Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005212
Original file (20110005212.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 January 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110005212 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be paid the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity designated to be paid to him by his step- grandfather, a retired U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) master sergeant (MSG) who is now deceased. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his step-grandfather, a former service member (FSM), designated him to receive an RCSBP annuity immediately upon his death and he has been attempting since 2005 to receive this benefit and just kept getting the run-around.  He continues by stating that he is now being told he waited too late to apply for the benefit.

3.  The applicant provides:

* a copy of the FSM’s death certificate
* Copies of correspondence from the Human Resources Command (HRC)
* A copy of a letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) addressed to his father in 2005

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The FSM was born on 5 June 1944.  On 27 September 1997, while in the USAR, he completed a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) in which he made an election for full coverage, option C immediate coverage for a natural person with insurable interest.  The person designated for insurable interest coverage was the applicant, who was 6 years of age at the time (date of birth 14 August 1991). 

3.  On 1 May 1998, the FSM was transferred to the Retired Reserve.  On 19 November 2003, the FSM died at the age of 59 years and 5 months of age. The applicant was 12 years of age at the time of his step-grandfather’s death.

4.  A review of the FSM’s records shows that the FSM created a testamentary trust for the applicant in his last will and testament.  There is also evidence the applicant’s father contacted the Retired and Annuity Pay Section at DFAS in 2005 seeking payment on the applicant’s behalf.

5.  On 21 January 2010, officials at HRC mailed an SBP annuity packet to the applicant’s father and it was returned on 1 March 2010 and was processed by HRC and forwarded to officials at DFAS.

6.  On 13 January 2011, officials at DFAS informed officials at HRC that no valid annuity application was received within the 6-year statute of limitations and therefore could not be paid.

7.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; or (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.  Once a member elects either options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable.

8.  Title 31, U.S. Code, section 3702, also known as the barring statute, prohibits the payment of a claim against the government unless the claim has been received by the Comptroller General within 6 years after the claim accrues.  Among the important public policy considerations behind statutes of limitations, including the 6-year limitation for filing claims contained in this section of Title 31, U.S. Code, is relieving the government of the need to retain, access, and review old records for the purpose of settling stale claims, which are often difficult to prove or disprove.
  
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the FSM enrolled in the RCSBP in 1997 for natural person with insurable interest coverage, with the applicant as the beneficiary, and the applicant was only 6 years of age.  The FSM died on 19 November 2003 and the applicant was only about 12 years of age.  The applicant is not a military member and was not aware of the requirement to submit a claim within a specified period.  There is some evidence to indicate the applicant’s father contacted DFAS in 2005 seeking the annuity for the applicant.  It appears that had he received proper assistance from the Army or DFAS, he would have applied for the SBP in a timely manner.  As all relevant information is available, the purpose of the barring statue would not be served in this case.

2.  In view of the foregoing, the Army's records should be corrected to show the applicant applied for the RCSBP annuity on 1 December 2003 and returned the application to the appropriate office in a timely manner.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant applied for the SBP annuity on 1 December 2003 and returned the application to the appropriate office in a timely manner where it was processed in a timely manner.

2.  DFAS should pay the applicant the SBP annuity effective the day after the FSM's death.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005212



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110005212



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007559

    Original file (20120007559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 April 2011, by letter to DFAS, the applicant stated: * She had enclosed the necessary documentation DFAS requested regarding the FSM's death * She had been informed the last retirement payment would be made via direct deposit, and further payments would be terminated due to the FSM's death * She understood she was not entitled to compensation regarding his retirement pay because she was not his dependent * She was designated as his natural insurable interest SBP beneficiary on his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005953

    Original file (20130005953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests payment of the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity based on the FSM's death. This letter further informed him: By law, you have only 90 calendar days from the date you receive this letter to submit your SBP Election Certificate (DD Form 1883). The FSM's records do not indicate he elected to participate in the RCSBP within 90 days of receiving his 20-year letter.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005343

    Original file (20070005343.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a third affidavit submitted by the applicant, Mr. K****, a licensed attorney who has known the FSM from 1980 until his death in 2006 and who is also related to the FSM, states that he had numerous discussions with the FSM regarding the SBP, retirement benefits, and financial planning. Although the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri has informed the applicant that there is no DD Form 1883 on file showing that the FSM elected RCSBP coverage, this does not mean that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009162C070208

    Original file (20040009162C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records be corrected to show her mother applied for the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity on her behalf in a timely manner. The applicant also provides a 2 August 2004 letter from the Oklahoma National Guard, Joint Force Headquarters; a 2 August 2004 letter addressed to the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command; a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate); a DD Form 1884 (Application for Annuity under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008509

    Original file (20130008509.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Three options were available: * elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation * elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60, but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; or * elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60 Once a member elects either option B or C in any category of coverage, that election is irrevocable. The evidence of record shows the FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006415

    Original file (20080006415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 Memorandum, dated 17 November 1988. c. DD Form 1883, dated 7 January 1989. d. Certificate of Marriage, dated 2 August 2000. e. Miscellaneous letters and Designation of Beneficiary Forms from the New York State Police and Fire Retirement System. This letter notified the FSM that he had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. Even if the FSM had been able to enroll the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019212

    Original file (20140019212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * Army regulations in effect at the time the FSM submitted his retired pay application required the submission of a DD Form 2656 (Data For Payment of Retired Personnel) * After an exhaustive search with the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) advised her that they could not find this document * She was never counseled or provided any documentation to sign for or notarize to relinquish of the SBP * She was married to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003015

    Original file (20120003015.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a 15 July 2002 letter, the applicant's attorney indicated she mailed documents (e.g., certified copy of the final decree of divorce, letter from the applicant, and agreement to name the applicant former spouse beneficiary under the SBP) to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in Denver, CO, with a return receipt request (7109 2817 3080 0000 0491). f. the necessary documentation was sent to DFAS in a timely manner along with the agreement between the spouses and a certified...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005632C070206

    Original file (20050005632C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 22 October 1999, the FSM elected to terminate his participation in the SBP. The applicant's daughter is listed as the annuitant on DFAS's 17 February 2005 letter to the applicant. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM did not request termination of his SBP in October 1999 but continued to remain enrolled in the SBP for child-only coverage; b. collecting any SBP costs due; and c. paying to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062788C070421

    Original file (2001062788C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 March 1987, the FSM was counseled concerning the RCSBP and on that date completed a Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, DD Form 1883. Records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service – Cleveland Center (DFAS-CL) indicate that the DD Form 1883 was not on file and presumably was not forwarded to DFAS by the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command when the FSM applied for retired pay. The DD Form 2656 provides an option not to participate; it does not provide an option to...