
3. Authority for separation:
a. Regulation: Chapter 10, AR 635-200
b. Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial
4. Prior review(s): NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review
1. Service data: 2. Awards and
decorations:
ARCOM (2) NCOPDR-2
a. Period entered for: 6 Years AAM (4) ASR
b. Entry date: 940830 GCMDL (3) OSR
c. Age: 28 Years DOB: 651108 NDSM NATO Medal
d. Educational level: HS Grad AFSM
e. Aptitude area score:
GT: 110 3. Highest grade
achieved:
f. Length of Service: E5
5 Years 5 Months 9 Days
4. Performance evaluations:
See OMPF (fiche)
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence:
Status Inclusive dates
AWOL 981122-990907
990914-991115
Mil conf
Civil conf
Other
6. Nonjudicial punishment:
Date Offense(s)
981015 Physically operated a passenger vehicle while drunk and in
a reckless manner by driving the wrong direction on a one-way
street (980531)(Field Grade)
7. Court-Martial data: NONE
a. SCM:
Date Offense(s)
b. SPCM:
Date Offense(s)
c. GCM:
Date Offense(s)
8. Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
Other discharge(s):
Service From To Type Discharge
USAR 851121 860120 NA
RA 860121 881220 Honorable
RA 881221 900528 Honorable
RA 900529 920206 Honorable
RA 920207 940829 Honorable
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
a. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was reported
AWOL, effective 22 November 1998 and DFR’d on 22 December 1998. On 7
September 1999, the applicant surrendered to the military authorities at
Fort Know, Kentucky. He was subsequently transferred to the Personnel
Control Facility (PCF) at the same location for further processing. On 14
September 1999, he again departed AWOL and subsequently DFR’d. On 15
November 1999, he again surrendered to the military authorities at Fort
Knox, Kentucky and assigned to the local PCF. On 13 December 1999, the
applicant was charged with AWOL from 22 November 1998 – 7 September 1999
and from 14 September – 15 November 1999. On 13 December 1999, the
applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in
writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter l0, AR 635-200 in lieu
of trial by court-martial. In this request, the applicant admitted guilt
to the offense, or a lesser-included offense. Further, the applicant
indicated that he understood that he could receive an under other than
honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a
significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits. The applicant
did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 14 December 1999, the
applicant was placed on excess leave pending completion of his
administrative discharge proceeding under Chapter 10, AR 635-200. The unit
commander recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions
discharge. On 19 December 2000, the separation authority approved the
discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge and
reduction to Private E-1.
b. 26 January 2001, the applicant was discharged. At the time of
discharge, the applicant had completed 5 years, 5 months, and 9 days of
active military service (which included 410 days of excess leave), and
accrued 352 days of lost time in the period under review. He had a total
of 14 years and 15 days of total military service.
2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member
who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized
punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a
discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
The requests may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred
and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. Army policy states
that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge
under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS
1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:
A-1: DD Form 293, dated 040305, with no enclosures.
A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
B-l: Other Documents: NONE
PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)
SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor
a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):
b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING
SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits
1. Review/hearing information:
a. Type requested:
( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
b. Type Held:
( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
( ) Tender Offer
c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 3 November
2004.
d. Appearance by:
Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No
e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS
1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
of this case report and directive.
( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
follows:
( ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
follows:
b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:
a. Propriety: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
Paragraph 1, above.
(1) The issue is rejected. The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as
well as infraction of discipline, the extent thereof, and the seriousness
of the offenses. The Board noted the applicant’s contentions; however, the
Board determined that his contentions were not sufficiently mitigating to
warrant an upgrade of the discharge under review. The evidence of record
shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense
punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a
punitive discharge. The Board noted that, after consulting with defense
counsel, the applicant voluntarily, and in writing, requested separation
from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. In doing so, the
applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser-included offenses
under the UCMJ. The Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and
regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected
throughout the separation process. It also noted that the characterization
of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than
honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to
requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for
discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and
equitable, voted to deny relief.
b. Equity: The applicant has not submitted an issue of equity
and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of
equity to change the discharge. The major factors upon
which the discharge was based are set forth in Parts III
and IV of this decisional document.
3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote
1. Board conclusion(s):
The discharge was:
( X ) Proper.
( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( X ) Equitable.
( ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
.
( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
under .
( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
be changed to under
.
2. Voting record: Change No Change
Reason 0 5
Characterization 2 3
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.
Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508
3. Minority views: NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication
Case report reviewed and verified
Ms. McKim-Spilker
Case Reviewing Official
PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION
Approval Authority:
ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant
INDEX RECORD:
AR Number: 2004105214 INDEX NUMBERS: A0101
Date of Review: 041103 A9217
Character of Service: UD A9231
Date of Discharge: 010126
Authority: AR 635-200 C10
Reason: A7100
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: NC 3-2 A
PART IX - VOTING RECORD
Name Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC
UNCHAR
1. Mbr X X
2. Mbr X X
3. Mbr X X
4. Mbr X X
5. PO X X
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004104925
It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. RIVERA Case...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040000871
Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of service to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority. ( X ) Change reason and authority for discharge to Secretarial Authority, AR 635-200. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040000180
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Minority...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040002271
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, by reason of in lieu of trial by court-martial, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040004837
On 21 September 1999, the proper legal authority reviewed the applicant’s request for discharge and found no legal objections to further processing. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004106198
Voting record: Change No Change Reason 5 0 Characterization 5 0 The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. ( X ) Change reason and authority for discharge to Secretarial Authority, AR 635-200. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004105222
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040000959
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. On 26 May 1995, the applicant was discharged. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040002081
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. SECTION B -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004106741
Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge RA 930916 960227 Honorable PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant Colonel, U.S....