Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005098
Original file (20140005098.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 
		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 October 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140005098 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the Purple Heart (PH) be removed from his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).  

2.  He states his military records at the National Personnel Records Center contain no orders awarding him the PH.

3.  He provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  On 22 January 1964, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States.  After completing initial entry training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 310 (Field Communications Crewman – converted to MOS 31A).

3.  He arrived in Vietnam on 10 October 1965, and he departed on 20 January 1966.

4.  His DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows in:

* Section 8 (Wounds Received Through Enemy Action) – no entries indicating he was wounded in action
* Section 9 (Medals, Decorations, and Citations) – an entry for the PH with the authority listed as Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Decorations and Awards)

5.  On 21 January 1966, he was honorably released from active duty after completing 2 years of active duty service.  The PH is among the awards listed in item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) on his DD Form 214.

6.  His Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain orders awarding him the PH.

7.  His service medical records are not available for review.

8.  His name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty listing compiled by The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division.

9.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Awards and Decorations Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the PH pertaining to the applicant.

10.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, provided instructions for the preparation of DD Form 214.  It stated for item 26 to enter decorations awarded or authorized during the period covered by the DD Form 214 from Section 9 of the DA Form 24, omitting authorities cited therein.



11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the PH is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  Award of the PH is announced in orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request to remove the PH from his DD Form 214.  The regulation governing the preparation of the DD Form 214 required entry of decorations awarded or authorized from Section 9 of the DA Form 24, and the PH was entered on his DD Form 214 in accordance with that regulation.

2.  The absence of PH orders is noted; however, this absence alone is an insufficient reason for removing the PH from his DD Form 214.  It is relatively common for a Vietnam-era award to appear on a DD Form 214 while the orders that authorized the award are not filed in the OMPF.  In such cases, it is normally presumed that orders provided the basis for entering the award in the Soldier's record, even if the orders were not properly filed.

3.  In light of the available evidence, it would be premature to remove the PH from the applicant's DD Form 214 without a statement from him confirming that he was not wounded as a result of hostile action during his service in Vietnam.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x___  ___x  ____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON


 I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings
of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005098



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140005098



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005588

    Original file (20120005588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It is also void of any documents showing he was wounded in action in the RVN or that he was treated for a combat-related wound by medical personnel while serving in the RVN. It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that it required treatment by military medical personnel; and a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013799

    Original file (20140013799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect: * he was ordered to stay in country [Vietnam] until his replacement came, which was longer than what it states on his DD Form 214; * the dates he attended service school for SDB MAN CEN OFF RPMN at Fort Gordon, GA are incorrect * he is entitled to a PH due to a head injury he received in Vietnam 3. A review of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) shows he requested a PH from The Assistant Adjutant General's Office. The applicant’s military personnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008203

    Original file (20080008203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). If the applicant’s shoulder wound had been received as a result of enemy action, given his hospitalization was a matter of record, and his wound was recorded on his separation medical examination, it is likely his DA Form 20 would have properly documented this fact in item 40. Absent any evidence of record that confirms the applicant was wounded in action or treated for a combat-related wound or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021157

    Original file (20100021157.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) includes a Western Union Telefax and a U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) message number date time group (DTG) 140312Z MAY 69, stating: * he was slightly wounded by fragments while at an artillery firing position when the area came under attack by a hostile force * he received multiple wounds to both ankles and his left arm * he was treated and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017749

    Original file (20130017749.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the PH is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Although the eyewitness statement indicates the applicant was hit in the back by a large piece of shrapnel, his service record is void of medical documents which indicate he was wounded as a result of hostile action or treated for those wounds. In the absence of evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is an insufficient basis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017390

    Original file (20130017390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart (PH) for a shrapnel wound he received in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) in 1969. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the PH is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018924

    Original file (20100018924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, to be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) and correction of his 1975 DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to add this award. He states he served in the Republic of Vietnam from February 1967 to February 1968 and should be awarded the PH based on medical evidence.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007779

    Original file (20120007779.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination) and a Standard Form 89 (Report of Medical History) completed at the time of his release from active duty do not show he was wounded as a result of enemy action. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the PH is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Although the RVN Gallantry Cross orders indicate he was wounded, his service record is void of evidence that he was wounded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020301

    Original file (20140020301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for award of the PH. Absent evidence that conclusively shows the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or injuries, and that this treatment was made a matter of official record, there is an insufficient basis for awarding him the PH in this case. ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ABCMR Record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022089

    Original file (20110022089.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN during the period 23 January 1971 through 5 November 1971. It states the PH is awarded to members wounded in action. Notwithstanding the unit members’ statements, in order to support award of the PH the member must have been wounded in action and there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action.