Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019012
Original file (20130019012 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 June 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130019012 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army   Good Conduct Medal. 

2.  The applicant states:

* he did not receive the Army Good Conduct Medal because he received an Article15 while assigned to Vint Hills Farms, VA 
* the Article 15 was based on false evidence, an act of discrimination, retaliation, and harassment by his supervising and commanding officers
* his service to his country was exemplary as demonstrated by the numerous awards he received

3.  The applicant provides a three-page self-authored statement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 October 1969.

3.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows his conduct and efficiency were rated as "Good" while assigned to Fort Carson, CO.

4.  His record contains his disciplinary history which shows the acceptance of nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for one instance of being disrespectful toward a commissioned officer on 21 July 1972.

5.  On 10 October 1972, he was released from active after serving honorably for 3 years and 1 day of total active service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with "1960" Device, Army Commendation Medal, one Overseas Service Bar, and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16).

6.  His record is void of any evidence and he has not provided any evidence that shows he was discriminated against during his assignment at Vint Hill Farms, VA or during any other period of assignment.

7.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active enlisted service.  This period was 3 years except in those cases when the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence of record nor did the applicant submit any evidence that shows he was discriminated against while assigned to Vint Hills Farm, VA or during any other period of assignment.

2.  The available evidence shows the applicant’s conduct and efficiency were rated as "Good" during one period of assignment (while at Fort Carson).  An enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings for 

award of the Good Conduct Medal.  Therefore, he is not entitled to have his 
DD Form 214 corrected to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 	

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019012



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130019012



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003092

    Original file (20130003092.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and her last duty assignment and major command as the U.S. Army Electronics Materiel Readiness Activity, U.S. Army Europe (USAREUR), in Germany. She completed 2 years, 1 month, and 3 days of active service with 1 year, 5 months, and 18 days of foreign service. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AFEM is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009202

    Original file (20110009202.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine Bar (M-1), to correct his weight shown on this form, and to show he attended the Intercept Equipment Repairman course at Fort Meade, MD, from November...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008253

    Original file (20140008253.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 issued at that time shows in: * item 12f (Foreign Service) – 1 year of foreign service * item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) – * Good Conduct Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Army Service Ribbon * Overseas Service Ribbon * item 18 (Remarks) – no entries referencing deployed service 5. Approved designated campaigns are: * Defense of Saudi Arabia (2 August 1990 to 16 January 1991) * Liberation and Defense of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075089C070403

    Original file (2002075089C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The evidence of record shows that the PUC has not been awarded since the war in Vietnam ended.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058140C070420

    Original file (2001058140C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his Report of Transfer or Discharge, DD Form 214, be amended to show he completed Military Police training, the Teletypewriter Equipment Repair course, and Emergency Medical Care training. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 April 1964. The applicant’s DD Form 214 already lists the Military Police and Teletypewriter Repair courses.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016492

    Original file (20100016492.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and any other awards and decorations to which he is entitled. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the AGCM (First Award) to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015382

    Original file (20110015382.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected by adding his awards for his service in Vietnam. The applicant was authorized awards of the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the MUC and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; however, for reasons not explained in his official records they were omitted from his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016994

    Original file (20140016994.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he was awarded the Aircraft Crew Member Badge by his commanding officer, 330th Radio Research Company at Pleiko in 1970 * he wore the badge on his uniform for 2 years but it does not show on his DD Form 214 * he was also awarded the Presidential Unit Citation and the Meritorious Unit Citation * he was told by other unit members that his unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * he served on active duty for 3 years, 7...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026927

    Original file (20100026927.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that all of his authorized awards, to include the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AFEM is awarded for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022481

    Original file (20110022481.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 4 (Component and Branch or Class) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show he was in the Army Security Agency (ASA) as opposed to the Signal Corps. The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. He contends his branch was not Signal Corps and his DD Form 214 should show his branch as Army Security Agency.