Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008366
Original file (20140008366.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

IN THE CASE OF:

BOARD DATE: 18 December 2014

DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140008366

THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests correction of item 11 (Primary Specialty) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) as 88M (Motor Transport Operator) vice 68K (Medical Laboratory Specialist).

2. The applicant states, in effect, he was never a 68K, and while he was in the U.S. Marine Corps his MOS was 1142 (Electrical Equipment Repair Specialist).

3. The applicant provides:

  • 2 DD Forms 214

  • his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service)

  • his Honorable Discharge Certificate

  • a Certificate of Training for Motor Transport Operator Course, Phase II

  • a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2. Available records show, after an initial enlistment in the U.S. Marine Corps, he enlisted in the Oregon Army National Guard on 6 January 2009 in the rank/grade of sergeant/E-5. As part of his enlistment, he agreed to receive training in MOS 68W (Health Care Specialist).

3. He provides a DA Form 1059 that shows he completed Phase II of MOS 88M from 17 March 2009 to 31 March 2009. Item 5 (Specialty/MOS Code) of this form shows the entry "68W" and item 14 (Comments) shows the entry "Soldier has completed both phase I and II of the 88M MOS Qualification course and can be awarded the MOS 88M."

4. He was ordered to active duty on 2 May 2009 and he served in Iraq from 11 July 2009 to 13 April 2010, where he was assigned to B Company, Task Force Atlas, 41st Brigade Combat Team.

5. His records show he received 2 Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Reports (NCOER), for the respective periods 2 May 2009 through 30 November

2009 and 1 December 2009 through 1 May 2010. Part I (Administrative Data), sub-item e. (PMOS) of each of these NCOERs shows his PMOS as 88M. The duty MOS is shown as 00F (MOS Immaterial).

6. There is no indication he was trained in, awarded, or served in MOS 68K.

7. On 15 May 2010, he was honorably released from active duty due to completion of his required active service. Item 11 of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "68K2O Medical Laboratory Specialist, 1 year and 0 months."

8. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214. Chapter 2 contains guidance for preparation of the DD Form

 214. It states the primary specialty will be taken from the Enlisted Record Brief. The entry should include the titles for all MOS in which the service member served for at least 1 year, and include the number of years and months served.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's record is void of any reference to being trained, awarded, or performing duties in the MOS 68K; therefore it is clear an administrative error occurred. Although he enlisted for the MOS 68W, he provides a DA Form 1059 showing he successfully completed training for the MOS 88M. His record also contains two NCOERs showing his PMOS as 88M. Based upon the foregoing, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his PMOS as 88M.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____ ___x____ ___x____ GRANT FULL RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

  • deleting from item 11 the entry, "68K2O, Medical Laboratory Specialist- 1 YRS 0 MOS// NOTHING FOLLOWS"

  • adding to item 11 the entry, "88M2O, Motor Transport Operator, 1 year, 0 months// NOTHING FOLLOWS"

___________x___________

CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008366

    Original file (20140008366.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 11 (Primary Specialty) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) as 88M (Motor Transport Operator) vice 68K (Medical Laboratory Specialist). The applicant provides: * 2 DD Forms 214 * his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * his Honorable Discharge Certificate * a Certificate of Training for Motor Transport...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011516

    Original file (20110011516.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he served in MOS 35M while on active duty, but his DD Form 214 shows he served as an 88M. Orders 301-408, issued by the TXARNG, dated 27 October 2008, ordered the applicant to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) for a period not to exceed 400 days, effective 25 November 2008. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 year and 27 days of net active service this period.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012793

    Original file (20080012793.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his secondary military occupational specialty (MOS) 88M (Motor Transport Operator), award of the Army Commendation Medal, and award of the Good Conduct Medal. On 18 January 2001, the applicant completed Phase I of the USAR Motor Transport Operator Course (MOS 88M) and, on 1 February 2002, he completed Phase II. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he completed 1 year, 3...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018079

    Original file (20140018079.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty): * amend the primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) shown in item 11 (Primary Specialty) from 68W3O (Health Care Specialist) to 68W3OM6 (Health Care Specialist with additional skill identifier (ASI) for practical/vocational nurse) * change the years and months shown for his PMOS * remove the entry in item 14 (Military Education) showing attendance at Practical Nurse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003562

    Original file (20150003562.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This is no evidence in his record that shows he completed any military training course and/or was awarded the MOS 31B or 88M during the period of active duty service between 24 July 2006 and 4 November 2007. The DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000793

    Original file (20140000793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This form also shows he completed 1 year and 1 day of foreign service during this period of active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. The applicant provided a DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 January 2005 that shows he was awarded MOS 88M after he completed the required active service and was released from active duty training to his USAR unit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014585

    Original file (20140014585.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant contends that he served in primary MOS 37F during his service in Afghanistan and that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show that MOS. However, there is insufficient evidence in the applicant's record and he did not provide sufficient evidence to support his contention that his commander or the designated MOS proponent awarded him by permanent order MOS 37F upon completion of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009214

    Original file (20110009214.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214. The DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of service shows in Block 11 his PMOS as 88M and indicates he served as such for 2 years and 7 months. The evidence of record show that as of 5 March 2004 he had held and served in PMOS 88M for 2 years and 7 months and PMOS 63B for 5 years and 6 months.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014110

    Original file (20130014110.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her military service records to show entitlement to a $10,000.00 Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB). Records show the applicant was processed for enlistment in the ARNGUS and DEARNG on 12 August 2009 for training in MOS 88M and a DD Form 4 was completed on that date. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and Army National Guard records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing she was granted an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001331

    Original file (20140001331.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    (1) The Request for ETP was denied for the following discrepancies: * the applicant was not DMOSQ for the contracted incentive * incentive addendum contains a missing signature from the enlisting official * the applicant was paid on unauthorized loans (2) It also shows the applicant was not DMOSQ for MOS 88M upon enlistment and that he completed training for MOS 88M on 6 September 2008. Records show the applicant enlisted in the MNARNG on 8 April 2006 for a period of 6 years and his...