Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700585
Original file (199700585.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
                                    CASE NO: AD97-00585

PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1. Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD

2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 930510

3. Authority for separation:

         a. Regulation: Chapter 13, AR 635-200

         b. Reason:       Unsatisfactory Performance
4. Prior review(s): ( X ) NONE
PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

 1.       Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:

a. Period entered for: 4 Years (12 Wks) Type
b. Entry date: 910130 (910205) NDSM
c. Age: 23 Years DOB: 680908 ASR
d. Educational level: HS Grad OSR
e. Aptitude area scores: ( X ) NIF/NA
          GT: 108 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Actual creditable service: 2 Years
3 Months 11 Days Grade
E4

4. Performance evaluations:
( X ) NONE

                                             CASE NO: AD97-00585

PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued
5. Periods of unauthorized absence: ( X ) NONE


6. Nonjudicial punishment:

         Nature Date
         Art 15 920916
7. Court-Martial data: ( X ) NONE
         

8.       Remarks: ( X ) NONE
SECTION B - Other Service Data

 1. Other discharge(s):


 Service Type

 ARNG NA
         HonRel            HonRel
         ARNG              HD


         CASE NO: AD97-00585

PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A - Analyst's Assessment

1. Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge:

920420: Unit Commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation
action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, for
unsatisfactory performance. He was advised of his rights.
Undated: Separation authority waived rehabilitation and approved separation
with a general discharge.
930510: Applicant was discharged.
         

2. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity on DD Form 293 or incorporated by reference:
         ( X ) NONE

 3. Exhibit(s) submitted:

         A-1: DD Form 293, dated 961228.



PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION B - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
( X ) NONE
PART V - SUMMARY OF REVIEW HEARING


         a. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No

        
         b. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        

2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: ( X ) NONE

                                    CASE NO: AD97-00585

PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
          ( X )   Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A, Paragraph 2.
         ( )     Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
         ( )     Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:
        

b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason


2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:

          a. Propriety:    The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.
        
         b. Equity:       The applicant has not submitted an issue of equity and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of equity to change the discharge. The major factors upon which the discharge was based are set forth in Parts III and IV of this decisional document.
        


3. Response to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): ( X ) NA

                            CASE NO: AD97-00585

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.       Board conclusion(s):

         The discharge was:

          ( X )    Proper.
         ( )      Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to                                      .
         ( )      Improper as to reason. Change reason to                         under                       .
         ( X )    Equitable.
         ( )      Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to                                .
         ( )      Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to                        
                  under                       .
         ( )      Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                      under                          .

2. Voting record: Change No Change
         Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5

         The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.

Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: CPCD
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508



3. Minority views: ( X ) NA

                                     CASE NO: AD97-00585

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified       


                                 
MAJ WYRICK
Post Hearing Reviewer   


PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
(X) NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION


Approval Authority:

EL CARTIO BARNES
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board

Official:




SHERRY HILL SARGENT
Major, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge          C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AD9700585 970328 GD 930510 AR635-200 C13 A4900 NC 5-0 A
1 10 11 12 18 20 26 41 46 49 52

A9200 A0100 A9500
53 58 63

                           CASE NO: AD97-00585

PART IX - VOTING RECORD

 Name  Reason Characterization
 CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR

1. MAJ WYRICK, JIMMY Mbr      X           X    

2. LTC PHILLIPS, JOHN Mbr      X          X    

3. LTC SMITH, LILLIAN Mbr      X          X    

4. LTC WHISKER, JILL Mbr      X          X    

5. COL MELCHIOR, ROBERT PO      X          X    








Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701384

    Original file (199701384.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NO: AD97-01384 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge: Note: Applicant’s mental status evaluation and physical examination not in file.930503: Unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, for pattern of misconduct. CASE NO: AD97-01384 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700765

    Original file (199700765.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to under .2. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant CASE NO: AD97-00765 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700531

    Original file (199700531.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant CASE NO: AD97-00531 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700274

    Original file (199700274.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board was satisfied that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. CASE NO: AD97-00274 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified LTC WHISKER Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: Commander, ARPERCEN The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700367

    Original file (199700367.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): HD 2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: ( X ) NONE CASE NO: AD97-00367 PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS 1. a. Applicant’s issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A, Paragraph 2. The Army Discharge Review Board cannot change or add awards to the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700343

    Original file (199700343.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity: The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AD9700343 970402 HD 891219 AR 635-200 C14 A6770 NC 5-0 A 1 10 11 12 18 20 26 41 46 49 52

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701535

    Original file (199701535.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board examined the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700721

    Original file (199700721.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    940405: Applicant was discharged.2. Finally, the Board considered the applicant's entire record of service for the period under review; it also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally Under Other Than Honorable Conditions and that the applicant was aware of this prior to requesting discharge. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700754

    Original file (199700754.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    851112: Applicant was discharged. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A, Paragraph 2. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified COL MATHEWS Post Hearing Reviewer

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701622

    Original file (199701622.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. 861104: Applicant was discharged.2. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.