IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 26 October 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100013659
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests removal of a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), signed on 19 October 2006, from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).
2. The applicant states he should not have been issued a DA Form 1059 because he was unqualified upon arrival at Drill Sergeant School.
3. The applicant provides:
* his DA Form 1059, signed on 19 October 2006
* excerpts from Army Regulation 614-200 (Enlisted Assignments and Utilization Management)
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is a staff sergeant currently serving on active duty.
2. A DA Form 1059, signed on 19 October 2006, from the Drill Sergeant School indicates the applicant was not evaluated on any demonstrated abilities. The period of report was from 18 - 19 October 2006. A note in item 14 (Comments) stated the applicant was released in accordance with Army Regulation 614-200, paragraph 8-17a(1), for exceeding body fat standards.
3. Paragraph 8-17a(1) of Army Regulation 614-200 states that a Soldier may be removed from the Drill Sergeant Program if they arrive unqualified at the Drill Sergeant School.
4. Paragraph 8-17a(1) of Army Regulation 614-200 states a DA Form 1059 will be completed for Soldiers (excluding those who were unqualified upon arrival) removed from the Drill Sergeant School. Names of Soldiers who were unqualified upon arrival at Drill Sergeant School will be reported, in writing, to Human Resources Command (HRC).
5. Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) provides in Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) that DA Forms 1059 are filed in the Performance Section of the OMPF. This regulation also provides that once filed, such documents become a permanent part of the OMPF and may only be removed by one of several agencies, one of which is the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR).
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends the DA Form 1059, signed on 19 October 2006, should be removed from his OMPF.
2. Based on the period covered by the DA Form 1059, it is clear the applicant was unqualified upon arrival at the Drill Sergeant School due to his exceeding body fat standards. According to the regulation, the applicant's name would be reported to HRC; however, he was excluded from receiving a DA Form 1059.
3. In view of the above, it is appropriate to remove the DA Form 1059 signed on 19 October 2006 from the applicant's OMPF.
BOARD VOTE:
____X____ ____X____ ____X____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing the DA Form 1059, signed on 19 October 2006, from the applicant's OMPF.
_______ _ X_______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100013659
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100013659
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007483
The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 19 January 2007, from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Accordingly, as required by the applicable regulation at the time, she was issued a DA Form 1059 that shows she marginally achieved course standards in that she met the academic requirements but failed to meet body fat standards IAW AR 600-9 during this course. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007366
Counsel requests the applicant be reinstated in the Drill Sergeant (DS) Program and all related documents, including her letter of reprimand (LOR), letter of removal from the DS Program, and relief-for-cause noncommissioned officer evaluation report (NCOER), be removed from her official military personnel file (OMPF) or moved to the restricted fiche. c. The applicant's LOR and removal from the DS Program were false and unjust. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was involved in a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010969
The applicant requests; * dismissal of the action that removed him from the drill sergeant program * retention of his Drill Sergeant Identification Badge * retention of his "X" special qualification identifier (SQI) * removal of the change of rater DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER)), covering the rating period 1 November 2010 through 1 June 2011 (hereafter referred to as the contested NCOER) from his records 2. The applicant provides: * Letter, dated 10 April...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073081C070403
The applicant requests that his DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 27 June 1997, for the period 1 to 27 June 1997, be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), or be transferred to his Restricted (R) fiche, of his OMPF. The applicant's DA Form 1059, dated 27 June 1997, for the period 1 to 27 June 1997, was properly filed on the Performance (P) fiche of his OMPF in accordance with applicable regulations. __mp___ ___ho__ __cp___ GRANT AS STATED IN...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002368
He provides: * his Enlisted Record Brief * a DA Form 1059 showing he "achieved course standards" * a DA Form 1059 showing he "exceeded course standards" * a self-authored memorandum to the Board * an Army Medical Department (AMEDD) NCO Academy memorandum, subject: Commandant's List * a recognition ceremony announcement containing a Commandant's List for BNCOC Class 001-06 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. In connection with the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017183
The applicant requests his DA Form 1059 (Academic Evaluation Report) for the Drill Sergeant Course be moved to the restricted portion of his official military personnel file (OMPF). In this regard, the OMPF serves to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, and evaluation periods and any corrections to other parts of the OMPF. The applicant requests his DA Form 1059 for the Drill Sergeant Course be transferred to the restricted portion of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004894
The applicant requests, in effect, the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) currently filed in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), be replaced with one that shows he "Exceeded Course Standards." He contends that the DA Form 1059 he was given should show he "Exceeded Course Standards." The applicant provided a memorandum from the commandant congratulating him for achieving "academic excellence" by being placed on the Commandant's List; however, this does not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011228
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 August 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090011228 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 24 July 2008, that shows he achieved course standards be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). He states that the DA Form 1059 that shows he did not complete DSS is correct and the DA Form 1059 that shows he completed the course needs to be removed from his OMPF.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001285
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 August 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120001285 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests the 17 March 2007 academic evaluation report (AER) for the drill sergeant school be removed from his record. The applicant provides, in support of his appeal, copies of both the 17 March 2007 "Failed" AER and the 28 July 2007 "Achieved Course Standards" AER.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008701
The applicant states that her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) was not correctly presented to the FY07 and FY08 MSG selection boards because the documentation removing her from the Drill Sergeant Program was improperly posted in the disciplinary portion of the file. The applicant contends that this administrative error made it appear that she had been removed from the Drill Sergeant Program for disciplinary reasons, when, in fact, she was administratively removed from the program for...