Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005588
Original file (20120005588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 September 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120005588 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart (PH).  

2.  The applicant states he believes he is deserving of the PH.  He states on 
1 March 1969, while he was in hostile territory, he was wounded in the leg.  He states he was initially treated at the combat aid station and then he was treated by medical personnel who removed the shrapnel but he cannot remember where.

3.  The applicant provides a medical treatment document in support of his request.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 11 April 1967, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army and he was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 62L (Wheel Tractor Operator).  The record shows he was promoted to specialist five (SP5)/E-5 on 
18 March 1969 and this is the highest rank/grade he attained during his military service.

3.  The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 16 April 1968 to 20 March 1969.  Item 40 (Wounds) is blank, and the PH is not included in the list of awards entered in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).  His record is void of orders or other documents indicating he was awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty.  It is also void of any documents showing he was wounded in action in the RVN or that he was treated for a combat-related wound by medical personnel while serving in the RVN.

4.  On 21 November 1969, the applicant was honorably released from active duty.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he completed 2 years, 7 months, and 11 days of active military service.  It also shows that during his active duty tenure he earned the following awards: 

* National Defense Service Medal
* Army Good Conduct Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* RVN Campaign Medal

5.  The applicant provides a medical treatment form that indicates he was treated for a laceration to the leg on 1 March 1969, which included removal of shrapnel.  The form further indicates the cause of the wound was undetermined. 

6.  A review of The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing does not show the applicant's name as a casualty.

7.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command failed to reveal an award of the PH pertaining to the applicant.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army’s awards policy.  Paragraph 2-8 contains guidance on the PH.  It states in order to support 


award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that it required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request for award of the PH has been carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support his request.  By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. 

2.  Although the applicant provides a medical treatment form indicating he was treated for a leg wound on 1 March 1969, which included removal of shrapnel, this document indicates the cause of the wound was undetermined.  His record is void of any entries or documents that indicate this wound was received as a result of enemy action.  Further, item 40 of his DA Form 20 is blank which indicates he was not wounded in action and there is no entry on the Vietnam casualty listing, the official DA list of RVN casualties, pertaining to the applicant.  Absent any evidence of record confirming the applicant was wounded as a result of enemy action, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the PH has not been satisfied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120005588



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120005588



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012536

    Original file (20120012536.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart (PH) to his deceased father, a former service member (FSM). However, there is insufficient evidence to support his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010212

    Original file (20120010212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) prepared during this enlistment on 2 March 1977 does not include the PH in the list of awards contained in item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns). It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound must have required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006673

    Original file (20080006673.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH, it is necessary to establish that the wound, for which the award is being made, was received as a direct result of, or was caused by enemy action, and that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel. Notwithstanding the VA documents provided, absent any evidence of record showing that the applicant was wounded as a result...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004005

    Original file (20120004005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that it required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence the wound for which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001818

    Original file (20120001818.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's record is void of any entries or documents corroborating his claim that he was wounded in action in the RVN or that show he was ever treated for a combat-related wound by medical personnel while serving in the RVN. The applicant's record is void of any documents or orders indicating he was ever recommended for or awarded the AM by proper authority during his active duty tenure and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002565C071029

    Original file (20070002565C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence confirming the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of or was caused by enemy action, that the wound required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Finally, while the veracity of the applicant's claim of entitlement to the PH and of the information contained in the third-party statement and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010136C071029

    Original file (20060010136C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any orders, or other documents, that indicate the applicant was ever recommended for, or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. Absent any evidence of record or independent evidence confirming the applicant was wounded as a result of enemy action or treated for a combat related wound or injury while serving in he RVN, or that he was ever awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016959C071029

    Original file (20060016959C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he served in the RVN from 9 January 1970 through 8 August 1971. Item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in action, and Item 41 does not include the PH in the list of authorized awards entered. Further, the list of authorized awards contained in Item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not include the PH, and he authenticated this document with his signature on the date of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002620

    Original file (20120002620.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he completed 2 years, 11 months, and 29 days of active military service. The applicant’s request for award of the PH has been carefully considered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004616

    Original file (20090004616.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a newspaper article as new evidence in support of his reconsideration request. His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), which he last reviewed on 3 March 2001, does not include the PH in the list of awards contained in item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns). Absent any evidence of record corroborating his claim that he was wounded in action and/or treated for a combat-related wound while serving in the RVN or that shows he was ever recommended for or...