IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 June 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100026927 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that all of his authorized awards, to include the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). 2. The applicant states that he served in Vietnam from January 1964 to March 1965 with the 8th Radio Research Unit (RRU). 3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in Syracuse, New York, on 7 June 1962 for a period of 3 years and assignment to the Army Security Agency. He completed basic training at Fort Dix, New Jersey, and advanced individual training as a military policeman at Fort Gordon, Georgia, before being transferred to Vint Hills Farm Station in Warrenton, Virginia, for duty as a security guard. 3. On 6 January 1964, he was transferred to Vietnam for assignment to the 8th RRU in Phu Bai, South Vietnam. He was advanced to the rank of corporal on 13 July 1964. 4. He departed Vietnam on 8 March 1965 and was transferred to Oakland Army Base, California, where he was honorably released from active duty on 8 March 1965 as an overseas returnee. He completed 2 years, 9 months, and 2 days of active service and was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), Army Good Conduct Medal, and marksmanship qualification badges. 5. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AFEM is awarded for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period. It states individuals who qualified for the AFEM for service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 and 3 July 1965 (inclusive) shall remain qualified for that medal. Upon request, the VSM may be awarded in lieu of the AFEM, but the regulation requires that the AFEM be removed from the records of the individual. No person will be entitled to both awards for Vietnam service. 6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the VSM is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations. A bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the VSM for participation in each campaign. Service members who earned the AFEM for service in Vietnam between 1 July 1958 and 3 July 1965 may elect to receive the VSM instead of the AFEM. However, no service member may be issued both medals for service in Vietnam. 7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined. 8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more. 9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of Soldiers for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. It shows that during the applicant's assignment his unit was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant was awarded the AFEM for his service in Vietnam and therefore is not entitled to an additional award of the VSM for that service. However, he may request in writing that the VSM be substituted for the AFEM which will result in removal of the AFEM from his records. 2. The evidence of record does show the applicant is entitled to awards of the NDSM, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), MUC, and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Accordingly, these awards should be added to his records at this time. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ____X____ ____X____ ___X_____ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the NDSM, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), MUC, and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to his records and DD Form 214. 2. The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to awarding him the VSM. _____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100026927 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100026927 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1