Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003087752
Original file (2003087752.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
PART II - APPLICATION DATA

(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1. Character of Discharge: General, Under Honorable Conditions

2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 900306

3. Authority for separation:

         a. Regulation: Chapter 5, AR 635-120

          b. Reason: Conduct Triable By Court-Martial
4. Prior review(s): NONE


PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

 1.       Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
                            MSM
a. Period entered for: Indefinite ARCOM
b. Entry date: 750315 ASR
c. Age: 24 Years DOB: 500804 OSR
d. Educational level: Post-Grad
e. Aptitude area score:
          GT: (NIF) 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Length of Service: O4
14 Year(s) 11 Month(s) 22 Day(s)

4. Performance evaluations:
See OMPF

PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE

 Status Inclusive dates
         AWOL

         Mil conf

         Civil conf

         Other


6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE
         Date     Offense(s)
        


7. Court-Martial data: NONE
         a. SCM:
                  Date Offense(s)

        
         b. SPCM:
                  Date Offense(s)

         c. GCM: 
                  Date Offense(s)


8.       Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
NONE

Other discharge(s):

          Service   From      To        Type Discharge
         ROTC     741214   750314   NA



PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:
         a. The evidence of record shows that on 4 October 1989, the applicant was charged with two specifications of violation of Article 111, UCMJ, (i.e., operating a passenger car while drunk and causing said vehicle to injure a person, and driving a passenger car with two bald tires in a reckless manner by driving at excessive speed for wet road conditions and causing said vehicle to injure a person. On 6 December 1989, the applicant voluntarily tendered his resignation from the Army for the good of the Service under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-120, by reason of Conduct Triable by Court-Martial. The appropriate authorities reviewed the proposed separation action and recommended approval with an honorable discharge. On 11 January 1990, the Ad Hoc Review Board recommended that the applicant’s resignation for the good of the service be accepted with issuance of an honorable discharge. On undated, having considered the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) accepted the applicant’s resignation for the good of the service; however, directed issuance of a general, under honorable conditions discharge.

         b. On 6 March 1990, the applicant was discharged. At the time of discharge, the applicant had completed 14 years, 11 months, and 22 days of active military service in the period under review and had a total of 15 years, 2 months and 28 days of active military service.

2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action : Army regulation 635-120, in effect at the time, prescribed the procedures for the resignation of commission officers. Chapter 5 allowed for an officer to submit a resignation for the good of the Service (RFGOS) in lieu of court-martial. An officer separated under this paragraph normally receives characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions or under other than honorable conditions.
SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS

1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:

         A-1: DD Form 293, dated 020825, with one enclosure.
         A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
         B-l: Other Documents: NONE

PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)



SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor



 a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):

b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1. Review/hearing information:

         a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing

         b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
         ( ) Tender Offer

         c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 24 September 2003 .

         d. Appearance by:
         Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
         Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No

          e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
         f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
         g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:

PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )   Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive.
         ( )     Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
          ( X )   Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:

Board Issue: (2) The characterization of service is too harsh.

         b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason
2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:

          a. Propriety:    The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.
         b. Equity:       The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above.

 (2) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period under review. There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as well as the infractions of discipline, the extent thereof, and the seriousness of the offenses. The Board does not condone the applicant’s misconduct; however, determined that the characterization of service is inequitable. The Board noted that the applicant’s misconduct, although serious, was isolated in nature and was an aberration in an otherwise noteworthy record. The Board also noted that the entire chain of command and the Army Ad Hoc Review Board recommended that the applicant’s resignation be accepted with an honorable discharge. In view of the foregoing, the Board voted to upgrade the applicant’s characterization of service to fully honorable. However, the Board found that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and voted not to change it.

(1) See Paragraph 3, below.

 3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s):

Inasmuch as the Board voted to grant the full relief requested, response to the remaining issue is neither required nor rendered.

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.       Board conclusion(s):

         The discharge was:

          ( X )    Proper.
         ( )      Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to                                      .
         ( )      Improper as to reason. Change reason to                         under                       .

         ( )      Equitable.
         ( X )    Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to Honorable .
         ( )      Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to                       
                  under                                  .
         ( )      Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                      under                          .
2. Voting record: Change No Change
         Reason 0 5
Characterization 5 0

         The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.

Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508



3. Minority views: NONE

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified       

                                 
MR. RIVERA
Case Reviewing Official 

PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

 TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 26 September 2003

The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed change(s):

( X )   Change characterization of discharge to
Honorable.

SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


SPURGEON A. MOORE
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board

Official:




JOHN F. LONG
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge          C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

 AR Number: 2003087752 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406
Date of Review: 030924 A9218
Character of Service: GD A0113
Date of Discharge: 900306
Authority: AR 635-120 C5
Reason: A8000
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: HD 5-0 A








PART IX - VOTING RECORD



 Name  Reason Characterization
 CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR

1.      Mbr      X  X           

2.      Mbr      X  X           

3.      Mbr      X  X           

4.      Mbr      X  X           

5.      PO      X  X           






Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000044610

    Original file (2000044610.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. An officer separated under this paragraph normally receives characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions or under other than honorable conditions. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000036892

    Original file (2000036892.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change (1), (2), (3), (4), and (5) The issues are rejected. ( X ) Change characterization of service to General, Under Honorable Conditions. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003093001

    Original file (2003093001.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Prior review(s): Records/980402 PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. On 27 October 1988, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board and directed that the applicant be discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. On 16 December 1988, the applicant was discharged.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000035534

    Original file (2000035534.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board carefully reviewed the applicant’s record during the period of service under review. The Board noted the applicant’s contentions that he had 8 years of honorable and faithful service and only used marijuana during a period of stress. ( X ) Change characterization of service to General, Under Honorable Conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR20040005588

    Original file (AR20040005588.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 1 April 2005 The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004101175

    Original file (AR2004101175.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. On 23 May 1994, the applicant was discharged. Remarks: Change SPD code to “FND.” SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant INDEX RECORD: AR...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004104193

    Original file (AR2004104193.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 19 September 1990, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the Army Ad Hoc Review Board’s recommendation, accepted the applicant’s resignation, and directed that he be separated with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2004 | AR2004106758

    Original file (AR2004106758.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Change characterization to Honorable. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant INDEX...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2002 | 2002076660

    Original file (2002076660.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 May 1995, the applicant was discharged. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001055943

    Original file (2001055943.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board carefully reviewed the applicant’s record during the period of service under review. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. AR Number: 2001055943 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 010815 A9235 Character of Service: GD A0100 Date of Discharge: 990115 Authority: AR 600-8-24, C3 Reason: A8000 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A Name Reason Characterization...