Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002198
Original file (20150002198.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE: 8 September 2015

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20150002198 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending 14 January 2009, to show she was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) instead of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF).

2.  The applicant states her DD Form 214 is incorrect.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214 for the period 17 January 2008 to 15 January 2009. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to 
timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 11 April 2003.  She served multiple periods of active duty with her Reserve unit and held military occupational specialty 42A (Human Resources Specialist).

3.  Orders 06-065-00042, 81st Regional Readiness Command, Birmingham, Alabama, dated 6 March 2006, show she was ordered to active duty as a member of her Reserve unit effective 6 April 2006.  The purpose is shown as "Mobilization for IRAQI FREEDOM (IRAQ)." 

4.  She was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 11 July 2007 as a sergeant (SGT)/E-5.  She had completed 1 year, 3 months, and 9 days of net active service during the period covered by the DD Form 214.  The Iraq Campaign Medal is listed among her awards.  Item 18 (Remarks) shows she served in Iraq from 14 July 2006 to 25 June 2007.

5.  Orders A-01-801222, U. S. Army Human Resources Command, Alexandria, Virginia, dated 18 January 2008, show she was ordered to active duty for operational support.  She was directed to report to Fort Bragg, North Carolina on 17 January 2008.  The purpose is shown as "CONTINGENCY OPERATION FOR ACTIVE DUTY OPERATIONAL SUPPORT (CO-ADOS) IN SUPPORT OF OEF/OWT."  

6.  She was REFRAD on 15 January 2009 as a SGT.  She had completed 
11 months and 29 days of active duty service during the period covered by the DD Form 214.  Item 18 states, in part, "PURPOSE:  CONTINGENCY OPERATION FOR ACTIVE DUTY OPERATIONAL SUPPORT (CO-ADOS) IN SUPPORT OF OEF/OWT IAW: 10 USC 12301."

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence shows the applicant was ordered to active duty in support of OEF on 18 January 2008.  She was REFRAD on 15 January 2009.  Her DD Form 214 shows the active duty was in support of OEF.

2.  There is no available evidence showing the period of active duty ending on 
15 January 2009 was in support of OIF, not OEF.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ___x ____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110010197



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20150002198



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004078

    Original file (20110004078.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that she served two tours in Afghanistan and one tour in Iraq and she was awarded the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal (GWOTEM) and the Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM) for her deployments. She completed 1 year, 3 months, and 27 days of net active service this period. Initial award of the GWOTEM was limited to service members deployed abroad in Operations Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Iraqi Freedom (OIF) in designated specific geographic areas of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024664

    Original file (20100024664.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DA PPG, in effect at the time of the applicant's mobilization, provided that RC Soldiers who voluntarily requested to serve beyond their 24-month mobilization authorized under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code could request an extension under the policy guidance for CO-ADOS. The evidence also shows she requested and was granted a voluntary extension of her mobilization in a CO-ADOS status which began on 22 July 2009 and resulted in her serving continuously in Iraq from 25 October 2008...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020131

    Original file (20090020131.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Personnel Policy Guidance, in effect at the time of the applicant's mobilization, stated that the COTTAD policy applied to Soldiers in the following categories: Category 1: Applies to Soldiers preparing for mobilization who do not have sufficient partial mobilization authority under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12302 remaining to complete required BOG period with their units, and voluntarily request a COTTAD in order to complete 12 months BOG with their units (Outside...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001645

    Original file (20140001645.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It also shows in item 13, as corrected by a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 16 April 2009, the – * Army Commendation Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Global War on Terrorism Service Medal * Iraq Campaign Medal with one bronze service star * Army Service Ribbon * Overseas Service Ribbon * Armed Forces Reserve Medal with "M" Device b. item 18 (Remarks) shows he served in Iraq from 17 September 2006 to 1 September 2007. The evidence of record shows the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011462

    Original file (20130011462.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She provides orders, dated 30 June 2003, which show she received the ARCOM for meritorious service for the period 9 February 2003 to 1 September 2003. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the GWOTSM is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have participated in Global War on Terrorism operations outside of the areas of eligibility (AOE) designated for award of the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, Afghanistan Campaign Medal, or Iraq Campaign...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002187

    Original file (20120002187.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Her DD Form 214 shows in: a. item 12f (Foreign Service), she completed 3 years, 11 months, and 10 days of foreign service, and b. item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), among other awards the: * Army Achievement Medal (5th Award) * Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal * Global War on Terrorism Service Medal * Iraq Campaign Medal with one...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000183

    Original file (20130000183.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Military Personnel (MILPER) Message Number 08-123, issued 30 April 2008, provided guidance on the criteria, applicability and standards on awarding and wear of service stars on the Afghanistan Campaign Medal and the Iraq Campaign Medal, to recognize a Soldier's participation in designated campaign phases within the areas of eligibility for the Afghanistan Campaign Medal and Iraq Campaign Medal. The area of eligibility for Soldiers who deployed abroad in Operations Enduring Freedom and Iraqi...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017800

    Original file (20080017800.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the correct date she entered active duty, the net active service she completed, and her mission support to Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). The DD Form 214 the applicant was issued at the time of her release from active duty shows the following entries: a. With respect to the applicant's entry date, the evidence of records shows that she was ordered to ADT for a period of 22...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000287

    Original file (20080000287.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that her records should be amended to show that she completed 730 days of involuntary mobilization under the provisions of section 12302 of Title 10 United States Code (10 U.S.C. The Chief, Compensation and Entitlements Division opined that based on the guidance from the Secretary of Defense in his memorandum dated 19 January 2007 and the new policy for authorizing AIP, Members of the 56th Military Police Company do not qualify for AIP. Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004007

    Original file (20130004007.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM) for his first deployment to Kuwait/Iraq during the period 16 February 2004-14 February 2005 and the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal (GWOTEM) for his second deployment to Kuwait during the period 28 October 2010-6 August 2011. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states service members who qualified for the GWOTEM by reason of service between 19 March 2003 and 28 February 2005 in...