Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003815
Original file (20120003815.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120003815 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 32 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he held the permanent rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and he was entitled to pay at the E-5 rate upon separation.

2.  He states he should have been paid at the E-5 rate rather than the private first class (PFC)/E-3 rate when he was discharged.

3.  He provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 15 November 1963.

3.  Section 1 (Appointments, Promotions, or Reductions) of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows:

	a.  PFC/E-3 (permanent (P)) effective 18 July 1964 by authority of Unit Orders Number 40, Headquarters, 1st Battalion, 18th Infantry Regiment, Fort Riley, KS, dated 18 July 1964;

	b.  specialist four (SP4)/E-4 (temporary (T)) effective 12 December 1964 by authority of Unit Orders Number 68, Headquarters, 1st Battalion, 18th Infantry Regiment, Fort Riley, KS, dated 12 December 1964;

	c.  SP4/E-4 (P) effective 12 December 1964 by authority of Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), dated 13 August 1965; and

	d.  SGT/E-5 (T) effective 14 August 1965 by authority of Special Orders (SO) Number 23, Headquarters, 2nd Brigade, 1st Infantry Division, Vietnam, dated 14 August 1965.

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 3 November 1965 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (Annual Training).  His DD Form 214 shows he completed a total of 1 year, 11 months, and 19 days of creditable active service.  His DD Form 214 also shows the following entries:

* item 3a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) – "SGT/E-5 (T)"
* item 3b (Date of Rank) – "14 AUG 65"
* item 32 (Remarks) – "ITEM 3A – PFC E-3 (P) APTD 18 JUL 64"

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), then in effect, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  This regulation stated to enter the grade in which serving at the time of separation, indicating whether permanent or temporary.  Enter the date of rank shown and if the date of rank is different from the date of appointment, enter the date of appointment in item 32 of the DD Form 214.  If the grade as shown in item 3a is not permanent, enter the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank in item 32 if different from the date of appointment.

6.  Title 31 U.S. Code, section 3702, also known as the barring statute, prohibits the payment of a claim against the government unless the claim has been received by the Comptroller General within 6 years after the claim accrues.

7.  The equitable Doctrine of Laches permits dismissal of a claim when an applicant's unreasonable delay in asserting an error or injustice makes it impossible for the Army to retrieve information necessary to evaluate an applicant's asserted basis for relief.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant's DD Form 214 correctly shows he was promoted to the temporary rank/pay grade of SGT/E-5 effective 14 August 1965.

2.  However, section 1 of his DA Form 24 shows he was permanently appointed in rank/pay grade SP4/E-4 on 13 August 1965.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of item 32 of his DD Form 214 to show "ITEM 3A – SP4 E-4 (P) APTD 13 AUG 65."

3.  During the applicant's period of service Soldiers were paid based upon their temporary grade in cases where it was higher than their permanent grade.  Therefore, it is presumed he was paid as an E-5 at the time of his separation.

4.  With respect to his alleged entitlement to unpaid pay and allowances, irrespective of the Barring Act, a service member claiming additional pay and allowances previously accrued but not paid has the burden of proving that he/she was not paid the pay and allowances claimed.  There is no evidence in his record nor did he submit any evidence that shows he is entitled to any unpaid pay and allowances.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___x_____  __x___  ___x____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 as follows:

	a.  deleting the entry "ITEM 3A – PFC E-3 (P) APTD 18 JUL 64" from item 32 and

	b.  adding the entry "ITEM 3A – SP4 E-4 (P) APTD 13 AUG 65" to item 32.

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to showing his permanent rank as SGT/E-5 and entitlement pay at the SGT/E-5 rate at the time of his separation.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003815



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120003815



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002537C070205

    Original file (20060002537C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends, in effect, that his discharge documents should be corrected to show that he held that rank of sergeant/pay grade E-5 at the time of his separation from active duty and discharge from the Army Reserve because he was promoted shortly before he left Germany, but his promotion orders were not forwarded to him or the gaining command. In view of the foregoing and despite the absence of sergeant (E-5) promotion orders in the applicant's military personnel records,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018855

    Original file (20070018855.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 3a (Grade, Rate or Rank) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show sergeant (SGT)/E-5. The applicant states, in effect, he was a SGT/E-5 when he was discharged from military service. _ ___X____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006496

    Original file (20110006496.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 October 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110006496 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was separated in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 (P) permanent. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018301

    Original file (20090018301.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 April 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090018301 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his rank/grade as PFC/E-3 and that he should have been paid for his accrued leave based on this rank/grade. The evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed to the permanent rank/grade of PFC/E-3 on 17 February 1965.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004675

    Original file (20080004675.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 3a (Grade, Rate or Rank) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show specialist (SP4), E-4 instead of private first class permanent, PFC (P) (E-3). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. _ _______...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003152

    Original file (20150003152.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the rank and grade on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show specialist four (SP4)/E-4 and that he be paid the monies he was due for his separation pay when he was released from active duty on 16 September 1966, plus the interest accrued. His record contains: a. Regardless, the statute of limitations for a claim against the Government expired in 1972, 6 years after the date of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002553

    Original file (20150002553.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He states his rank was SP4/E-4 at the time of his release from active duty. The applicant’s records are not available for the Board to review; however, there is sufficient evidence provided by the applicant to address his request.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009976

    Original file (20120009976.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant did not provide any evidence. However, his records contain two DA Forms 24 (Service Record) and a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), as follows: a. DA Form 24 covering the period 10 September 1962 to 2 September 1965 shows in Section 1 - Appointments, Promotions or Reduction the following grades and effective dates: * private (PVT)/E-1, 10 September 1962 * private (PVT)/E-2,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023196

    Original file (20110023196.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 2962 (Security Termination Statement and Debriefing Certificate), dated 20 September 1967; DA Form 137 (Installation Clearance Record), dated September 1967; and U.S. Army Accessions Command Form 170 (Army Reserve Personnel Data Review), dated 26 March 1968; all show his grade of SP4/E-4 lined through and entered by hand as SGT/E-5. The applicant requests his rank be corrected to show SGT on his DD Form 214. Therefore, the DA Form 2496 which shows he was recommended for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013644

    Original file (20110013644.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 13 February 1967 to on or about 24 June 1967. With respect to his rank, the evidence of record shows the applicant was permanently appointed to the rank/grade of SP4/E-4 on 21 December 1966. With respect to the Purple Heart, the applicant was evacuated to military medical facilities as a patient during his service in the Republic of Vietnam; however,...