DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
                         Army Discharge Review Board
                           1901 South Bell Street
                          Arlington, VA  22202-4508
                                1 April 2005


Office of the President



      The Army Discharge Review Board reviewed your case and determined
that relief is warranted.  The Board has directed the ARBA Support
Division, St. Louis, MO, to take action as indicated on the enclosed OSA
Form 172, Case Report and Directive.  This document reflects the findings,
conclusions, and reasons for the Board's decision.  The official
notification of any change to your official military personnel record,
including the appropriate documentation, will be mailed to you by the ARBA
Support Division.

      If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not
responsive to the issues raised, or does not otherwise agree with the
decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a
complaint in accordance with Enclosure 5 of that directive.  You should
read Enclosure 5 of that directive before submitting a complaint.  The
complaint procedure does not permit you to challenge the merits of the
decision, but is designed solely to ensure that the decisional document
meets applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness.  You may
obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to:  DA Review Boards
Agency, Attention:  (Reading Room), The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310-
1809.

      You may reapply to the Army Discharge Review Board for a personal
appearance hearing and/or you may apply to the Army Board for Correction of
Military Records.  Enclosed are the necessary applications for requesting a
review from both boards.  If you choose to apply to the Army Board for
Correction of Military Records you must do so within three years from the
date of this letter.

      Should you have any questions relating to the documentation
implementing the Board's decision, you should contact:  ARBA Support
Division, ATTN:  SFMR-RBL-SL, 9700 Page Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri, 63132-
5200.

                                  Sincerely,



                                  Robert L. House
                                  Colonel, U.S. Army
                                  President


Enclosure


                           MILITARY REVIEW BOARDS

                           Case Report & Directive


                        PART I - IDENTIFICATION DATA

NAME:       ADDRESS:



      PHONE:




COUNSEL:    ADDRESS:


      PHONE:




ALTERNATE PERSON(S) TO BE NOTIFIED:     ADDRESS:

RELATIONSHIP:                     PHONE:



TYPE REPORT:

   ( X ) Original
   (   ) Addendum




                                   REMARKS
                            Case Management Data

( X )  Response to other correspondence required upon completion of case.

(   )  DD Form 149 in file.  Send case to ABCMR.


















OSA FORM 172 (REVISED) 22 May 98     Cover Sheet
                         PART II - APPLICATION DATA

      (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1.  Character of Discharge:  Under Other Than Honorable Conditions

2.  Date of discharge (or REFRAD):  930930

3.  Authority for separation:

      a.  Regulation:  Chapter 5, AR 635-120

      b.  Reason:  Conduct Triable by Court-Martial

4.  Prior review(s):  NONE



                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

                 SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.    Service data:                              2.  Awards and
    decorations:
                                           ARCOM(4th Awd)
    a.  Period entered for:  Indef                 AAM(2nd Awd)
    b.  Entry date:  810621                        NDSMw/1BSS)
    c.  Age:  24 Years   DOB:  560722              AFRM


    d.  Educational level:  Other (D.D.S.)         ASR


    e.  Aptitude area score:                       OSR
          GT:  N/A                               3.  Highest grade
achieved:
    f.  Length of Service:                         05
          12 Year(s)  3 Month(s)  10 Day(s)


                                               4.  Performance evaluations:

                                                   See OMPF

                         PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
           SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5.  Periods of unauthorized absence:  NONE

    Status       Inclusive dates
      AWOL

      Mil conf

      Civil conf

      Other


6.  Nonjudicial punishment:

      Date  Offense(s)

_____________________________
      930708     GOLOR – Shoplifting $22 sweatshirt

7.  Court-Martial data:  NONE

      a.  SCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      b.  SPCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


      c.  GCM:
            Date   Offense(s)


8.    Remarks:  Total time in service calculated using DD Form 214.  Prior
              inactive service dates not available in record.

                       SECTION B - Prior Service Data
                                    NONE

Other discharge(s):

      Service    From  To    Type Discharge





                         PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

                       SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l.  Facts and Circumstances:

      a.  The evidence of record shows that on 8 July 1993, the applicant
was charged with disrespect to a superior officer; stealing a sweatshirt
from AFEES; and, stealing military property, 18 specifications.  On 21 July
1993, the applicant voluntarily tendered his resignation from the Army for
the good of the Service under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-120.  The
appropriate authorities reviewed the proposed discharge action and
recommended approval with an under other than honorable conditions
discharge.  On 2 September 1993, the Ad Hoc Review Board recommended that
the applicant’s resignation for the good of the service be accepted with
issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  On 2
September 1993, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards)
approved the recommendation of the Ad Hoc Review Board that resignation for
the good of the service be accepted with discharge under other than
honorable conditions.

      b.  On 30 September 1993, the applicant was discharged.  At the time
of discharge, the applicant had completed 12 years, 3 months, and 10 days
of active military service in the period under review and had a total of 16
years, 5  months and 29 days of military service.

2.  Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action:  Army regulation 635-120,
in effect at the time, prescribed the procedures for the resignation of
USAR commission officers on active duty.  Chapter 5 allowed for an officer
to submit a resignation for the good of the Service (RFGOS) in lieu of
court-martial.  An officer separated under this paragraph normally receives
characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions or under
other than honorable conditions.




                      SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


1.  Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
    As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted:

      A-1:  DD Form 293, dated 040801, with multiple enclosure(s).
      A-2:  Counsel Issues:  NONE
      B-l:  Other Documents: NONE


                   PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)

              SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor      ( ) Legal Advisor



      a.  Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):


      b.  Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):











                         PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING


                      SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits


1.  Review/hearing information:


      a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review             (   ) Hearing

      b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review              (   ) Hearing
                                          (   ) Tender Offer

      c. Review/hearing location and date:  Washington, D.C. on 30 March
2005.

      d. Appearance by:
         Applicant                 (   ) Yes   ( X ) No
         Counsel                   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      e.  Applicant testified:     (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      f.  Counsel presentation:    (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

      g.  Witness(es) testified:   (   ) Yes   ( X ) No

2.  Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:
                        PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1.  a.  Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )  Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A
              of this case report and directive.
          (   )  Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as
              follows:
          ( X )  Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as
              follows:

        Board Issue:  (6)  The characterization of service is too harsh.

      b.  Request:  ( X ) Recharacterization     ( X ) Change of Reason

2.  Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on
issues of propriety and/or equity:

      a.  Propriety:   The applicant has not submitted an issue of
                   propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an
                   issue of propriety to change the discharge.

      b.  Equity:      The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to
                   the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI,
                   Paragraph 1, above.

        (1-5)  The issues are rejected.  The Board carefully reviewed the
applicant’s record during the period of service under review.  The evidence
of record shows that the applicant was charged with the commission of
offenses punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice with a
punitive discharge.  The applicant voluntarily requested resignation in
lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-
120.  The Board noted the applicant’s contentions; however, his contentions
relate to evidentiary and procedural matters which should have been raised
and conclusively adjudicated at the time of his discharge, and furnish no
basis for a change in his reason for discharge.  The Board found that the
reason for discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted not to change
it.   See response to issue (6), below.

        (6)  The issue is accepted.  The Board does not condone the
applicant’s misconduct; however, determined that the characterization of
service is now inequitable.  Notwithstanding the propriety of the
applicant’s discharge, the Board found that the applicant’s misconduct was
partially mitigated by the overall length and quality of his service; the
time elapsed since his discharge; and, the evidence of exemplary post-
service conduct and achievements.  In view of the foregoing, the Board
voted to grant partial relief in the form of an upgrade to the
characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions.  The
Board determined that the applicant’s misconduct diminished the quality of
his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.

3.  Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):  NONE

                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                   SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.    Board conclusion(s):

      The discharge was:

      ( X ) Proper.
      (   ) Improper as to characterization.  Change characterization to
                                               .
      (   ) Improper as to reason.  Change reason to
                                   under                      .

      (   ) Equitable.
      ( X ) Inequitable as to characterization.  Change characterization to
           General, Under Honorable Conditions.
      (   ) Inequitable as to reason.  Change reason to
                                 
            under                                 .
      (   ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for
           separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should
           be changed to                      under
                                   .

2.  Voting record:      Change   No Change
                  Reason       0         5
    Characterization       4         1

        The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in
Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address
below.  The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right
corner of this document.

                  Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
                  ATTN:  Promulgation Team
                  1901 South Bell Street, 2nd Floor
                  Arlington, VA  22202-4508



3.  Minority views:  NONE
                           PART VII - BOARD ACTION
                 SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified

                          
Ms. McKim-Spilker

Case Reviewing Official

                     PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
                            SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis      Date:  1 April 2005

     The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of
Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as
Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant
named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new
DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed
change(s):

           ( X ) Change characterization of discharge to General, Under
                 Honorable Conditions.


                          SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


ROBERT L. HOUSE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
   Review Board

Official:




MARY E. SHAW
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge                  C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AR Number:  20040005588                   INDEX NUMBERS:  A9406
Date of Review:  050330                                   A9218
Character of Service:  UD                                 A9222
Date of Discharge:  930930                                A0101
Authority:  AR 635-120 C5
Reason:  A8000
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation:  GD 4-1 A







                           PART IX - VOTING RECORD

    Name                                   Reason          Characterization
                                           CHANGE   NC     HON  UHC   NC
UNCHAR

    1.      Mbr          X                 X       

    2.      Mbr          X            X            

    3.      Mbr          X            X            

    4.      Mbr          X            X            

    5.      PO           X            X