Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009722
Original file (20120009722.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 December 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120009722 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military pay records and payment of all back pay he is due.

2.  The applicant states he was on the advance party for his unit for Exercise REFORGER (Return of Forces to Germany).  After the main party of his unit arrived in Germany everyone was paid.  However, the amount of pay he and the others received was incorrect.  They were told their pay would be corrected when they returned to Fort Riley, Kansas; however, his pay was never corrected.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 April 1979 for a period of
4 years.

   a.  Upon completion of training he was awarded military occupational specialty 51B (Carpentry and Masonry Specialist).

   b.  He was assigned to Company B, 34th Engineer Battalion, Fort Riley, Kansas, on 27 July 1979.

   c.  He was promoted to specialist four/pay grade E-4 with a date of rank of
1 August 1980.

3.  A DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 2 April 1983 based on expiration term of service and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his Reserve obligation.

4.  U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, MO, Orders D-01-004776, dated 23 January 1985, honorably discharged the applicant from the USAR effective 22 January 1985.

5.  A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to show any evidence that he served overseas in Germany or that he initiated a pay inquiry.

6.  Title 31, U.S. Code, section 3702, also known as the barring statute, prohibits the payment of a claim against the Government unless the claim has been received by the Comptroller General within 6 years after the claim accrues.  Among the important public policy considerations behind statutes of limitations, including the 6-year limitation for filing claims contained in this section of Title 31, U.S. Code, is relieving the government of the need to retain, access, and review old records for the purpose of settling stale claims, which are often difficult to prove or disprove.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military pay records should be corrected and he should be paid all of the back pay he is due because he was not properly paid during Exercise REFORGER.

2.  The sincerity of the applicant's comments is not in question.  However, there is no evidence of record, and the applicant provides insufficient evidence, to show he initiated a pay inquiry because he was not properly paid during the period of military service under review.
3.  The barring statute prohibits the payment of a claim against the Government unless the claim has been received by the Comptroller General within 6 years after the claim accrues.

   a.  The applicant was REFRAD on 2 April 1983 and he was discharged from the USAR on 22 January 1985. 

   b.  The available evidence does not show the applicant took action to rectify any pay-related issues with the Army Finance and Accounting Center or, later, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service.

4.  Therefore, in view of all of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009722



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120009722



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003902

    Original file (20130003902.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect: * correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 18 March 1988 to show in item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) the date 30 July 1983 vice 7 May 1985 * retroactive payment of $39.00 per month for his military pay when he held the rank/grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3 * the issuance of the Physical Fitness Badge 2. The evidence of record confirms the applicant enlisted in the RA and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000377

    Original file (20120000377.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He goes on to state that in September 2011 he received notification from DFAS that his retirement account had been corrected and that he would receive back pay for only the last 6 years because they were prohibited from paying more than 6 years under the Barring Statute; however, they collected all back premiums for the Survivor Benefits Plan (SBP) all the way back to the date of his retirement. It is also reasonable to believe that had he known that he was not being credited with the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000530

    Original file (20090000530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show all awards and decorations to which he may be entitled, his Vietnam service, and that he be paid for his accrued leave. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was not paid for this accrued leave. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding to item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016262

    Original file (20110016262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 17 April 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110016262 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to show correction of his military records to show he had enrolled in the direct deposit program and to be paid any monies owed to him regardless of his missing payroll records and the 1940 Barring Act. Incorporated herein by reference are military records, which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003822

    Original file (20090003822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant was released from active duty on 15 September 1975 in pay grade E-3 and transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) on the following day. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005212

    Original file (20110005212.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was 12 years of age at the time of his step-grandfather’s death. The evidence of record shows the FSM enrolled in the RCSBP in 1997 for natural person with insurable interest coverage, with the applicant as the beneficiary, and the applicant was only 6 years of age. The FSM died on 19 November 2003 and the applicant was only about 12 years of age.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021780

    Original file (20120021780.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In 2008, she called the Army about his retirement and received some paperwork. The evidence of record shows the FSM completed 20 years of service in June 2006 and he was mailed a 20-Year Letter. The FSM did not submit an RCSBP election; however, he was automatically enrolled in Option C. The FSM died on 10 October 2006, after the 90-day election period closed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003815

    Original file (20120003815.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 32 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he held the permanent rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and he was entitled to pay at the E-5 rate upon separation. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The evidence of record shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003152

    Original file (20150003152.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the rank and grade on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show specialist four (SP4)/E-4 and that he be paid the monies he was due for his separation pay when he was released from active duty on 16 September 1966, plus the interest accrued. His record contains: a. Regardless, the statute of limitations for a claim against the Government expired in 1972, 6 years after the date of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001922

    Original file (20080001922.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant requested to be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 6, paragraph 6-3a for financial hardship. Orders were published assigning the applicant to Fort Jackson, South Carolina, for his final outprocessing, with a reporting date and discharge date to be announced. The evidence shows the orders were published by Fort Dix, New Jersey, discharging the applicant from the Regular Army effective 2 February 1979.