BOARD DATE: 20 November 2014
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140006781
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be amended.
2. The applicant states her military education is incorrectly shown in block 14 (Military Education) as Radar Repairer School.
3. The applicant provides:
* DD Form 214
* first page of a DA Form 3286 (Statement of Enlistment United States Army Enlistment Program)
* military occupational specialty (MOS) award orders
* DA Form 669 (Army Continuing Education System Record)
* marriage license
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Records show the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 August
2010. She completed combat and advanced individual training and was awarded the MOS 35M (Human Intelligence (HUMINT) Collector). The highest rank/grade she attained while on active duty was private first class/E-3. She was honorably released from active duty on 29 December 2013.
2. Item 14 of her DD Form 214 lists the applicant's military education as 35M - Radar Repairer School Course, 24 weeks, 2011.
3. The Army Training Requirements and Resources System (ATRRS) website lists all Army training courses available and provides scheduling. It shows the 35M1O HUMINT Collector course as a resident program, duration of
18 weeks and 3 days.
4. Department of the Army Pamphlet 600-25 (U.S. Army Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Guide) provides a list of all Army MOS. It confirms the MOS title for 35M is HUMINT Collector. It also shows Radar Repairer is MOS 94M.
5. Army Regulation 635-8 (Separation Processing and Documents) provides guidance for the completion of the DD Form 214. Regarding what information to place in block 14, it requires all formal, in-service (full time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the period of service covered.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The records clearly show the applicant's MOS was 35M, HUMINT Collector, not Radar Repairer (MOS 94M).
2. The ATRRS system shows the entry-level 35M1O course as 18 weeks and
3 days in duration.
3. The applicant's DD Form 214 should be amended to show the correct military education she completed as well as the actual course length.
BOARD VOTE:
__X______ __X______ __X__ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending her DD Form 214 to show the applicant's military education as 35M - Human Intelligence (HUMINT) Collector Course, 18 weeks and 3 days, 2011.
_______ _ X_______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140006781
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140006781
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008113
There is no evidence in his records to show that he ever served as a HUMINT Collector. While the applicant served 1 year in a TPU after his REFRAD, he is not entitled to have that service included on his DD Form 214 as it was not active duty service and it occurred after the DD Form 214 was issued. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting the entry 94M2O RADAR REPAIRER 1 YRS 10 MOS//35M1O HUMINT...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015340
The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show she served on active duty in an other than active duty for training (ADT) status. Her DD Form 214 shows she completed MOS training in 2008 and she held MOS 35M for 6 months, which shows she served in an active duty status for 6 months after completion of training. Further, her DD Form 214 clearly shows she was discharged for pregnancy or childbirth after completing 1 year, 6...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020129
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 June 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090020129 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The document states: * Question: Are Reserve or Active Component Soldiers on active duty primarily for training authorized to be awarded the GWOTSM? Her statement is correct, in part; however, she was ordered to IADT for basic and advanced individual training, not ordered to active duty or mobilized in support of Global War on Terrorism operations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011516
The applicant states he served in MOS 35M while on active duty, but his DD Form 214 shows he served as an 88M. Orders 301-408, issued by the TXARNG, dated 27 October 2008, ordered the applicant to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) for a period not to exceed 400 days, effective 25 November 2008. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 year and 27 days of net active service this period.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001348
His commander initiated an informal investigation to determine if his reenlistment was fraudulent; c. the applicant did not deliberately conceal any disqualifying factor in his reenlistment. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The IO determined that the applicant's reenlistment was neither fraudulent nor defective; rather, an erroneous reenlistment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001071
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: * two certificates for completion of Army courses * orders awarding her military occupational specialty (MOS) 71L (Administrative Specialist) * orders awarding her the additional skill identifier (ASI) F5 (Postal Operations) * deployment orders from 1 March 2000 to 20 September 2000 * NATO Medal Certificate * an undated Certificate of Achievement CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016823
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: a. award of the Bronze Star Medal, b. award of the Army Commendation Medal, and c. completion of the Arabic Language Course. The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, a Defense Language Institute diploma, a DA Form 4980-5-WT (Bronze Star Medal Certificate), and a DA Form 4980-14 (Army Commendation Medal Certificate) as documentary evidence in support of this...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001943
Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). The applicant provides: a. Although the applicant holds language-dependent MOS 35, and he provided evidence that he recertified for language proficiency for CM on 23 May 2012, there is no evidence that shows he was assigned to a duty position coded for the CM language during the period for which he requested the FLPB.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001944
The applicant requests entitlement to the foreign language proficiency bonus (FLPB) for 2012 and 2013. In accordance with Army Regulation 11-6, Reserve Soldiers who possess a language-dependent MOS will receive FLBP at the payment list "A" rate for their primary language (PLANG) which is used to describe the language coded billet in which a USAR Soldier is assigned. In addition, although CM may have been authorized for payment of FLPB in 2012, there is no evidence and the applicant has not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009628
Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. In the applicant and counsels request to grant the applicant pro rata of recoupment of any SRB already paid by installments based upon the percentage of service completed, counsel provides many in-depth trains of logic which address whether the applicant obtained his SRB through fraud, whether the applicants discharge from his erroneous reenlistment contract constituted...