Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016492
Original file (20100016492.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 December 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100016492 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and any other awards and decorations to which he is entitled.

2.  The applicant states he should be eligible for the VSM for his service with the 7th Radio Research Field Station (RRFS) in Thailand that ended in March 1975.

3.  The applicant provides copies of reassignment orders and his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 February 1973.  Upon completion of initial entry training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 05D (Electronic Warfare/Signals Intelligence Identifier) and served in that MOS until he was honorably relieved from active duty on 27 February 1976 after completing 3 years of active military service.

3.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar and Hand Grenade Bar.

4.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he served in Thailand from 24 March 1974 to 10 March 1975 in item 5 (Oversea Service).  Item 35 (Record of Assignments) shows he was assigned for duty in Thailand with the 7th RRFS.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the VSM is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations.  Members in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for this award.  "Direct support" is defined as services being supplied the combat forces in the area of operations by ground units, ships, and aircraft providing supplies and equipment to the forces concerned, provided it involves actually entering the designated area, and ships and aircraft providing fire, patrol, guard, reconnaissance, or other military support.

6.  General Orders Number 7, issued by Headquarters, Vint Hill Farms Station, on 14 January 1976, announced award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) (First Award) to the applicant.

7.  The version of Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) in effect at the time provided that item 26 of the DD Form 214 would list decorations and awards for an individual's entire Army service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served in Thailand after the period of eligibility for the VSM had ended.  Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his record to show this award.

2.  However, the evidence does show he received an award that is not listed on his DD Form 214.  General orders announced award of the AGCM to the applicant.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his record to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the AGCM (First Award) to his DD Form 214.

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the VSM.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100016492



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100016492



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016783

    Original file (20090016783.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the applicant requests his military records be corrected to show a combat duty assignment while assigned to Thailand and a TDY assignment in Vietnam in May 1968, the governing regulation states that there is no provision to show any assignment other than the unit of assignment upon separation on the DD Form 214. Therefore, his military records should be corrected to show the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000675

    Original file (20110000675.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * A silver and a bronze service star to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal * The Meritorious Unit Commendation instead of the Meritorious Unit Citation * His home of record (HOR) as "305 C----h Street" instead of "309 C----h Street" 2. The applicant completed two periods of foreign service in Thailand, not in Vietnam. The applicant's OMPF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017801

    Original file (20100017801.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal for his service during the Vietnam Conflict and its addition to his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), dated 14 September 1976. The evidence of records does not show the applicant met the criteria for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal for his period of service in Thailand. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015855

    Original file (20110015855.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show the Vietnam Service Medal with 7 bronze service stars and the Meritorious Unit Commendation (1st Oak Leaf Cluster). The applicant contends his record should be corrected to show the Vietnam Service Medal with service stars representing his participation in 7 campaigns and two awards of the Meritorious Unit Commendation. ____________x___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026328

    Original file (20100026328.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Members of the Armed Forces of the United States in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for this award. Based on a qualifying period of service and his assignment to a unit which provided direct support for the Vietnam War, he is entitled to award of the AFEM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the following awards...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023172

    Original file (20100023172.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) based on his service in Thailand and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add this award. Army Regulation 600-8-22 authorized the VSM and RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) to members who served in Thailand in units providing direct support to RVN operations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012192

    Original file (20120012192.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and any other awards he may be entitled to. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show the VSM, RVN Campaign...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004623

    Original file (20140004623.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the VSM is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show he earned medals for support of operations in Vietnam while serving in Thailand.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016051

    Original file (20140016051.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show three awards of the MUC, the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation based on his service with USASAFS Hakata, Japan, from April 1971 to March 1972 and his service with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006071

    Original file (20110006071.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant states the FSM served in Thailand from 27 August to 3 December 1962 and when he requested his medals and awards in 2006 he was informed that he was entitled to the VSM; however, it was never added to his record. Army Regulation 600-8-22...