Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000809
Original file (20100000809.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  1 JULY 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100000809 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded an Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM).

2.  The applicant states that he believes he should have received an AFEM because he served in Puerto Rico and Cuba.  He goes on to state that he was en route from Puerto Rico to Cuba for the invasion but they were called off before invading.  Accordingly, his involvement should justify an award of the AFEM.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 September 1959 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his basic and advanced individual training at Fort Ord, California and was transferred to Fort Campbell, Kentucky to undergo airborne training.  

3.  He completed his airborne training and remained assigned to the 101st Airborne Division band as a musician for his entire enlistment.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 29 June 1962.

4.  On 29 August 1962, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) for the purpose of entering or returning to school.  He had served 2 years, 11 months, and 16 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Parachutist Badge and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with carbine bar.

5.  In July 1986, the applicant applied to the United States Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) in St. Louis, Missouri requesting that he be awarded the AFEM.  In November 1986, the ARPERCEN responded to his request to the effect that there was no evidence in his official records to show his entitlement to award of the AFEM or any other campaign medals.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the AFEM is authorized for participants in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period.  An individual, who was not engaged in actual combat or equally hazardous activity, must have been a bona fide member of a unit participating in, or be engaged in the direct support of, the operation for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days provided this support involved entering the area of operations.  The AFEM was awarded for service in Cuba from 24 October 1962 to 1 June 1963.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 defines “area of operation” as the foreign territory upon which troops have actually landed or are present and specifically deployed for the direct support of the designated military operation; adjacent water areas in which ships are operating, patrolling, or providing direct support of operations; and the airspace above and adjacent to the area in which operations are being conducted.  “Direct support” is defined as services being supplied to participating forces in the area of eligibility by ground units, ships, and aircraft provided it involves actually entering the designated area of eligibility.  This includes units, ships, and aircraft providing logistic, patrol, guard, reconnaissance, or other military support within the designated area of eligibility.  “Area of eligibility” is defined as the foreign territory on which troops have actually landed or are present and specifically deployed for the operation; adjacent water areas in which ships are operating, patrolling, or providing direct support of the operation; and the air space above and adjacent to the area in which operations are being conducted.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he should be awarded the AFEM for his involvement in the Cuban Missile Crisis has been noted and appears to lack merit.  While an AFEM was awarded for service in Cuba from 24 October 1962 to 1 June 1963, the applicant had already been REFRAD in August 1962 and thus could not qualify for that award.

2.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, there appears to be no basis to award him the AFEM.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X___  ___X____   DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000809



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000809

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001350

    Original file (20110001350.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 July 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110001350 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record) for the period 26 May 1961 through 24 January 1964 shows he served in Korea from 12 July 1961 through 11 September 1962 in section 5 (Service Outside the Continental United States).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017978

    Original file (20100017978.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he recently requested the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) and the AFEM and was awarded the NDSM but was denied the AFEM according to the archives technician at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC). At the time of the applicant's military service, the designated military operations and dates of eligibility for award of the AFEM were Berlin from 14 August 1961 to 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007886

    Original file (20090007886.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records do not show any evidence that he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for service in support of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for participants in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period. However, there is no evidence of record and the applicant provides insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021485

    Original file (20130021485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no substantiating evidence that the applicant served in direct support or within the area of eligibility for which the AFEM was authorized for operations in the Cuban Missile Crisis. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the NDSM to the awards already listed on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010608C080213

    Original file (20070010608C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides orders, dated 6 March 1962, assigning him to Fort Benning, GA; his DD Form 214; a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 8 April 1965; his Honorable Discharge Certificate; a letter, dated 5 July 2001, from the Review Boards Agency Support Division; two DD Forms 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record under the Provisions of Title 10, U. S. Code, Section 1552), both dated 5 April 2001; an Army Precommission Extension Course diploma; three subcourse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001345

    Original file (20150001345.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant served during a qualifying period for award of the NDSM and it should be added to his records at this time. However, the applicant has failed to show through the evidence of record and the evidence submitted with his application that he meets the criteria for award of the AFEM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 28 June 1960 through 27 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007051

    Original file (20100007051.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The MAB stated: The 84th Engineer Battalion, though deployed to support efforts against potential hostile action coming from Berlin, did not serve in the geographical area of Berlin; therefore, service members assigned to that unit are not eligible to receive award of the AFEM. The website discussion board posting regarding an ABCMR decision on award of the AFEM for Berlin shows an applicant who...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029963

    Original file (20100029963.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026328

    Original file (20100026328.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Members of the Armed Forces of the United States in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for this award. Based on a qualifying period of service and his assignment to a unit which provided direct support for the Vietnam War, he is entitled to award of the AFEM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the following awards...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027569

    Original file (20100027569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AFEM is authorized for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military operations within a specific geographic area during specified time periods. As such, there is insufficient evidence in which to award him the AFEM.