PART II - APPLICATION DATA

      (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1.  Character of Discharge:  Under Other Than Honorable Conditions

2.  Date of discharge (or REFRAD):  000915

3.  Authority for separation:

      a.  Regulation:  Chapter 10, AR 635-200

      b.  Reason:  In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial

4.  Prior review(s):  NONE



                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

                 SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.    Service data:                              2.  Awards and
    decorations:
                                           NONE
    a.  Period entered for:  19 Weeks
    b.  Entry date:  981004
    c.  Age:  17 Years   DOB:  800930
    d.  Educational level:  HS Grad
    e.  Aptitude area score:
          GT:  102                               3.  Highest grade
achieved:
    f.  Length of Service:                         E1
          1 Year  4 Months  28 Days

                                               4.  Performance evaluations:

                                                   NONE

                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
           SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5.  Periods of unauthorized absence:

    Status       Inclusive dates
      AWOL         990108-990109
                 990115-990725

      Mil conf

      Civil conf

      Other


6.  Nonjudicial punishment:  NONE

      Date  Offense(s)



7.  Court-Martial data:  NONE

      a.  SCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      b.  SPCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      c.  GCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


8.    Remarks:  NONE


                       SECTION B - Prior Service Data


Other discharge(s):

      Service    From  To    Type Discharge
      ARNGUS     980729      981003     NA




                         PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

                       SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l.  Facts and Circumstances:

      a.  Evidence of record shows that on 29 July 1998, the applicant
enlisted in the Army National Guard for an unknown period.  On 4 October
1998, he was ordered to initial active duty for training (IADT) for a
period of approximately 19 weeks or completion of basic and MOS training.
On 19 December 1998, while at IADT, he departed on authorized ordinary
leave.  On 8 January 1999, having failed to return from leave, the
applicant was reported AWOL, until his return to duty on 10 January 1999.
On 15 January 1999, he again departed AWOL and subsequently DFR’d on 14
February 1999.  On 26 July 1999, the applicant was apprehended by the
civilian authorities at Davidson, CT and returned to military control on
the same day.  On 29 July 1999, the applicant was transferred to the
Personnel Control Facility (PCF) at Fort Knox, KY for further processing.
On 3 August 1999, the applicant was charged with AWOL from 15 January – 26
July 1999.  On 3 August 1999, the applicant consulted with legal counsel
and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of
Chapter l0, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In this request,
the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser-included offense.
Further, the applicant indicated that he understood that he could receive
an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge
would have a significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits.  The
applicant did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  On 4 August 1999,
the applicant was placed on excess leave pending completion of his
administrative discharge proceeding under Chapter 10, AR 635-200.  On 21
April 2000, the unit commander recommended approval of an under other than
honorable conditions discharge.  On 29 May 2000, the separation authority
approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions
discharge.

      b.  On 15 September 2000, the applicant was discharged.  At the time
of discharge, the applicant had completed 1 year, 4 months, and 28 days of
active military service (which included 409 days of excess leave), and
accrued 144 days of lost time in the period under review.  He had a total
of 1 year, 7 months, and 3 days of total military service.

2.  Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action:  Army Regulation 635-200
sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member
who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized
punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a
discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
The requests may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred
and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.  Army policy states
that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge
under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.


                      SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


1.  Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
    As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted:

      A-1:  DD Form 293, dated 040407, with no enclosures.
      A-2:  Counsel Issues:  NONE
      B-l:  Other Documents: NONE
                   PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

              SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor      ( ) Legal Advisor



      a.  Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):


      b.  Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):











                         PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

                      SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1.  Review/hearing information:


      a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review             (   ) Hearing

      b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review              (   ) Hearing
                                          (   ) Tender Offer

      c. Review/hearing location and date:  Washington, DC on 8 December
2004.

      d. Appearance by:
         Applicant                 (   ) Yes   ( X ) No
         Counsel                   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      e.  Applicant testified:     (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      f.  Counsel presentation:    (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      g.  Witness(es) testified:   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
                        PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1.  a.  Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )  Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
              of this case report and directive.
          (   )  Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
              follows:
          (   )  Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
              follows:

      b.  Request:  ( X ) Recharacterization     (   ) Change of Reason

2.  Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:

      a.  Propriety:   The applicant has not submitted an issue of
                   propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
                   issue of propriety to change the discharge.

      b.  Equity:      The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
                   the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
                   Paragraph 1, above.

        (1)  The issue is rejected.  The Board carefully examined the
applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review.
 There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as
well as the infractions of discipline, the extent thereof, and the
seriousness of the offenses.  The Board noted the applicant’s contentions;
however, did not find said contentions sufficiently mitigating to overcome
the serious misconduct that led to the applicant’s voluntary request for
separation in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The evidence of record shows
the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable
under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive
discharge.  The Board noted, after consulting with defense counsel, the
applicant voluntarily, and in writing, requested separation from the Army
in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In doing so, the applicant admitted
guilt to the stipulated or lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ.  The
Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met
and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the
separation process.  It also noted that the characterization of service for
this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions
and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the
characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny
relief.

3.  Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):  NONE

                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                   SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.    Board conclusion(s):

      The discharge was:

      ( X ) Proper.
      (   ) Improper as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                               .
      (   ) Improper as to reason.  Change reason to
                                   under                      .

      ( X ) Equitable.
      (   ) Inequitable as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                         .
      (   ) Inequitable as to reason.  Change reason to
                                 
            under                                 .
      (   ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
           separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
           be changed to                      under
                                   .

2.  Voting record:      Change   No Change
                  Reason       0         5
    Characterization       0         5

        The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below.  The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.

                  Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
                  ATTN:  Promulgation Team
                  1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
                  Arlington, VA  22202-4508



3.  Minority views:  NONE
                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                 SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified

                          
MR. RIVERA
Case Reviewing Official

                     PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
                            SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

                                    NONE

                          SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
   Review Board

Official:




MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge                  C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number:  20040000180                   INDEX NUMBERS:  A9235
Date of Review:  041208                                   A9309
Character of Service:  UD                                 A0113
Date of Discharge:  000915
Authority:  AR 635-200 C10
Reason:  A7100
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation:  NC 5-0 A













                           PART IX - VOTING RECORD

    Name                                   Reason          Characterization
                                           CHANGE   NC     HON  UHC   NC
UNCHAR

    1.      Mbr          X                 X       

    2.      Mbr          X                 X       

    3.      Mbr          X                 X       

    4.      Mbr          X                 X       

    5.      PO           X                 X