Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199701622
Original file (199701622.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

                                    CASE NO: AD97-01622

PART II - APPLICATION DATA
(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1. Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD

2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 861104

3. Authority for separation:

         a. Regulation: Chapter 13, AR 635-200

         b. Reason:       Unsatisfactory Performance

4. Prior review(s): ( X ) NONE



PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

1.       Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:


a. Period entered for: 4 Years Type
b. Entry date: 850605 ASR
c. Age: 21 Years DOB: 631118
d. Educational level: HS Grad
e. Aptitude area scores: ( X ) NIF/NA
         GT: 117 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Actual creditable service: 1 Year
4 Months 20 Days
Grade
E3

4. Performance evaluations:
( X ) NONE


                                             CASE NO: AD97-01622

PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5. Periods of unauthorized absence: ( X ) NONE


6. Nonjudicial punishment:

         Date     Offense(s)
         860625   Without authority, failed to report to your place of duty                                   (860617)(summarized)
         860801   FTG two specifications (860711); (860714); AWOL (860715-860728)
         861014   Without authority, willfully damage by painting with red spray military property of the United States the amount of said damage being in exces of $50.00 (860924)       

7. Court-Martial data:

         a. SCM: ( X ) NONE
                 
Date Offense(s)

        
         b. SPCM: ( X ) NONE
                 
Date Offense(s)


         c. GCM:  ( X ) NONE
                 
Date Offense(s)


8.       Remarks: ( X ) NONE


SECTION B - Other Service Data

1. Other discharge(s):

Service Type
         USAR NA
         ADT HonRel
         USAR HD







         CASE NO: AD97-01622

PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION A - Analyst's Assessment

1. Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge:

         861021:  Unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation                 action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, for                         unsatisfactory performance. He was advised of his rights.
         861021:  Applicant acknowledged notification.
         861021:  Unit commander recommended separation from the service.
         861022:  Applicant consulted legal counsel, and did not submit a statement in              his own behalf.
         861023:  Separation authority waived rehabilitation and approved separation                with a general under honorable conditions discharge.
         861104:  Applicant was discharged.
        

2. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity on DD Form 293 or incorporated by reference:
         See Attached DD Form 293.

3. Exhibit(s) submitted:

         A-1: DD Form 293, dated 970410.
B-1: DD Form 293, with one enclosure as submitted by the applicant.





PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW
SECTION B - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion
( X ) NONE

PART V - SUMMARY OF REVIEW HEARING


         a. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No

        
         b. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        

2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: ( X ) NONE


                                    CASE NO: AD97-01622

PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:
         ( X )   Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A, Paragraph 2.
         ( )     Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
         ( )     Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:

        

b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason


2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:

         a. Propriety:    The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.

         b. Equity:       The parenthetical numbers below corresponds to the issue numbers on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above.

(1,2) The issue is rejected. The record does not support the applicant's contention, and no evidence to support it has been submitted by the applicant, that a personality conflict with the first sergeant and marital problems impaired the applicant’s ability to serve. The Board noted that the applicant received three Articles 15 and several negative counseling statements during the enlistment period under review. Considering all the facts of the case, the Board concluded that the command attempted to assist the applicant in performing and conducting to Army standards prior to the initiation of separation; however, the applicant failed to respond appropriately to these efforts. The Board was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulations were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.

(3,4) The issues are rejected. The Board considered all the applicant's prior service, as requested, including the record of promotions, conduct and efficiency, awards and decorations, and prior honorable discharges. Normally, prior service is not considered in determining the type and character of separation for the period under review. The Board carefully screened the applicant's records, and any evidence submitted by the applicant, for data which might affect any decision as to the equity of the type of discharge received. Taking into consideration all the facts available, the Board determined the applicant's mitigation was not so meritorious as to warrant relief.


3. Response to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): ( X ) NA


                           CASE NO: AD97-01622

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.       Board conclusion(s):

         The discharge was:

         ( X )    Proper.
         ( )      Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to
                                     .
         ( )      Improper as to reason. Change reason to
                        under                       .
         ( X )    Equitable.
         ( )      Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to
                               .
         ( )      Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to
                      
                  under
                                 .
         ( )      Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to
                     under                          .


2. Voting record: Change No Change
         Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5

         The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.

Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508



3. Minority views: ( X ) NA


                                    CASE NO: AD97-01622

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified       

                                 
LIC SMITH
Post Hearing Reviewer   


PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE

(X) NONE



SECTION B - CERTIFICATION


Approval Authority:

WILLIAM E. MATHEWS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board

Official:




JIMMY R. WYRICK
Lieutenant Colonel
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge          C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

AD9701622 971024 GD 861104 AR635-200 C13 A4900 NC 5-0 A
1 10 11 12 18 20 26 41 46 49 52

A0113 A0100 A9333 A9307 A9215
53 58 63 68 73



                           CASE NO: AD97-01622

PART IX - VOTING RECORD

Name & Rank Reason Characterization
CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR

1. LTC SMITH, LILLIAN C. Mbr
     X          X    

2. COL JACKSON, MICHAEL H. Mbr
     X          X    

3. COL MELCHIOR, ROBERT J. Mbr
     X          X    

4. COL MILLER, JOEL D. Mbr
     X          X    

5. COL ALLEN, THOMAS J. PO
     X          X    





Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700125

    Original file (199700125.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior review(s): ( X ) NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. Response to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): ( X ) NA CASE NO: AD97-00125 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified COL ALLEN Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE (X) NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION EL CARTIO BARNES Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700619

    Original file (199700619.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. CASE NO: AD97-00619 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified COL MELCHIOR Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE (X) NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION EL CARTIO BARNES Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board CASE NO: AD97-00619 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700155

    Original file (199700155.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. ( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to under .2. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified COL MATHEWS Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE (X) NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION EL CARTIO BARNES Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700267

    Original file (199700267.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    951206: Unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, for entry level performance and conduct. CASE NO: AD97-00267 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified COL ALLEN Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE (X) NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION EL CARTIO BARNES Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board CASE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700421

    Original file (199700421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Response to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): ( X ) NA CASE NO: AD97-00421 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote 1. ( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to under .2. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700697

    Original file (199700697.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD2. Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge: 940511: Unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, for unsatisfactory performance. CASE NO: AD97-00697 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700194

    Original file (199700194.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A, Paragraph 2. ( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to under .2. CASE NO: AD97-00194 PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified COL MATHEWS Post Hearing Reviewer PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700572

    Original file (199700572.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Type of discharge (or characterization of service): GD 2. CASE NO: AD97-00572 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. CASE NO: AD97-00572 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700558

    Original file (199700558.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NO: AD97-00558 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. Summary of facts and circumstances concerning discharge: 920325: Unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, for misconduct, pattern of misconduct. CASE NO: AD97-00558 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1997 | 199700781

    Original file (199700781.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NO: AD97-00781 PART III - SERVICE HISTORYSECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant CASE NO: AD97-00781 PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.