Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003822
Original file (20090003822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		BOARD DATE:	  22 December 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003822 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests travel pay and leave pay for his last 15 days in the service from 1 September 1975 to 15 September 1975.  

2.  The applicant states that he filed a claim for $1,897.00 when he separated on 15 September 1975.  When he checked on his claim again, he was told that his records were burned.  He contends that he never received travel/vacation pay for 15 days.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 August 1972.  He completed the required training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (light weapons infantryman).  His highest grade held was private first class, E-3.

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was absent without leave (AWOL) from 11 September 1973 to 26 September 1973 (16 days).

4.  The applicant was released from active duty on 15 September 1975 in pay grade E-3 and transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) on the following day.  

5.  Items 18(a) (Net Active Service This Period) and 18(c) (Record of Service) (Total Active Service) of his DD Form 214 shows he was credited with 3 years total active service.  Item 18(e) (Total Service for Pay) shows he was credited with 3 years of total service for pay.  

6.  Item 27 (Remarks) shows he had 16 days of lost time from 
11 to 26 September 1973.

7.  The applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR on 30 August 1978.

8.  As a matter of information, Title 31, U.S. Code, section 3702, also known as the Barring Statute, prohibits the payment of a claim against the Government unless the claim has been received by the Comptroller General within 6 years after the claim accrues.  Among the important public policy considerations behind statutes of limitations, including the 6-year limitation for filing claims contained in this section of Title 31, U.S. Code, is relieving the Government of the need to retain, access, and review old records for the purpose of settling stale claims, which are often difficult to prove or disprove.

9.  The doctrine of laches is defined by Black’s Law Dictionary, sixth edition, as the neglect to assert a right or claim which, taken together with lapse of time and other circumstances causing prejudice to the adverse party, operates as a bar in a court of equity.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states he filed a claim for $1,897.00 when he was separated on 15 September 1975.  However, there is no evidence of record to substantiate his claim.  

2.  An arbitrary ruling in the applicant's favor, without knowing what his personnel and/or finance records would have shown, would cause prejudice to the Government.  Had he applied to the ABCMR earlier an equitable decision could possibly have been made in his case.  However, at this time, the doctrine of laches is invoked in his case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  ____x____  ____x__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003822





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003822



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002802

    Original file (20150002802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Officers who were qualified for retirement could apply for voluntary retirement to be effective not later than the first day of the month following their scheduled release date. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected by showing he was promoted to lieutenant colonel, pay grade O-5 because he was forced to retire in spite of his outstanding military service as a major, pay grade O-4, for his last 8 years of active duty service. The available evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005197

    Original file (20130005197.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) to show she retired as a sergeant major (SGM), pay grade E-9. Although she retired on 26 May 1976 in the rank of master sergeant, pay grade E-8, she previously held the grade of E-9 in the USAR from 24 October 1965 to 1 October 1970. This form also shows her last promotion was to master sergeant, pay grade E-8 with a date of rank of 1 May 1963.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002560

    Original file (20120002560.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests combat pay for his service in Korea. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. However, without evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed he received combat pay during the period he was in Korea.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003367

    Original file (20120003367.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. His military pay record is not available for review and there is no indication on his DD Form 214 that his final pay was less than the grade shown on this form. There is no evidence and he has not provided any evidence to show he was not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014754

    Original file (20130014754.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Only Soldiers assigned to an active status in a Reserve Component or individuals in active Federal service are authorized to earn retirement point credit. However, the letters from the DAIG and 1st U.S. Army DCSPER provided by the applicant show that corrective action was taken with respect to the adverse actions taken against him by his battalion commander. The available evidence also shows his transfer to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) in 1987 was not punitive or an adverse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014371

    Original file (20110014371.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. His military records are not available to the Board for review. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001489

    Original file (20140001489.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not provided any evidence showing that he did not received all the pay to which he was entitled while he was in the Army. _______ _ X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008427

    Original file (20120008427.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant recently learned that the 3163rd Signal Service Company returned to the United States on 10 June 1945; however, the advanced echelon group was not permitted to return until January 1946. The applicant's pay records are not available for the Board's review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019845

    Original file (20140019845.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his military records by showing he was not absent without leave (AWOL) from 25 February through 8 March 1971. On 22 March 1971, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for being AWOL from 25 February through 8 March 1971 (12 days).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016339

    Original file (20140016339.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He argues that he did not discover the error until 1987 when he discussed the allotments with his father and was told that none of them had ever been received. He acknowledges that his father received a letter, dated 21 October 1988, from the U.S. Army Finance and Accounting Center (USAFAC) stating it had been determined that none of the checks had been cashed and had been replaced. The applicant contends, in effect, that his military records should be corrected to show entitlement to...