| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Joyce A. Wright | Analyst |
| Ms. Margaret K. Patterson | Chairperson | |
| Mr. Harry B. Oberg | Member | |
| Mr. Christopher J. Prosser | Member |
2. The applicant requests that his DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 27 June 1997, for the period 1 to 27 June 1997, be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), or be transferred to his Restricted (R) fiche, of his OMPF.
3. The applicant states he is currently a staff sergeant (SSG) stationed in Germany. He attended the Primary Leadership Development Course (PLDC) and received a "no-go" in the land navigation portion of the course. He arrived unprepared and untrained for the course and regrets that his leadership did not stress the importance of the training required prior to attending the course.
He attended PLDC from 6 October to 6 November 1997 and graduated as a member of the Commandant’s List. He also was a member of the Commandant's List while attending the Basic Noncommissioned Officers Course (BNCOC). In support of his application, he submits three DA Forms 1059 and four copies of his Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Reports (NCOERs).
4. The applicant's military records show he enlisted on 17 November 1993, as a supply specialist. He continues to serve on active duty in the rank of SSG.
5. The applicant's DA Form 1059, dated 27 June 1997, for the period 1 to
27 June 1997, shows in item 16 (Comments) that the applicant was released from the course due to failing to achieve a passing score on the "Land Navigation Exam," after being tested three times.
6. The applicant also provided two additional DA Form 1059s, dated 6 November 1997 and 17 May 2002, which show that he completed PLDC and BNCOC. While attending both courses the applicant exceeded course standards and was twice a member of the Commandant's List.
7. The applicant provided four copies of his NCOERs, which show that he has received successful ratings, recommendations for Drill Sergeant, and promotion to the next higher grade.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/
Records) prescribes the policies governing the Official Military Personnel File, the Military Personnel Records Jacket, the Career Management Individual File, and Army Personnel Qualification Records. Paragraph 2-4 of this regulation states that once a document is placed in the OMPF it becomes a permanent part of that file and will not be removed from that file or moved to another part of the file unless directed by the proper authorities listed in the regulation.
9. Table 2 of the regulation pertains to the composition of the OMPF. It states, in pertinent part, that the DA Form 1059 will be filed on the OMPF, Performance Data Section.
CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's DA Form 1059, dated 27 June 1997, for the period 1 to 27 June 1997, was properly filed on the Performance (P) fiche of his OMPF in accordance with applicable regulations.
2. Considering the fact that the applicant is now two grades higher, exceeded course standards at his last two NCO schools, the DA Form 1059, dated 27 June 1997, no longer serves a useful purpose for personnel management officials. Therefore, in the interest of justice, it would be appropriate to move the DA Form 1059, dated 27 June 1997, from the P fiche to the R fiche of his OMPF.
3. In view of the foregoing, the applicant's records should be corrected as recommended below.
RECOMMENDATION:
That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by moving his DA Form 1059, dated 27 June 1997, for the period 1 to 27 June 1997, from his P fiche to his R fiche of his OMPF.
BOARD VOTE:
__mp___ ___ho__ __cp___ GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
___Margaret K. Patterson__
CHAIRPERSON
| CASE ID | AR2002073081 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20020829 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . ACTIVE DUTY |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 267 | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070881C070402
The applicant requests that the Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER) (DA Form 1059) covering the period 20 April 1994 through 11 May 1994 [herein identified as the "contested AER"] be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) or transferred to the restricted fiche of his OMPF. On 11 May 1994, the applicant was notified by the Commandant of the NCO Academy that he had been released from the BNCOC Class Number 2-94 for academic reasons. Records show the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018297
The applicant requests removal of two DA Forms 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) dated 19 July 1999 and 26 February 2001 from her official military personnel file (OMPF). The document will not be removed from a fiche or moved to another part of the fiche unless directed by, among other agencies, the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) or the OMPF custodian when documents have been improperly filed. The applicable regulation states that once a document...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016258
The applicant requests removal of a negative DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Table 2-1 of AR 600-8-104 states that the DA Form 1059 will be filed in the performance section of the OMPF. This DA Form 1059, dated 1 August 2001, is also filed in her P fiche.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009267
The applicant states that: a. she has two DA forms 1059 showing she completed Phase I of BNCOC; b. she has completed the Warrior Leadership Course in 2006 and would like to have the DA Form 1059 for PLDC removed; c. she was awarded a certificate of achievement that is showing the wrong year; and d. she only needs one DD Form 214 in her OMPF. The applicant's records also show that she was released from active duty on 23 October 1999 in accordance with chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-200...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087464C070212
The applicant requests that the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER)), dated 19 October 2000, [herein identified as the "contested AER"] be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to the rank of staff sergeant effective 19 December 2001. That so much of the application as it relates to complete removal of the contested AER be denied.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008931
The applicant requests that a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) for the period 19 April 2001 through 10 May 2001 be removed from his official military personnel file (OMPF). There is no evidence that the DA Form 1059 for the period 19 April 2001 through 10 May 2001 was improperly issued or that it was improperly filed in the applicant's OMPF. ____________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015568
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 December 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140015568 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant was disenrolled from the Cargo Specialist BNCOC for driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol on 28 July 1997.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091588C070212
The applicant requests, in effect, that the DA Form 1059, Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER), dated 9 August 1996, be expunged from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant's AER, for the period 15 July 1996 through 9 August 1996, shows a forwarding address for a unit in Korea. The applicant in her response and acknowledgement to the notification under the provisions of Title 10, US Code 1556 stated that she had tried for 6 years to get the erroneous DA Form...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605941C070209
A 20 November 1990 AER from the software analyst, MOS 74F, BNCOC at Fort Gordon, Georgia, shows that she was administratively released from the course because she failed written and hands-on portion [of the course], with a recommendation that she be allowed to work in her MOS before attending the course again. She stated, in effect, that because of overstrength in MOS 74F at Fort Gordon, she did not have the opportunity to work in that MOS, and coupled with the fact that she was recently...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013770C070205
John Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, the removal of an Academic Evaluation Report (AER) (DA Form 1059) dated 11 March 1997 from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Therefore, absent evidence to show that the contested AER is improperly filed in her OMPF, there appears to be no basis to grant her request.