IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 15 May 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110022089
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart (PH).
2. The applicant states while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) the vehicle that he was acting as track commander in was hit on its right side by an RPG-7 (rocket propelled grenade), causing him to sustain shrapnel wounds to both his right arm and lower right leg. Due to the unit being understrength, he did not feel his wounds were serious enough for him to be evacuated; therefore, the temporary medic treated his wounds and stated he would complete the required paperwork once they returned. He further states he has applied to the awards branch at the Army Human Resources Command (AHRC) twice and was denied both times due to lack of official documentation. He has also contacted the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) requesting his records; however, they could not be located.
3. The applicant provides:
* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record)
* Two denials from AHRC for award of the PH
* Three DA Forms 2823 (Sworn Statement)
* One typed sworn statement
* Copy of 3/5 Cavalrys S-3 daily report
* Memoranda, correspondence and emails with AHRC, and a letter from NPRC
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 September 1969. He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 11D (Armor Reconnaissance Specialist).
3. The applicants DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN during the period 23 January 1971 through 5 November 1971. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows during his RVN tour he was assigned to C Troop, 1/6th Armored Cavalry, performing duties in MOS 11D as an armor reconnaissance specialist. Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicants DA Form 20 contains no entries.
4. The applicants DD Form 214 shows he earned the following awards:
* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Combat Infantryman Badge
* RVN Campaign Medal w/60 device
* One Overseas Service Bar
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16)
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Badge with Hand Grenade Bar
* Bronze Star Medal
5. He submitted three DA Forms 2823 and a written statement as follows:
a. A sworn statement, dated 24 June 2011, from a member of 1st Platoon, C Troop, 3/5 Cavalry who was the driver of the 12 track for which the applicant was the track commander which states he attests to the fact that the applicant was
wounded in both his right arm and lower right leg during combat actions during Operation Lom Son 719. He further states he saw the acting platoon medic remove pieces of shrapnel from the back of the applicants lower right leg and that the right arm at the elbow had already been bandaged.
b. A sworn statement, dated 24 June 2011, from the track commander of the 16 Track, the platoon leaders vehicle, which states he, too, personally witnessed the acting platoon medic remove pieces of shrapnel from the back of the applicants right leg.
c. A sworn statement, dated 24 June 2011, from the Platoon Sergeant of the 1st Platoon, C Troop, 3/5 Cavalry which states they were ambushed while conducting a road security mission and at least four of the platoon vehicles were hit and they sustained a number of casualties. He further states that he did not personally witness the applicant receive his wounds but can attest to the fact that the applicant had shrapnel removed from his right arm and lower right leg.
d. A written statement, dated 15 June 2009, from another member of the 1st Platoon, C Troop, 3/5 Cavalry states he, too, personally witnessed the platoon medic remove pieces of shrapnel from the back of the applicants right leg.
6. He also provided copies of the 3/5 Cavalry S-3 daily report confirming that the unit did in fact receive RPG rounds and small arms fire. However, it does not list him as being wounded.
7. The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster.
8. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch, AHRC, also failed to reveal any orders for the PH pertaining to the applicant.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the Army's awards policy. Paragraph 2-8 contains guidance on the PH. It states the PH is awarded to members wounded in action. It also states in order to award the PH there must be evidence of the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicants request for award of the PH was carefully considered and determined to lack sufficient evidence to grant relief.
2. Notwithstanding the unit members statements, in order to support award of the PH the member must have been wounded in action and there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action. The member must have required medical treatment by military medical personnel and this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
3. Item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 does not indicate he was wounded in action. Further, there is no entry pertaining to the applicant on the Vietnam casualty listing, the official list of RVN casualties.
4. The applicant's service in the RVN is not in question. Additionally, the sincerity of the applicant is also not in question. However, there is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and/or treated for such wounds. The regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart has not been met; therefore, it would not be appropriate to award the applicant the Purple Heart.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ___X_____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
____________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110022089
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110022089
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001320
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides 4 third-party statements from individuals who served with him in the RVN. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show his entitlement to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and 1 silver service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019952
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides a letter of support from an individual who states he was also wounded in Vietnam in May 1972. It states that in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that the wound required treatment by a medical officer, and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022864
A self-authored statement, dated 21 October 2009, wherein he states he served as the platoon sergeant of the 1st Platoon, C Troop. d. An undated statement from another former member (tank gunner) of the applicant's platoon wherein he states on or around 20 August 1968, they were returning from a mine sweep mission to QTC when their tank hit a bomb that damaged the right front of the tank. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity and the sincerity of his former platoon members, in the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001047
The Board determined the unit member's and/or witness statements alone, absent any conclusive evidence to show he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, that he was treated for such wounds by medical personnel, and that his treatment was made a matter official record, were insufficient evidentiary bases to award him the PH and denied his request. Therefore, he should be awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 2 April 1971 and his DD Form 214 for the period...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000309C070205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 August 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060000309 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the award of the Army Good Conduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019777
He states: * He served in Vietnam from November 1969 to October 1970 * He performed perimeter security detail by setting up night ambushes * On the night of 11 February 1970 he sustained shrapnel injuries to his left leg from mortar rounds * He was treated by medical personnel and released to his unit * He did not receive the PH for this injury * On 29 April 1970, he was the driver of an Armored Personnel Carrier (APC) that was following a tank and he veered 10 feet out of the tracks of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012340
The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart (PH) as a result of injuries he received in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) between 12 and 13 July 1970. The available evidence does not support correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was wounded in the leg or awarding him the PH. _______ _ _x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002135C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 March 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040002135 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on award of the Vietnam Service Medal and it states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011044
Paragraph 2-8 contains guidance on award of the PH and states, in pertinent part, that in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that it required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. However, by regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011011C071029
It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member who has been wounded or killed in action. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action. The applicant's DA Form 20 contains no entry in Item 40, which indicates the applicant was never wounded in action while serving on active duty, and the PH is not included in the list of authorized awards contained in Item 41.