Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017749
Original file (20130017749.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  12 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130017749 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart (PH).

2.  He states he was wounded in Vietnam and he was airlifted.

3.  He provides his DA Form 2658 (Health Record - Abstract of Service), two eyewitness statements, his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), and Daily Staff Journal or Duty Officer's Logs.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 18 March 1969 and was honorably discharged on 13 March 1970 for enlistment in the Regular Army (RA).  
3.  He enlisted in the RA on 14 March 1970 and he served in Vietnam from 16 August 1969 to 15 August 1970.

4.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not list any entries in item 40 (Wounds) or an entry for award of the PH in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).

5.  His service record does not contain orders that show he was awarded the PH and the Vietnam Casualty Roster does not list his name.  

6.  He was honorably released from active duty on 13 March 1973.  His DD Form 214 issued for this period does not show award of the PH.  

7.  He provided eyewitness statements from two former fellow Soldiers who attested they served with him in Vietnam during 1969 to 1970.  One of the former fellow Soldiers stated the applicant was hit in the back by a large piece of shrapnel.  He remembers seeing the shrapnel protruding from the applicant's back, he pulled it out, and burned his fingers in the process.  

8.  He also provided Daily Staff Journal or Duty Officer's Logs and operations summaries for Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division which reported incidents that occurred in February 1970.  The journals reported statistical losses of Soldiers who were wounded in action or killed in action.

9.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the PH pertaining to the applicant.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the PH is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he was wounded in Vietnam.  However, his service record is void of evidence and he has not provided sufficient evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action or treated for those wounds.  

2.  By regulation, in order to be awarded the PH, it is necessary to establish that a Soldier was wounded in action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and the treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

3.  Although the eyewitness statement indicates the applicant was hit in the back by a large piece of shrapnel, his service record is void of medical documents which indicate he was wounded as a result of hostile action or treated for those wounds.  His name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster and his DA Form 20 does not show he was wounded in action.

4.  In the absence of evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is an insufficient basis upon which to base award of the PH in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130017749





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130017749



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022039

    Original file (20130022039.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in his military records that indicates he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was treated for a combat-related wound. General Order Number 296 issued by Headquarters, 93rd Evacuation Hospital, dated 8 November 1969, awarded members of A Troop, 1st Squadron, 11th ACR the Purple Heart for wounds received on 7 November 1969; however, his name is not listed on the Purple Heart orders. The eyewitness statements were carefully considered; however, in the absence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075371C070403

    Original file (2002075371C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records to show he was wounded in action. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant met the eligibility criteria for award of the Purple Heart. A review of the historical files of the unit's Daily Staff Journal for the two dates mentioned by the applicant failed to show the unit came under artillery or mortar attack on those dates.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006834

    Original file (20120006834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, he received a copy of his military record and noted the following wounds were not annotated: * 16 February 1944, Anzio, Italy, head wound * 2 April 1944, Anzio, Italy, back wound * 8 April 1944, Anzio, Italy, finger wound * 28 December 1944, Colmar, France, hand wound * 9 January 1945, Orbey, France, leg wounds * 4 April 1945, Eichenbach, Germany, chest wound 3. The applicant provides: * Letter, dated 12 October 2010 * Excerpt from a newspaper, dated May 2011 * Self-authored...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016275

    Original file (20140016275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of the following: * two Standard Forms (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination) * two SFs 89 (Report of Medical History) * medical history * International Certificates of Vaccination * five SFs 600 (Health Record – Chronological Record of Medical Care) * SF 539 (Clinical Record – Abbreviated Clinical Record) * dental record * letter of commendation * SF 602 (Health Record – Dental Clinic) * DA Form 3082-R (Statement of Medical Condition) * DD Form 214 (Armed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007166

    Original file (20120007166.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. There is no evidence in the available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was injured and treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statement and military photograph provided by the applicant are not sufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000309C070205

    Original file (20060000309C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 August 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060000309 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the award of the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072643C070403

    Original file (2002072643C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board also noted that the applicant authenticated his discharge document which shows that he was not awarded the Purple Heart. Based on the foregoing, there is no basis for granting award of the Purple Heart in this case. The applicant’s DD Form 214, with a separation date of 14 June 1983, shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004811

    Original file (20140004811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provided the following documents: a. a personal letter, dated May 1986, in which he stated he was "put in" for a Purple Heart and he stated a piece of metal shrapnel hit him in the back. Unfortunately, his memory does not recall particular dates and details; however, he did, for a number days, clean and dress an infected wound to the applicant's lower back while they served in M Platoon, Company A performing combat duties. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008220

    Original file (20120008220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. The Purple Heart requires: * the wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records 3. There is no evidence in the available record that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007228

    Original file (20100007228.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the applicant's service personnel records. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statements provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. ____________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board...