Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018924
Original file (20100018924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100018924 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, to be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) and correction of his 1975 DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to add this award.

2.  He states he served in the Republic of Vietnam from February 1967 to February 1968 and should be awarded the PH based on medical evidence.

3.  He provided copies of:

* a DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 February 1975
* a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 October 1984
* a Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC)-Oklahoma City Consent for Treatment/Procedure, dated 4 May 2010
* medical laboratory results, printed on 1 June 2010, from the VAMC
* medical progress notes, printed on 1 June 2010, from the VAMC

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  After having had prior service, he enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 May 1963 and subsequently served on active duty through a series of reenlistments.

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record):

* item 31 (Foreign Service), shows he served in Vietnam from 14 February 1967 through 7 February 1968
* item 40 (Wounds), is blank
* item 41 (Awards and Decorations), does not show award of the PH

4.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 February 1975 shows he was honorably discharged for the purpose of reenlistment.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show award of the PH; however, it does indicate he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with "V" Device (issued by the 2d Infantry Division during a period of time he was assigned to Korea).

5.  His name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster and his medical records are not available for review.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the PH pertaining to the applicant.

7.  He submitted copies of three documents from the VAMC in Oklahoma City, OK.  These documents show he gave his consent for the VAMC to perform a procedure to remove metal fragments from the right side of his mouth on 4 May 2010.  The lab results show the single metal fragment in his mouth was compatible with shrapnel.  The fibrous tissue showed signs of reaction to iron-containing mineral deposits and severe hemosiderosis.

8.  The medical progress notes stated he wanted the old piece of shrapnel taken out of his mouth as proof of a war injury for award of the PH.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence he provided from the VAMC-Oklahoma City showed he had shrapnel removed from his mouth in May 2010.  However, absent evidence to show his wounds were a result of hostile action, he required medical treatment at the time, and that medical treatment was made a matter of record, there is insufficient evidence to award him the PH.

2.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018924



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018924



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006932

    Original file (20080006932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. The applicant's records contain no evidence upon which an award of the Purple Heart may be made. In order to award a Purple Heart, evidence must show that a wound occurred and was the result of hostile action; that the wound required medical treatment; and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058618C070421

    Original file (2001058618C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: There are no entries in this document that indicate that the applicant was entitled to the PH on the date of his separation nor does it confirm that he was ever wounded or injured during his tenure on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000842.

    Original file (20140000842..txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides photocopies of two pictures of an individual and VAMC radiology reports. There is no documentation in his military records and he did not provide any evidence that indicates he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was treated for a combat-related wound. Therefore, in the absence of such evidence, the documentation provided, which does not show he was wounded as a result of hostile actions, is insufficient evidence on which to base awarding him the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015458

    Original file (20140015458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * he was relieved from duty, on 16 February 1968, while at Firebase Bravo, Camp Enari, Pleiku, Vietnam * he was flown to Cam Rahn Bay Air Base for his flight back to the United States, on 17 February 1968 * he was flown to Fort Lewis, WA, to begin his out-processing * he was issued a new dress uniform, complete with ribbons, patches, and Blackhawk insignias already on his uniform * his original DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010741

    Original file (20110010741.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant departed Vietnam en-route to the U.S. on 27 November 1968. Although ADCARS does not contain the orders showing he was awarded the Purple Heart, the Vietnam Casualty Listing shows him as being wounded in action on 18 May 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for exemplary service from 24 January 1967 through 30 November 1968 and amending...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011760

    Original file (20060011760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his earlier request to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) that he be awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant's new argument, as stated in his request, is that he should be awarded the Purple Heart for a wound sustained in 1967, in Phu Bai, Vietnam, during a mortar attack. However, there is no evidence, and the applicant has provided none, to show that he sustained a wound in 1967, in Vietnam, during a mortar...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003778

    Original file (20090003778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The rating decision states the applicant had been treated for a wound he sustained to his left knee in February 1969. The applicant was wounded a second time in the left knee, in February 1969. While the evidence shows he received treatment by medical personnel for a wound that he sustained to his left knee, there is no evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070472C070402

    Original file (2002070472C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although there is no direct medical evidence to show that the applicant received medical treatment for the claimed wounds, the physician from his October 1991 flight physical indicated that the applicant had a history of corneal abrasion. This would not be inconsistent with Warrant Officer D___’s description of the applicant’s wounds.The Board concludes that any reasonable doubt concerning the applicant’s eligibility for award of the Purple Heart should be resolved in his favor. That all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012856

    Original file (20110012856.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The VA Rating Decision provided by the applicant is new evidence that should be considered by the Board. The original Record of Proceedings states: a. the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was wounded; b. there was an absence of evidence showing the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014459

    Original file (20140014459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was told by those in command that he was not authorized a PH because he was wounded as a result of friendly fire * he meets the regulations for the PH under friendly fire pursuant to Title 10 U.S. Code (USC), Section 1129 (Purple Heart: members killed or wounded in action by friendly fire) * when he left Vietnam, his local command informed him they had lost his medical records and he also has post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) * he also tried to find reports or...