Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017183
Original file (20110017183.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 November 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110017183 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his DA Form 1059 (Academic Evaluation Report) for the Drill Sergeant Course be moved to the restricted portion of his official military personnel file (OMPF).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he has served honorably the past 10 years.  On 10 December 2010 he arrived back from his third deployment in Iraq.  He had not adjusted to his wife and two kids before he was told to report to Fort Jackson, SC for Drill Sergeant School in March 2011.  He was on the verge of a divorce and losing his kids so he drank to hide the pain.  He reported to physical training formation late and he was taken to the military police and administered an alcohol test which determined he had a .03 blood alcohol level.

3.  He contends he made a mistake and he has learned a great lesson from his mistake; however, he does not believe his mistake warrants a failure to achieve course standards on his DA Form 1059 and to be carried on his military record for the next ten years.  He has since saved his marriage, self enrolled in the Alcohol Substance Abuse Program (ASAP), and attends three Alcoholics Anonymous meetings a week.  

4.  The applicant provides his DA Form 1059 from Drill Sergeant Course
05-11 for the period 23 March to 8 April 2011.


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is a Regular Army staff sergeant assigned to Fort Stewart, GA.  

2.  On 23 March 2011, he attended the Drill Sergeant Course, at Fort Jackson, SC.  He was released from the course on 8 April 2011 for failing to achieve course standards.  

3.  The remarks section of his DA Form 1059 states he was released from the Drill Sergeant Program in accordance with Training and Doctrine Command Regulation 350-16 (Drill Sergeant Program), paragraph 2-5c(6), for failure to maintain high standards of military appearance, courtesy, bearing, conduct, and professionalism, including noncompliance with body composition requirements in Army Regulation 600-9 (The Army Weight Control Program), table 3-1 and testing positive for drugs.  Further, his chief instructor cites the additional following infractions:

* Lack of self-discipline, maturity and professional competence
* Failure to report to his appointed place of duty
* Failure to maintain the proper wear and fit of the Class A Uniform
* Lack of motivation "by not showing up for duty again with the odor of alcohol on his breath"
* A blood alcohol level of .03

4.  This form is filed in the performance section of his OMPF.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/
Records) provides the principles of support, standards of service, policies, tasks, rules, and steps governing all work required to support maintaining the OMPF.  Chapter 2 provides detailed guidance and instructions with regard to the initiation, composition, maintenance, changing, access to, and transfer of the OMPF.  Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) shows that the DA Form 
1059 and award orders are filed in the performance section of the OMPF.

6.  The purpose of maintaining the OMPF is to protect the interests of both the U.S. Army and the Soldier.  In this regard, the OMPF serves to maintain an unbroken, historical record of a Soldier's service, conduct, duty performance, and evaluation periods and any corrections to other parts of the OMPF.  Once placed in the OMPF, the document becomes a permanent part of that file and will not be removed from or moved to another part of the OMPF unless directed by an appropriate authority.

7.  Army Regulation 600-37 (Unfavorable Information) sets forth policies and procedures to authorize placement of unfavorable information about Army members in individual official personnel files.  Chapter 7 contains the policy for appeals and petitions for removal of unfavorable information from official personnel files.  It states once an official document has been properly filed in the OMPF, it is presumed to be administratively correct and to have been filed pursuant to an objective decision by competent authority.  Thereafter, the burden of proof rests with the individual concerned to provide evidence of a clear and convincing nature that the document is untrue or unjust, in whole or in part, thereby warranting its alteration or removal from the OMPF.  It further stipulates only letters of reprimand, admonition or censure may be the subject of an appeal for transfer to the Restricted portion of the OMPF.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1.  The applicant requests his DA Form 1059 for the Drill Sergeant Course be transferred to the restricted portion of his OMPF.

2.  The applicant's contention that he has made steps to control his substance abuse is noted but it is also noted that it has been less than 1 year since this serious infraction occurred.  The evidence of record shows he failed to achieve course standards for the Drill Sergeant Course for the period 23 March to 8 April 2011.  His DA Form 1059 shows he committed several acts of misconduct which included failure to report to his place of duty, noncompliance with body composition requirements, and abuse of alcohol.  

3.  Regulatory guidance states only letters of reprimand, admonition, or censure may be the subject of an appeal for transfer to the restricted portion of the OMPF.  Therefore, his DA Form 1059 is correctly filed and should not be transferred to the restricted section of his OMPF.  

4.  In view of the above, his request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017183



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110017183



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012820

    Original file (20100012820.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he provided the following documents in support of his application: * DA Form 4187 dated 4 March 2002 (not provided) * DA Form 4187 dated 28 March 2002 (not provided) * DD Form 553 dated 30 April 2002 * DD Form 616 dated 17 March 2003 * DA Form 4187 dated 18 March 2003 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. In this case, the documents in question documenting time lost on the part of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013512

    Original file (20120013512.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DASEB Record of Proceedings, dated 18 August 2011, shows (in part): a. the NCOER covering the period the applicant was reprimanded does not make any reference to his misconduct; b. twenty-nine months had elapsed since the applicant received the GOMOR and: * there was no other derogatory information in his records * he had received three NCOERs with superior ratings and potential for promotion since the incident * he was selected as a Commandant's list graduate of Phase 2 of the Advanced...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004398

    Original file (20150004398.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) for the period ending 31 May 2012, currently filed in her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) be removed. In accordance with the applicable regulation, the performance folder should show a continuous record of a Soldier's performance throughout his/her Army service. Therefore, her DA Form 1059 is correctly filed and should not be removed or transferred to the restricted folder of her OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004214

    Original file (20120004214.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests transfer of the letter removing him from the Drill Sergeant program from the performance portion to the restricted portion of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). He petitioned the DASEB in March 2007 for transfer of the following documents to the restricted section of his OMPF: * A General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR), dated 4 April 1994 * A Record of Proceedings under Article 15, UCMJ, dated 27 April 2004 * Letter removing him from the Drill...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000835

    Original file (20140000835.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) for the period ending 11 March 2013 currently filed in his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File) or transfer to the restricted folder. Appendix B (Documents Authorized for Filing in the AMHRR and/or Interactive Personnel Electronics Records Management System), Table B-1 (Authorized Documents), shows the DA Form 1059 is filed in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006075

    Original file (20090006075.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, removal of a memorandum, subject: Promotion to SFC [sergeant first class] as an Exception to Policy, dated 16 January 2007, from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The evidence of record shows that the applicant completed the required military education course (BNCOC) prior to being promoted to SFC/E-7. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008290

    Original file (20120008290.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He received a hardship discharge on 17 December 2004 and he was allowed to reenter the military 18 months later without any issues. His record shows that since his reenlistment, he: a. has been awarded: * two Army Good Conduct Medals * two Army Achievement Medals * four Army Commendation Medals b. has completed the following courses: * Medical Logistics Specialist Course * Warrior Leader Course * Basic Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Course * Tactical Battle Command Battle Staff Operations...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009267C070206

    Original file (20050009267C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that a memorandum of reprimand imposed by a general officer (GOMOR) and associated documents be expunged from the restricted portion of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant acknowledged the GOMOR and provided a rebuttal in which he maintained that he was not intoxicated under German law because his blood alcohol content (BAC) was only .054 at 0036 hours and .060 at 0038 hours and that German law provided that a BAC of .080 was considered evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011228

    Original file (20090011228.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 August 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090011228 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 24 July 2008, that shows he achieved course standards be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). He states that the DA Form 1059 that shows he did not complete DSS is correct and the DA Form 1059 that shows he completed the course needs to be removed from his OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008701

    Original file (20080008701.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) was not correctly presented to the FY07 and FY08 MSG selection boards because the documentation removing her from the Drill Sergeant Program was improperly posted in the disciplinary portion of the file. The applicant contends that this administrative error made it appear that she had been removed from the Drill Sergeant Program for disciplinary reasons, when, in fact, she was administratively removed from the program for...