Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000793
Original file (20140000793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:  	  

		BOARD DATE:  30 September 2014	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140000793 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request for correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he served in Iraq in military occupational specialty (MOS) 88M (Truck Driver).

2.  The applicant defers his statement to the documentation provided with his application.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 January 2005
* Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim)
* a document that lists previous periods of activity

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20130004700, on 22 October 2013.

2.  He has submitted new evidence that this Board will now consider.  

3.  He provided a DD Form 214 that shows he entered active duty on 24 August 2004 and completed 6 weeks of formal instruction in MOS 88M (Motor Transport Operator) in 2005.  He was honorably released from active duty training on       14 January 2005 and transferred to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 336th Transportation Group, Fort Sheridan, IL, as a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Soldier.  Item 11 (Primary Specialty) of his DD Form 214 for this period shows he was awarded MOS 88M for successfully completing the required training. 

4.  He entered active duty on 16 November 2005.

5.  His record contains a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) which shows he attended and successfully completed the 14S (Avenger Crewmember) course from 21 November 2005 through 14 February 2006.   

6.  A review of his record in the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) Integrated Web Services (IWS) portal contains a portion of his USAR record that was transferred to the Active Army on 3 March 2006.  The skills data section shows his PMOS as 88M1O and the mobilization campaign data section does not contain any information.  IWS does not contain an Active Army record for the applicant. 

7.  His record contains an Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), dated 27 August 2007.  The Overseas/Deployment Combat Duty section does not show any deployments.  His primary MOS (PMOS) is shown as 14S and the secondary MOS (SMOS) field is blank.  The assignment information section shows he served in Korea and then Fort Hood, TX, in MOS 14S.

8.  His record does not contain any orders awarding him a SMOS.

9.  On 2 October 2007, he was honorably discharged from service for parenthood after completing 1 year, 10 months, and 17 days of active service, 4 months and 21 days of prior active service, and 11 months and 25 days of prior inactive service.  Item 11 of his DD Form 214 for this period shows he held MOS 14S for a period of 1 year and 8 months.  This form also shows he completed 1 year and 1 day of foreign service during this period of active duty. 

10.  He provided a document that shows previous periods of activity and shows various periods and positions:

* from 30 July 2004 to 1 December 2004 - basic trainee
* from 24 August 2004 to 5 October 2005 - no position listed
* from 2 December 2004 to present - 88M

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states:

      a.  enter the titles of all MOSs served in for at least 1 year in item 11 and to include the number of years and months served in for each MOS.

	b.  the total amount of foreign service completed during the period of active service covered by the DD Form 214 will be entered as "YYYY MM DD" in item 12f (Foreign Service) of the form; and

	c.  for item 18 (Remarks) for an active duty Soldier deployed with his or her unit during their continuous period of active service, the statement "SERVICE IN (name of country deployed) FROM (inclusive dates for example, YYYYMMDD-YYYYMMDD)" will be entered.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant provided a DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 January 2005 that shows he was awarded MOS 88M after he completed the required active service and was released from active duty training to his USAR unit. 

2.  On 16 November 2005, he entered active duty for the purpose of completing training in MOS 14S.  He successfully completed that training on 14 February 2006 and went on to serve an additional 1 year and 8 months on active duty in Korea and Fort Hood, TX.  He was discharged on 2 October 2007 due to parenthood.  The evidence shows his MOS was reclassified after he served      10 months and 7 days in MOS 88M.  

3.  His record does not contain and he has not provided any documentation, such as an order that shows he was awarded 88M as a secondary MOS.  Furthermore, his record is void of and he has not provided sufficient evidence to show he served in Iraq at any time during his period of active duty service.  As such, he is not entitled to correction of his DD Form 214, for the period ending 
2 October 2007, to add this MOS or show he served in Iraq.  






BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20130004700, dated 22 October 2013.



      _______ _  X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000793





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140000793



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011516

    Original file (20110011516.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he served in MOS 35M while on active duty, but his DD Form 214 shows he served as an 88M. Orders 301-408, issued by the TXARNG, dated 27 October 2008, ordered the applicant to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) for a period not to exceed 400 days, effective 25 November 2008. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 year and 27 days of net active service this period.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009214

    Original file (20110009214.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214. The DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of service shows in Block 11 his PMOS as 88M and indicates he served as such for 2 years and 7 months. The evidence of record show that as of 5 March 2004 he had held and served in PMOS 88M for 2 years and 7 months and PMOS 63B for 5 years and 6 months.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003562

    Original file (20150003562.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This is no evidence in his record that shows he completed any military training course and/or was awarded the MOS 31B or 88M during the period of active duty service between 24 July 2006 and 4 November 2007. The DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011797

    Original file (20080011797.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 22 February 2000. Although there are regulatory provisions for separating a Soldier who entered into an erroneous enlistment contract or unfulfilled enlistment commitment, in view of the facts of this case and based on the recommendation of the Chief, Personnel Division, ARNG, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to correct his record by showing he held MOS 88M at the time...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020084

    Original file (20130020084.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 27 May 2013 to show in: * block 11 (Primary Specialty) – his military occupational specialty (MOS) code as 91B4O (Light Wheel Vehicle Mechanic) instead of 91B3O, and 25U4O (Signal Support Systems Specialist) 22 years 6 months instead of 25U3O 35 years 7 months * block 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) – the entry "2004 06 01" * block 18 (Remarks) – the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003665

    Original file (20090003665.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ALARACT provided that in order to receive FLPP a Reserve Component Soldier must be certified proficient within the last 12 months in a foreign language for which the Department of the Army has a critical need and assigned to military duties requiring proficiency in the requisite language and performing the duties of the position. This regulation also requires certification by the Army within the past 12 months as proficient in a designated foreign language (in this case Hungarian). ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017672

    Original file (20090017672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the Army did not correct its records to show his PMOS was 11B4P. While the applicant received awards for his Infantry service in the Republic of Vietnam to include the CIB, the orders were issued awarding these individual decorations showing the applicant's MOS as 11B at the time of the award. The evidence of record does not support correcting the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his PMOS was 11B4P at the time of separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014693C070206

    Original file (20050014693C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Jeanette R. McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of Item 10 (SGLI Coverage) and Item 11 (Primary Specialty) of her 17 January 2005 separation document (DD Form 214). The evidence of record also confirms that although the applicant served in a 42A personnel administration position, she was never trained in, or awarded the MOS as a PMOS, SMOS, or AMOS, as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105185C070208

    Original file (2004105185C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the evidence of record confirms no service in MOS 95B and that the applicant’s service as a drill sergeant is fully documented. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show any error or injustice related to the documentation of his drill sergeant service in the record. The evidence of record provides no indication that the applicant ever served in MOS 95B during his USAR service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018476

    Original file (20080018476.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DA Form 20 shows he served in the RVN from 4 August 1970 through 15 March 1972. The applicant's record contains no orders awarding him either the BSM or the PH, and neither of these awards is included in the list of earned awards contained in Item 41 of his DA Form 20 or Item 24 of his DD Form 214.