Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016262
Original file (20110016262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  17 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110016262 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to show correction of his military records to show he had enrolled in the direct deposit program and to be paid any monies owed to him regardless of his missing payroll records and the 1940 Barring Act.

2.  He states:

   a.  on several occasions, he filed for direct deposit after returning to the U.S. from Vietnam, both while on active duty and as a civilian well within the 
6 year time line established by the Barring Act.

   b.  on different occasions, at different installations, he was told his records were lost in transit, burned up in a fire in 1973, and destroyed by the North Vietnamese;  

	c.  he enclosed all the DD Forms 2139 and 2139-1 (Military Pay Voucher) and DA Forms 2349 (Military Pay Voucher (Mechanized)) he received which: 

   (1)  clearly show his direct deposit was being withheld;
   
   (2)  show more than one signature, in addition to his;
   
   (3)  clearly show a different bank than the one he signed up for;
   
   (4)  money was withheld while he was in Vietnam, in the hospital in Japan, and until he was promoted to specialist four (SP4)/E-4 upon his return to the U.S.; and 

   (5)  do not show any payment of the deducted direct deposits.  

3.  He submitted copies of his DD Forms 2139 and 2139-1 (Military Pay Vouchers) and DA Forms 2349 (Military Pay Voucher (Mechanized)).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records, which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100030195, dated 19 July 2011.

2.  The applicant provides new evidence in the form of military pay vouchers which were not previously reviewed by the ABCMR.  Therefore, they are considered new evidence and as such warrant consideration by the Board.  

3.  The available military personnel records show he enlisted in the Regular Army 
9 August 1967:

4.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

   a.  item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Vietnam from 7 February 1968 to 
4 January 1969 and in Germany from 3 October 1969 to 30 July 1970;
      
   b.  item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) he was advanced to SP4 on 
15 April 1969; while assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment 30th Engineer Battalion, Fort Belvoir, VA; 
   
   c.  item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to:
   
(1)  Company A, 4th Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment, 199th Infantry
Brigade from 19 February to 21 May 1968; 

		(2)  Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 4th Battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment, 199th Infantry Brigade from 22 May to 22 August 1968;

   (3)  Headquarters and Service Battery, 2d Battalion, 40th Artillery
Regiment, 199th Infantry Brigade from 23 August to12 November 1968; 

   (4)  Military Hospital Detachment, 106th General Hospital, Japan from 
13 November 1968 to 4 February 1969;

		(5)  Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment, 30th Engineer Battalion, Fort Belvoir, VA from 4 February to 19 October 1969; and

   (6)  Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 5th Battalion, 83rd Field Artillery Regiment, Europe from 16 October 1969 to 20 July 1970.

5.  On 30 July 1970, he was released from active duty and transferred to the 
U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) after serving honorably for 
2 years, 11 months, and 22 days.

6.  He submitted:

   a.  17 DA Forms 2139, rendered for pay period 1 January through 31 March 1968 and 14 November 1968 through 30 July 1970, which show in item 51 (Signature of Payee) that with his signature he acknowledged receipt of the dollar amounts shown as paid in item 44 (Amount Paid);

	b.  12 DA Forms 2139-1, which show in item 11 (Remarks) from:

(1)  1 April through 30 June 1968, a portion of his pay in the form of a 
check was mailed to Chase Manhattan Bank, National Assistance Saigon, Viet Nam, Box 20, APO SF 96243, account number 950-1-348891, and the remainder was disbursed in cash; 

		(2)  1 July through 30 November 1968, a portion of his pay in the form of a check was mailed to Chase Manhattan Bank, 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza, New York, NY, account number 950-1-348891, and the remainder was disbursed in cash; and 

		(3)  7 April through 9 August 1968, that with his signature he acknowledged receipt of the cash amounts shown as paid in item 44. 

	c.  15 DA Forms 2349, from the period 1 March 1969 through 30 June 1970, which show in item 68 (Signature of Payee (or check number) with his signature he acknowledged receipt of the amounts shown as paid in cash.

7.  Title 31 U. S. Code, section 3702, also known as the barring statute, prohibits the payment of a claim against the Government unless the claim has been received by the Comptroller General within 6 years after the claim accrues. 
8.  The equitable Doctrine of Laches permits dismissal of a claim when an applicant’s unreasonable delay in asserting an error or injustice makes it impossible for the Army to retrieve information necessary to evaluate an applicant’s asserted basis for relief.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions that his military records should be corrected to show he had enrolled in the DDP and he should be paid any monies owed to him regardless of his missing payroll records and the 1940 Barring Act were carefully considered and found to be without merit.

2.  There is no evidence nor did he submit any evidence showing:

* he initiated any inquiries into the status of his direct deposit requests while still on active duty or after his release from active duty  
* his monies were not directly deposited into the Chase Manhattan Bank
* he applied for direct deposit after his return from Vietnam  

3.  He submitted evidence that clearly shows, while stationed in Vietnam, as acknowledged by his signature, and witnessed by the paymaster, from 1 April through 30 November 1968, that a portion of his pay was to be deposited by check in an account with Chase Manhattan Bank and he received the remainder in cash.

4.  With respect to his alleged entitlement to unpaid pay and allowances, irrespective of the Barring Act, a service member claiming additional pay and allowances previously accrued but not paid, has the burden of proving that he/she was not paid the pay and allowances claimed.  There is no evidence in his record nor did he submit any evidence that shows he is entitled to any unpaid pay and allowances.  

5.  This Board operates under the standard of presumption of regularity in governmental affairs.  This standard states, in effect, that in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the Board must presume that all actions taken by the military were proper.  There is nothing in the records or in the evidence submitted by the applicant that overcomes this presumption.

6.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20100030195 dated 19 July 2011.



   ________x____________
 														   CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016262





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110016262



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007376

    Original file (20080007376.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that he served in Vietnam between 1969 and 1970. The applicant's military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 15 May 1968. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was paid hostile fire pay for performing TDY in Vietnam between September 1969 and March 1970.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084239C070212

    Original file (2003084239C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214, 7 Military Pay Vouchers (DA Forms 2349), and an Allotment Authorization Form (DA Form 1341). EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The Board notes the applicant’s request that his military records be corrected to show he was promoted to the rank of SGT/E-5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140010296

    Original file (AR20140010296.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    * he highlights item 6, titled "Service for Pay" which shows a "1" under YRS and a date of 29 October 1970 under "DATE COMP" * Army Regulation 37-104-2 identifies item 6 as designed to show years of service as well as the date of the last full year of service completed * the applicant was inducted on 29 October 1969 and had exactly one year of service for pay purposes on 29 October 1970 * item 8 is identified in Army Regulation 37-104-2 as showing the pay period for that pay voucher; this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023931

    Original file (20110023931.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his records to show he completed 2 months and 29 days of foreign service in Vietnam vice 1 month and 27 days. The applicant provides: * letter from the U.S. Army Administration Center, St. Louis, MO (previously submitted) * DD Form 1108 (Application for Replacement of Separation Document) (previously submitted) * mailing envelope (previously submitted) * DD Forms 2349 (Military Pay Voucher) for 1-30 June 1965...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003155

    Original file (20140003155.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, the following: * issuance of a DD Form 256 (Honorable Discharge Certificate) for his period of service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) showing his pay grade of E-5 * issuance of a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Transfer from Active Duty) for his period of service in the USAR 2. The only document he has left to claim is a DD Form 256 for his honorable discharge from his USAR, his pay grade of E-5, and a DD Form 214 for this time, if applicable. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075074C070403

    Original file (2002075074C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows that Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 196th Infantry Brigade was awarded the Valorous Unit Award for the period 11 - 31 August 1969 and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 24 August - 31 December 1969. The evidence of record shows the applicant was a temporary SP5 at the time he separated and that his DD Form 214 fails to show his correct rank, grade, and date of rank. The applicant met the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009001

    Original file (20120009001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    From the pay inquiry, finance began recouping the debt despite the fact that she paid the funds directly to the finance cash cage and cleared Wiesbaden in July 2008. The official stated a review of the applicant's request determined no grounds existed to remit or cancel the debt based on hardship or injustice in accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 600-4 (Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness). She does not have a receipt for the payment and the DA Form 137-E she provided...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001209

    Original file (20120001209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001790

    Original file (20150001790.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides: a. The applicant requests his service on the DMZ in Korea be reflected on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002768

    Original file (20070002768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), with an effective date of 12 April 1970; Baltimore City Health Department, Bureau of Vital Records, Certification of Birth - Short Form, Number 83###, dated 14 October 1964; National Personnel Records Center, Military Personnel Records, St. Louis, Missouri, letter, dated 23 May 2005; 2 Standard Forms (SF) 89 (Report of Medical History), dated 12 April 1970 and 15 August 1967;...